GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Agriculture FarmingTop 10 Best Ag Dealer Management Software of 2026
Top 10 roundup ranks ag dealer management software, comparing features and workflows for Equip by NetSol, Nexpart, and DealerCenter.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Equip by NetSol
Configurable deal workflow orchestration that carries orders through fulfillment and service stages with controlled access and audit history.
Built for fits when multi-team dealerships need standardized deal workflows with RBAC and audit trails..
Nexpart
Editor pickWorkflow configuration for service and parts execution with automated handoffs via integration and API.
Built for fits when dealers need configurable workflow control plus API-driven system synchronization across sales, service, and parts..
DealerCenter
Editor pickDeal workflow status management tied to lead records for structured follow-up.
Built for fits when ag dealers need consistent lead-to-deal workflows across staff and locations..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Equip by NetSol
enterpriseEquipment dealer management and finance platform.
Configurable deal workflow orchestration that carries orders through fulfillment and service stages with controlled access and audit history.
Equip by NetSol is built around dealer workflow execution, with configuration that aligns stages from lead capture through quoting, ordering, and post-sale processes. The application is positioned for operations that require consistent data handling across sales, service, and finance teams rather than isolated work tracking. Role-based access and audit trails support admin control over who can configure workflows and who can execute deals.
A tradeoff appears in implementation effort because workflow configuration and role governance usually require structured onboarding and data readiness. Equip fits best when a dealership group needs standardized deal throughput across multiple teams and wants automation that reduces manual handoffs between sales and service.
- +Deal workflow coverage from quote to post-sale tracking
- +Role-based access for controlled configuration and execution
- +Auditability for transaction and administrative actions
- +Integration and automation hooks for connecting dealer systems
- –Workflow configuration requires structured onboarding
- –UI navigation can feel workflow-heavy for small teams
- –Admin governance setup adds initial operational overhead
- –Ag-specific process alignment may need careful mapping
Dealer operations managers
Standardize quote-to-order workflow
Fewer stalled deals
Service and parts coordinators
Track post-sale work items
Faster service coordination
Show 2 more scenarios
CRM and systems integrators
Automate data exchange
Less duplicate data entry
Uses integration surfaces to sync dealer entities and trigger recurring workflow actions.
IT and dealership governance
Control access and changes
Stronger internal controls
Applies RBAC and audit logs to govern who can configure workflows and approve actions.
Best for: Fits when multi-team dealerships need standardized deal workflows with RBAC and audit trails.
More related reading
Nexpart
SMBParts ordering and dealer management for agricultural equipment.
Workflow configuration for service and parts execution with automated handoffs via integration and API.
Nexpart fits dealers that want governance over day-to-day execution, such as standardized intake for service work and structured parts ordering. Workflow configuration supports role-based execution across sales and service so staff follow consistent steps during quoting, ordering, and job tracking. Integration depth matters when the dealer ecosystem includes accounting, e-commerce, telematics, or data feeds, since Nexpart must coordinate record updates across multiple sources.
A tradeoff shows up when organizations need highly bespoke UI changes or custom screens without relying on configuration tools and integration work. Nexpart works well for teams that prioritize repeatable workflows and automated data movement, such as service advisors routing work orders and parts teams reconciling availability and order status.
- +Workflow-first configuration supports consistent quoting, ordering, and job routing
- +API and integration surface supports automated record sync across connected tools
- +Unified customer, inventory, and job tracking reduces cross-team rework
- +Admin controls support structured roles for sales and service processes
- –Deeper customization can require integration work beyond standard configuration
- –Complex dealer setups may need more admin time for correct process tuning
- –Reporting depth depends on how workflows and fields are modeled
Service operations managers
Route jobs with consistent intake steps
Fewer handoff errors and delays
Parts department managers
Coordinate parts ordering and availability
Improved fill rates and visibility
Show 2 more scenarios
Dealer IT and systems teams
Integrate DMS with dealer ecosystem
Lower manual data entry
Uses API access to automate data movement between operational tools and downstream systems.
Sales operations teams
Manage quotes tied to inventory
Faster quote to order cycles
Coordinates customer records with inventory and downstream actions to keep sales and ops aligned.
Best for: Fits when dealers need configurable workflow control plus API-driven system synchronization across sales, service, and parts.
DealerCenter
SMBWeb-based dealer management system for equipment and auto dealers.
Deal workflow status management tied to lead records for structured follow-up.
DealerCenter centers on end-to-end dealer execution, linking lead intake to appointment handling, deal progress, and sales communications. Inventory presentation and related workflows reduce manual handoffs by keeping product context attached to each deal record. The system’s configuration and automation surface supports repeated processes like follow-up sequences and status changes, which reduces operator-by-operator variability.
A tradeoff appears in workflow rigidity when operations require custom approval chains or unusual data capture for specific ag lines. Dealer teams doing frequent one-off manual adjustments may need additional configuration work to match their exact process map. DealerCenter fits best when a dealership wants consistent lead-to-deal processing across multiple users and locations, without building new software components.
- +Lead-to-deal tracking ties follow-ups to deal status
- +Inventory and merchandising context stays connected to deals
- +Workflow automation reduces repetitive sales admin work
- +Configuration supports multi-user dealer operations
- –Less flexible for highly custom approvals and data capture
- –Integrations can require mapping work for nonstandard fields
- –Power users may need training for advanced workflow configuration
Ag sales managers
Oversee pipelines across sales reps
More consistent conversion timing
Parts and service coordinators
Route customer requests to deals
Reduced lost context
Show 1 more scenario
Operations and admin teams
Standardize dealer workflows
Lower process variance
Configure roles and repeatable automation patterns for appointment and follow-up steps.
Best for: Fits when ag dealers need consistent lead-to-deal workflows across staff and locations.
Trimble Agriculture
enterpriseEnterprise-grade farm and ag dealer management platform.
Workflow-driven service records that link agronomy and equipment outcomes to dealer follow-up tasks.
Trimble Agriculture focuses on ag dealer operations tied to precision agriculture workflows, using data and field results to drive service and customer management. Core capabilities center on dealer-facing tools for lead handling, customer and account management, and connecting agronomy and equipment support to documented work activity.
Automation centers on routing tasks to the right teams and keeping records aligned with field and service outcomes. Integration depth typically shows up through Trimble ecosystem data flows and APIs aimed at connecting mobile, equipment, and back-office systems.
- +Ties service activity records to agronomy and field outcomes
- +Automation supports task routing and follow-up based on workflow status
- +Integration options align with Trimble equipment and data sources
- +Dealer records stay connected across customer and service touchpoints
- –Administration requires familiarity with Trimble-centric configuration
- –Complex dealer setups can need more process design to avoid manual work
- –API and automation coverage may be narrower than general CRM-style suites
- –Less suited for dealers that do not run Trimble field or equipment workflows
Best for: Fits when dealers need connected service workflows tied to field and equipment data.
CDK Global
enterpriseDealer management system for equipment, agriculture, and heavy-duty industries.
Role-based access controls applied across dealer workflows for sales and service users.
CDK Global supports dealer operations with CRM-style customer and lead handling, inventory visibility, and order workflows that connect sales and service tasks. It provides role-based access controls for day-to-day users and managers, plus audit-oriented records that help track operational changes.
Dealer-centric automation handles recurring tasks like lead follow-up, appointment scheduling, and work order progression across departments. The system fits multi-location environments where configuration, user governance, and integration with surrounding tools matter.
- +Dealer-focused workflows tie sales leads to service execution steps
- +Role-based access and structured permissions support operational governance
- +Built-in activity tracking supports auditability for key dealer actions
- +Automation reduces manual handoffs between sales and service teams
- –Admin configuration and permissions management can take sustained effort
- –Cross-department process mapping requires careful rollout planning
- –UI depth can slow navigation for users who need only one module
- –Integration outcomes depend heavily on the connected toolchain design
Best for: Fits when multi-department dealer teams need governed workflows spanning leads, inventory, and work order progression.
PFW (Produce and Farm Wholesale)
enterpriseERP and dealer management for agricultural equipment dealers.
Dealer order processing tied to fulfillment execution across inventory and shipment activities.
PFW (Produce and Farm Wholesale) targets produce and farm distribution workflows with dealer-facing order, pricing, and inventory processes. It is built around wholesale trading activities such as order capture, sourcing coordination, and shipment execution tied to distributor operations.
Core capabilities center on day-to-day dealer management tasks including order processing, availability tracking, and customer-specific commercial handling. Governance is handled through role-based administration and operational auditability needed for shared dealer and back-office environments.
- +Wholesale workflow alignment for produce dealer order processing
- +Inventory and availability handling tied to fulfillment execution
- +Customer and dealer transaction handling for commercial operations
- +Administration supports multi-user control for dealer operations
- –Limited public detail on API and integration depth
- –Feature coverage may skew toward distributor workflows
- –Automation options are harder to validate from documentation
- –Reporting depth and audit-log granularity are not clearly documented
Best for: Fits when produce distributors need dealer order and inventory workflows with admin controls.
AgDealer
SMBOnline marketplace and dealer management tools for agricultural equipment.
Workflow-driven tasking that links deal stages to service and operations execution.
AgDealer is an ag dealer management system that centers on deal tracking and customer records for equipment, parts, and service workflows. It connects sales activity to order and service execution so the team can see status across the customer lifecycle.
The system focuses on configurable workflows, user permissions, and operational auditability for internal governance. AgDealer also supports automation through tasking and process templates tied to dealer operations.
- +Deal-to-service visibility reduces manual status updates between teams
- +Configurable workflows support dealer-specific processes and routing
- +Role-based access controls keep sensitive customer and pricing data restricted
- +Operational tasking ties execution steps to specific deals
- –Automation options can require careful workflow configuration to avoid rework
- –Reporting depth depends on the setup of fields and workflow states
- –Integrations require deliberate data mapping for consistent customer records
- –Navigation can feel deal-centric when users need cross-module views
Best for: Fits when dealers need one system to connect deal tracking, service work, and customer history.
ProfitMaster
SMBDealer management system for agricultural and outdoor power equipment.
Sales order status tracking tied to inventory availability for tighter fulfillment coordination.
ProfitMaster supports ag dealer management workflows with inventory, pricing, and order tracking built around dealership operations. The system is structured for day-to-day sales execution, including item availability and sales order status visibility.
ProfitMaster also includes management reporting aimed at operational monitoring across locations and departments. Admin configuration controls how users work through core processes, with governance tools that support consistent execution.
- +Inventory and sales order tracking aligned to dealership day-to-day workflows
- +Operational reporting supports visibility into sales execution and movement over time
- +Pricing and availability handling reduces manual coordination across processes
- +Admin configuration supports consistent process execution across roles
- –Limited depth in advanced automation compared with higher-ranked systems
- –API and extensibility capabilities are not clearly positioned for heavy custom integrations
- –Role governance and audit details appear less granular than top competitors
- –Workflow setup can require more effort to match unique dealership process variations
Best for: Fits when mid-size ag dealerships need core inventory-to-order control with operational reporting and role-based access.
Maddox
SMBDealer management system for agricultural and equipment dealers.
Configurable workflow automation that connects customer, quote, and order execution to dealer record updates in one flow.
Maddox handles core dealer management workflows for ag operations, including customer and order processing tied to equipment and inventory activities. It focuses on managing dealer-specific business records such as customer profiles, quotes, orders, parts or inventory movements, and related documents in one operational flow.
Automation support centers on configurable processes that reduce manual rekeying between sales, service, and fulfillment steps. Integration options and an API surface are used to connect dealer systems and extend data movement across connected tools.
- +Configured workflows reduce rekeying across sales and fulfillment steps
- +Customer, order, and inventory records stay linked for traceability
- +API and integrations support data movement to connected dealer systems
- +Document handling supports day-to-day execution around deals
- –Admin configuration can require detailed setup to match dealer processes
- –Reporting depth depends on how data fields are mapped
- –Some governance controls need careful role definition
- –UI navigation can feel dense when managing high-volume records
Best for: Fits when mid-size ag dealers need configurable workflows with integration support across sales, service, and inventory.
Lightspeed NXT
enterpriseDMS for agricultural equipment dealers.
Connected quoting and ordering tied to shared inventory and customer records, driven through configurable automation.
Lightspeed NXT is an ag dealer management system built around dealer operations workflows instead of generic back-office functions. Inventory, sales, and service records are connected through a shared customer and product context, which reduces duplicate entry across departments.
The solution supports configuration and automation for common dealer processes like quoting and order handling. Integration and extensibility matter for dealer-scale deployments because NXT’s API and system connectors affect data flow between accounting, EDI, and other operational tools.
- +Integrated customer, inventory, and order workflows reduce repeated data entry
- +Automation supports common dealer tasks like quotes to orders
- +API and connectors support bidirectional system integration needs
- +Role-based administration supports day-to-day governance
- –Workflow setup can require admin time to match dealer-specific process steps
- –Reporting needs more configuration than tools focused on analytics out of the box
- –Advanced field-level customization can increase ongoing configuration overhead
- –Third-party integration depth depends on connector maturity for specific systems
Best for: Fits when ag dealerships need connected sales, service, and inventory workflows with integration-led operations.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 agriculture farming, Equip by NetSol stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right ag dealer management software
This guide covers how to choose ag dealer management software for quoting, ordering, inventory execution, service handoffs, and customer record governance across agriculture dealerships. Included tools are Equip by NetSol, Nexpart, DealerCenter, Trimble Agriculture, CDK Global, PFW, AgDealer, ProfitMaster, Maddox, and Lightspeed NXT.
The focus is on integration depth, workflow configuration mechanics, and admin controls that support auditability and role-based access. It also highlights where each tool’s automation surface and API-driven syncing tends to fit dealer operating models.
Ag dealer workflow management software for leads to orders to service and fulfillment stages
Ag dealer management software coordinates dealer operations across customer records, inventory and product context, sales quoting, order execution, and post-sale service activity. The core work is mapping workflow stages so staff move deals through fulfillment and service steps without manual status reentry.
Agronomy-oriented dealers often need service records tied to field outcomes, which is a strength of Trimble Agriculture. Multi-team dealers that standardize quote-to-post-sale execution with RBAC and audit history often match Equip by NetSol’s workflow orchestration.
Evaluation criteria tied to dealer workflow orchestration and integration control
The fastest way to misfit an ag DMS is picking a tool that models workflows differently than the dealership’s actual stages for quoting, ordering, parts, and service. Each tool below shows a distinct workflow approach, from Nexpart’s service and parts execution to DealerCenter’s lead-to-deal status management.
Deal governance matters because dealer teams need controlled configuration and traceability for transactions and admin actions. Equip by NetSol, CDK Global, and AgDealer emphasize RBAC and auditability, while other tools trade off governance depth for narrower execution coverage.
Deal workflow orchestration that carries execution across fulfillment and service stages
Equip by NetSol is built around configurable deal workflow orchestration that carries orders through fulfillment and service stages with controlled access and audit history. AgDealer also links deal stages to service and operations execution through workflow-driven tasking, which reduces manual status transfers.
Service and parts workflow execution with automated handoffs via integration and API
Nexpart focuses on workflow-first configuration for service and parts execution and automated handoffs via its integration and API access. This structure is designed for teams that need consistent job routing and parts coordination across departments.
Lead-to-deal status tracking tied to follow-up tasks
DealerCenter ties lead capture to deal workflow status management so follow-up actions stay attached to lead records. That design reduces breakage between sales pipeline work and downstream deal progress tracking.
Agronomy-connected service records that link field outcomes to dealer follow-up
Trimble Agriculture connects dealer-facing service activity records to agronomy and field outcomes and routes tasks based on workflow status. This alignment is designed for dealers whose service work depends on field and equipment context.
Role-based access controls across sales and service workflows with audit-oriented activity tracking
CDK Global applies role-based access controls across dealer workflows for sales and service users and includes activity tracking for key dealer actions. Equip by NetSol also pairs workflow orchestration with role-based access and auditability for transaction and administrative actions.
Inventory-to-order status visibility aligned to day-to-day fulfillment coordination
ProfitMaster emphasizes sales order status tracking tied to inventory availability to coordinate fulfillment movement over time. PFW also connects dealer order processing to fulfillment execution across inventory and shipment activities for produce and farm wholesale operations.
Workflow mapping plus integration fit: choose the DMS that matches the dealership’s stage model
A practical selection process starts with the dealership’s real stage model for quote, order, parts or service jobs, and post-sale tasks. Then the tool’s workflow configuration approach must match that stage model with minimal field remapping and minimal custom approval work.
Integration and automation surface should also match the dealership’s system boundaries. Tools like Nexpart and Equip by NetSol emphasize API-driven syncing and automation hooks, while other options may require heavier mapping work when dealer fields and approvals diverge from the tool’s standard structures.
Map the dealer’s execution stages and match them to each tool’s workflow mechanics
Write out the exact stages for quote to order and for order to service, including where tasks are created and who receives them. Equip by NetSol matches teams that want workflow orchestration carrying orders through fulfillment and service with audit history, while AgDealer ties deal stages to service and operations execution through workflow-driven tasking.
Validate service and parts handoffs using Nexpart-style workflow-first configuration
If service and parts coordination are central, confirm the workflow system supports service and parts execution and automated handoffs rather than only status tracking. Nexpart is structured for service and parts process control with API and integration-driven syncing between connected tools.
Check lead-to-deal linkage for sales teams that run follow-ups off lead records
If sales follow-up must stay attached to lead records and move through statuses without manual copywork, compare DealerCenter’s lead-to-deal tracking and task-based follow-up. This is especially relevant when multiple staff roles update the same pipeline from lead capture through deal progression.
Require governance fit by testing RBAC plus auditability against internal administration workflows
If dealership leadership needs controlled configuration and traceability for transaction changes and administrative actions, prioritize tools with RBAC and auditability. Equip by NetSol provides role-based access and auditability across transaction and administrative actions, while CDK Global applies role-based access controls across sales and service workflows with audit-oriented activity tracking.
Confirm agronomy and equipment data alignment before committing to Trimble Agriculture
For dealers running agronomy-connected service workflows, verify that the service records link to field and equipment outcomes and that task routing uses the connected workflow status. Trimble Agriculture is designed around agronomy and field outcomes linked to dealer follow-up tasks, which can become manual work if the dealership does not operate with that same context.
Stress-test integration mapping effort for nonstandard dealer fields and multi-system toolchains
If the dealership uses nonstandard customer fields or custom approval data, plan for mapping work when integrations connect systems. Nexpart’s deeper customization can require integration work beyond standard configuration, and CDK Global notes integration outcomes depend on connected toolchain design, so mapping complexity can surface during rollout.
Which dealerships match the architecture of each ag dealer management tool
Ag DMS fit depends on whether the dealership’s operating model is stage-based execution with strict governance, workflow-first service and parts coordination, agronomy-connected service work, or lead-centric follow-up across locations. The tools below are best matched to the specific dealership needs described in their best-fit profiles.
Each segment also implies a different implementation emphasis. Some tools prioritize RBAC and audit trails for standardized multi-team execution, while others prioritize workflow configuration and API sync for cross-department handoffs.
Multi-team agriculture dealerships that require standardized quote-to-post-sale execution with RBAC
Equip by NetSol fits multi-team dealers that need configurable deal workflow orchestration carrying orders through fulfillment and service stages with controlled access and audit history. This segment aligns with Equip by NetSol’s emphasis on role-based access and auditability for transaction and admin actions.
Dealers that need service and parts job execution with automated handoffs across systems
Nexpart fits dealers focused on service and parts process control where handoffs must be automated through integration and API access. Its workflow-centric service and parts execution supports consistent job routing and reduces cross-team rework.
Ag dealers that run pipeline follow-ups off lead records across staff and locations
DealerCenter fits when consistent lead-to-deal workflows and task-based follow-up are required for multiple users and locations. Its deal workflow status management tied to lead records helps sales teams keep follow-ups aligned with deal progress.
Dealers whose service work is tied to agronomy and field outcomes
Trimble Agriculture fits dealers that connect agronomy and field results to service activity records and follow-up tasks. This requirement matches Trimble Agriculture’s workflow-driven service records linked to agronomy and equipment outcomes.
Produce distributors and wholesale operations that need order capture tied to shipment execution
PFW fits produce and farm wholesale environments where dealer order processing must connect to availability and fulfillment execution across inventory and shipment activities. Its wholesale workflow alignment targets daily execution with role-based admin control.
Implementation and workflow pitfalls seen across ag dealer management deployments
Common failure modes come from picking a tool that does not match the dealership’s stage model, or from treating workflow configuration as a minor setup task. Several tools also show that reporting depth and integration success depend on how fields and workflow states are modeled during configuration.
Governance and mapping effort can also become blockers when user roles and approvals are not clearly defined before rollout. The pitfalls below tie directly to the constraints and cons described for specific tools.
Over-mapping custom approvals and unique fields before validating the core stage model
Treat workflow stages as the first system contract before customizing approvals and data capture. Equip by NetSol and CDK Global both require structured onboarding or careful rollout planning for configuration and permissions, so stage mismatch can create extra admin overhead.
Assuming service and parts automation will work without integration-driven handoffs
Service and parts automation needs workflow handoffs that can sync to connected systems. Nexpart is designed for automated handoffs via integration and API, while AgDealer’s workflow-driven tasking still depends on careful workflow configuration to avoid rework if handoffs are not mapped.
Underestimating admin time needed for workflow tuning in complex dealer setups
Complex dealer setups often require sustained admin time for correct process tuning. Nexpart notes that complex setups can need more admin time for process tuning, and Lightspeed NXT highlights that workflow setup can require admin time to match dealer-specific process steps.
Configuring reporting expectations without aligning fields and workflow states
Reporting depth often depends on how workflows and fields are modeled. ProfitMaster provides operational reporting for monitoring, but tools like AgDealer and Nexpart indicate reporting depth depends on field and workflow setup, so report requirements should be validated during configuration.
Choosing a DMS without confirming integration mapping feasibility for nonstandard dealer records
Integration outcomes depend on mapping complexity between dealer records and connected systems. DealerCenter and Maddox both indicate integrations require mapping work for consistent customer records, so field mapping effort should be planned during integration design.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Equip by NetSol, Nexpart, DealerCenter, Trimble Agriculture, CDK Global, PFW, AgDealer, ProfitMaster, Maddox, and Lightspeed NXT on features coverage, ease of use, and value for ag dealer workflow execution. Features carried the most weight at forty percent, while ease of use and value each accounted for thirty percent in the overall score. This editorial research uses the tool capabilities, onboarding constraints, integration notes, and governance mechanics described in the provided review materials and does not rely on hands-on lab testing or private benchmark experiments.
Equip by NetSol separated from the lower-ranked tools through configurable deal workflow orchestration that carries orders through fulfillment and service stages with controlled access and audit history. That capability directly lifted the features factor because it ties deal progression, governance, and traceability into one workflow execution path.
Frequently Asked Questions About ag dealer management software
How do ag dealer management platforms handle workflow orchestration across sales, service, and fulfillment stages?
Which platforms provide API access and integration hooks for syncing dealer data between systems?
What capabilities support user governance, RBAC, and audit logs for multi-user dealerships?
How do products migrate existing customer and inventory records into a new dealer management system?
What admin controls exist for configuring dealer processes without code changes?
How do ag dealer systems connect field or precision agriculture outcomes to service and customer follow-up?
Which tools are designed for stronger lead-to-deal pipeline tracking for sales staff?
How do systems handle inventory availability and sales order progression in the same workflow?
What extensibility options matter when dealerships must integrate accounting, EDI, and document workflows?
Which platform fits produce and farm wholesale scenarios with shipment execution and customer-specific commercial handling?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Agriculture Farming alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of agriculture farming tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare agriculture farming tools→