GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Non Profit Public SectorTop 10 Best Advocacy Software of 2026
Top 10 roundup compares advocacy software options like ActionKit for teams, features, and tradeoffs to shortlist the right fit.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Grassroots Unwired is the best pick for grassroots teams running recurring legislative or petition drives because it turns new advocate recruits into ready-to-act participants through campaign-specific onboarding sequences and action routing, while ActionKit fits teams that want API-driven consistency across supporter and CRM workflows since it orchestrates onboarding states into executed actions.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Grassroots Unwired
Campaign-specific supporter and advocate onboarding sequences that route new advocates into ready-to-act steps.
Best for: Fits when grassroots teams run recurring legislative or petition campaigns and need structured advocate onboarding and action workflows.
ActionKit
Editor pickActionKit’s campaign workflow orchestration links advocate onboarding states to action execution and routing rules.
Best for: Fits when advocacy teams need consistent advocate workflows with API-driven integrations into supporter and CRM systems.
Quorum
Editor pickAction templates that bind channel delivery to supporter records and governance controls across the campaign lifecycle.
Best for: Fits when teams need governed advocacy workflows that tie actions to supporter data across channels.
Comparison Table
Grassroots Unwired
vertical specialistGrassroots Unwired provides mobile advocacy, canvassing, volunteer management, and grassroots engagement software.
Campaign-specific supporter and advocate onboarding sequences that route new advocates into ready-to-act steps.
Grassroots Unwired targets advocacy teams that need communications and volunteer coordination tied to campaign objectives. It combines advocate recruitment and onboarding workflows with action execution tools like email and form-based petition support.
Campaign staff can segment audiences for outreach and track performance at the supporter level. Built for field programs, it also supports coalition and event-driven coordination through repeatable campaign steps.
- +Advocate onboarding workflows reduce manual follow-ups for new recruits
- +Segmentation supports targeted outreach across multiple campaign audiences
- +Action workflows support common advocacy outputs like petition and message sharing
- +Campaign reporting connects outreach activities to supporter responses
- –Complex workflows need careful configuration to stay consistent across campaigns
- –Advanced automations depend on disciplined data hygiene in supporter records
- –API and extensibility surface is narrower than systems built for CRM-grade integration
- –Some multi-channel orchestration requires additional process steps inside campaigns
Best for: Fits when grassroots teams run recurring legislative or petition campaigns and need structured advocate onboarding and action workflows.
ActionKit
API-firstActionKit provides advocacy campaigns, petitions, email messaging, fundraising, and supporter management tools.
ActionKit’s campaign workflow orchestration links advocate onboarding states to action execution and routing rules.
ActionKit coordinates advocacy campaigns from advocate profiles to action execution, with tooling aimed at recruiting, onboarding, and converting supporters. Core capabilities include action alerts, petition and letter-style actions, and multi-channel sharing flows that connect supporter data to campaign tasks.
Administrators get workflow controls for segmenting advocates, routing actions, and managing campaign configuration across teams. An extensibility layer for API access and automation supports integration with external constituent and CRM systems.
- +Advocate onboarding workflows map supporter data to action steps
- +Action alerts and petition-style actions support structured campaign messaging
- +API and automation surface supports integrations with external supporter systems
- +Configuration controls help maintain consistency across campaign workflows
- –Campaign configuration can become complex for multi-team governance
- –Advanced segmentation requires careful advocate data hygiene
- –Custom integrations can add engineering overhead
- –Reporting depth depends on the actions and events instrumented
Best for: Fits when advocacy teams need consistent advocate workflows with API-driven integrations into supporter and CRM systems.
Quorum
enterpriseQuorum provides advocacy, public affairs, stakeholder engagement, and legislative monitoring software.
Action templates that bind channel delivery to supporter records and governance controls across the campaign lifecycle.
Quorum pairs advocacy campaign execution with structured member and supporter records, so teams can run recruitment to engagement in one workflow. Campaigns are configured with audience targeting, action templates, and channel-specific delivery such as email and web actions.
Quorum also emphasizes governance through role-based access controls and audit-style traceability for administrative changes. Integration options and an API surface support data synchronization with external systems used for constituent or CRM data.
- +Campaign actions connect directly to advocate and supporter records
- +Configurable action flows reduce manual handoffs during execution
- +API supports data synchronization for constituent and campaign systems
- +RBAC and admin controls support governed campaign operations
- –Complex workflows require careful setup to avoid audience drift
- –Advanced automation depends on integration work with external systems
- –Reporting depth can lag for highly customized engagement metrics
- –Template-led actions can constrain atypical advocacy formats
Best for: Fits when teams need governed advocacy workflows that tie actions to supporter data across channels.
VoterVoice
enterpriseVoterVoice provides digital advocacy, grassroots campaigns, legislative alerts, and policy engagement tools.
District matching that links legislative tracking context to which supporters see each action alert.
VoterVoice ties supporter capture and subsequent actions to issue and location context, which helps teams run legislative campaigns with bill monitoring and targeted outreach. The workflow model supports petition campaigns and action alerts that move supporters from sign-up to advocacy steps without switching tools. Campaign reporting focuses on engagement outcomes tied to these actions so teams can refine targeting for later waves.
- +Legislative targeting routes actions using supporter location context
- +Campaign workflows connect petition collection to follow-on advocacy steps
- +Engagement reporting ties outcomes to specific action alerts
- +Operational governance supports permissions for campaign execution
- –Workflow structure can limit highly custom supporter journey designs
- –Advanced segmentation may require careful data hygiene for districts
- –Integration depth depends on how supporter data maps to platform fields
- –Some automation patterns take longer to configure than generic CRM tools
Legislative advocacy teams
Run bill-driven action alert series
Improved action conversion rates
Grassroots program managers
Operate petition to follow-up emails
Higher supporter engagement
Show 2 more scenarios
Constituent data operators
Sync supporter records with CRM
Fewer misrouted actions
Keep supporter location fields consistent for constituent matching across campaigns.
Coalition coordinators
Manage multi-org advocacy campaigns
Reduced operational errors
Use governance controls to coordinate lists and campaign permissions across teams.
Best for: Fits when legislative campaigns need district matching and action workflows with ongoing supporter follow-up.
FiscalNote
enterpriseGovernment relations platform combining advocacy, stakeholder mobilization, and legislative tracking.
Bill and stakeholder intelligence that drives action routing through alert-based workflows rather than static advocacy calendars.
FiscalNote is a policy intelligence and legislation workflow system built around tracking bills, regulators, and stakeholders instead of running advocacy outreach from scratch. It centralizes campaign context and targets by combining legislative monitoring with constituent and geography-oriented signals for outreach planning.
- +Legislative tracking that ties bill status to stakeholder and action planning
- +Integration-focused automation to route intelligence into campaign workflows
- +Role-based access controls for shared advocacy operations
- +Audit log support for changes across collaborative workspaces
- –Less direct focus on day-to-day advocate recruitment workflows than advocacy-first tools
- –Setup requires careful configuration of filters, jurisdictions, and targeting rules
- –Automation design can feel complex without defined campaign process ownership
- –Reporting depth depends on how well external systems sync supporter context
Best for: Fits when policy intelligence needs to feed legislative campaigns with controlled, tracked workflow handoffs.
OneClickPolitics
vertical specialistOneClickPolitics provides advocacy action centers, messaging campaigns, petitions, and legislative engagement tools.
Contact-level campaign segmentation that routes supporters into tailored action steps without rebuilding lists each cycle.
OneClickPolitics fits teams running legislative campaigns that need consistent advocate onboarding, action alert delivery, and supporter journey management across repeated events. Advocate recruitment is handled as a workflow that turns incoming signups into segmented groups tied to specific campaign goals. Campaign execution also supports action conversion tracking at the contact and campaign level, which helps teams refine outreach sequences.
- +Action alert workflows connect recruit-to-action execution tightly
- +Campaign segmentation supports routing contacts into next steps
- +Legislative tracking focus aligns with bill monitoring cycles
- +Operational controls support multi-user campaign coordination
- –Segmentation accuracy depends on upstream mapping inputs
- –Advanced workflows require deliberate configuration of campaign lists
- –Deep CRM synchronization is not the core strength
- –Data design flexibility for custom schemas is limited
Legislative campaign managers
Bill monitoring action alerts and follow-ups
Higher action conversion across cycles
Advocacy operations teams
Recruitment to onboarding workflow
Faster onboarding throughput
Show 2 more scenarios
Coalition staff coordinators
Multi-user campaign execution control
Fewer handoff errors
Coordinate outreach tasks across staff roles managing shared campaign lists.
Digital program leads
Action conversion optimization by segment
Better segment-level performance
Review action completion by segment to adjust which contacts get which next step.
Best for: Fits when legislative teams need repeatable advocate-to-action workflows with segmentation.
Bonterra Mobilize
enterpriseMobilize provides event, volunteer, and grassroots engagement software for advocacy organizations.
Campaign staff routing tied to each action step, so advocate responses and engagement events flow into follow-up work queues.
Bonterra Mobilize is an advocacy case management and action execution system built around volunteer and supporter engagement workflows. It supports multi-channel action delivery such as email, SMS, social sharing, and click-to-call style actions tied to campaign goals.
- +Action workflows map outreach steps to staff routing and follow-up tasks
- +Multi-channel action formats cover email, SMS, social sharing, and phone outreach
- +Campaign operations benefit from role-based access and separation of duties
- +Advocacy analytics connect engagement history to active campaign performance
- –Workflow configuration takes planning to avoid duplicate advocate assignments
- –API and automation tooling surface is less extensive than CRM-first vendors
- –Complex targeting depends on good source data hygiene in connected systems
Best for: Fits when advocacy teams need configurable action workflows and staff routing without building custom systems.
Blackbaud Luminate Online
enterpriseBlackbaud Luminate Online supports nonprofit advocacy, fundraising, digital engagement, and constituent communications.
Built-in campaign action workflow design connects supporter lifecycle steps to completion events used in reporting.
Blackbaud Luminate Online manages advocate-facing campaigns by combining segmentation, personalized messaging, and action workflows in one operational system. It supports recruitment and onboarding flows that feed into supporter data updates, then routes supporters into specific campaign actions like petitions, calls, and email advocacy.
- +End-to-end campaign workflows connect recruitment to action completion tracking.
- +Segmentation rules drive personalized templates for email and digital action pages.
- +Campaign reports map engagement events back to targeting and messaging variants.
- +Role-based access controls separate build, data, and reporting responsibilities.
- –Complex campaign logic can require more training than simpler advocacy tools.
- –Automation coverage depends heavily on configured workflow paths for each action type.
- –Exports for downstream systems can be less flexible than a full event stream.
- –Advanced reporting often reflects the platform's predefined metrics, not custom schemas.
Best for: Fits when advocacy programs need repeatable recruitment, onboarding, and action workflows with controlled access.
The Soft Edge Advocacy
vertical specialistConstituent advocacy and legislative correspondence management system for government relations teams.
Campaign workflows that tie advocate actions to legislative campaigning steps in one execution model.
The Soft Edge Advocacy is a campaign-focused advocacy management system built for running legislative and public-interest action programs with defined supporter steps. It provides advocate and supporter records, workflow-driven action campaigns, and tools for outreach execution across common channels used in grassroots work.
- +Workflow-driven action campaigns map outreach steps to outcomes
- +Campaign and supporter records support consistent advocate journeys
- +Legislative campaign execution fits teams running bill-focused work
- +Reporting connects engagement activity to specific campaign actions
- –Automation and orchestration depth feels narrower than full CRM-style advocacy stacks
- –Data and field modeling flexibility can require disciplined setup work
- –Integration coverage is more limited for custom channel pipelines
- –Audit and admin controls may not match the granularity of enterprise governance suites
Best for: Fits when policy and grassroots teams need structured action workflows tied to legislative campaigning.
Muster
SMBDigital advocacy platform providing action alerts, legislator messaging, and event management.
Status-driven onboarding workflows with automated handoffs from intake review to campaign-ready engagement.
Muster is built around managing advocate records through an onboarding workflow that can attach forms, eligibility rules, and required tasks before an advocate becomes campaign-ready. Campaign operations use configuration-driven action flows for petition and email-style outreach, plus tracking that supports follow-up scheduling. Extensibility comes through API-driven synchronization, which reduces manual list exports when advocates move between campaigns. For teams that need campaign execution tied to internal records, Muster’s integration depth is a practical fit.
- +Workflow automation ties onboarding steps directly to advocate status
- +API supports campaign participant synchronization with external systems
- +Role-based administration separates intake review from execution
- +Configuration supports repeatable campaign action flows
- –Workflow setup can require more upfront mapping than simpler tools
- –Advanced routing logic depends on disciplined configuration
- –Deep customization may require engineering time for integrations
- –Some channel playbooks require extra configuration to match internal processes
advocacy ops teams
Recruit, review, and onboard new advocates
Higher campaign readiness rate
data and integrations teams
Sync advocate records with CRM
Fewer manual list exports
Show 2 more scenarios
campaign managers
Run recurring action workflows
More consistent action delivery
Reusable action configurations keep executions consistent across campaigns.
compliance-focused organizations
Govern who can edit participants
Reduced unauthorized edits
Role-based administration supports controlled changes across recruitment and engagement.
Best for: Fits when advocacy teams need controlled recruitment workflows and API-backed sync to a CRM.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 advocacy software, Grassroots Unwired stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Advocacy Software
Advocacy software for campaigns coordinates advocate recruitment, advocate onboarding, segmentation, and action execution across email, SMS, social sharing, and phone-style outreach. This buyer’s guide covers Muster, OneClickPolitics, VoterVoice, Quorum, Blackbaud Luminate Online, Bonterra Mobilize, FiscalNote, Grassroots Unwired, ActionKit, and The Soft Edge Advocacy.
The tools below differ most in how they connect campaign workflows to supporter records, how they apply district matching or legislative tracking context, and how they automate handoffs across systems. Muster leads with status-driven onboarding workflows that route intake review into campaign-ready engagement steps.
Advocacy Software for campaign workflows, advocate onboarding, and action execution
Advocacy software runs campaign workflows that move supporters and advocates from recruitment or intake into tailored action steps, then ties outcomes back to records for reporting and follow-up. Muster is built around status-driven onboarding workflows that automate handoffs from intake review to campaign-ready engagement, so workflow state directly controls what happens next.
Some platforms focus on legislative execution patterns, where district matching and bill context shape which supporters see which action alerts. VoterVoice uses district matching to connect legislative tracking context to the actions supporters receive, then links petition collection into follow-on advocacy steps.
Advocacy workflow capabilities that map engagement states to actions
Advocacy software becomes operational when campaign workflow state drives what supporters and advocates receive next. The tools below differ most in how they connect recruitment and onboarding stages to action execution, routing, and completion tracking.
Integration depth matters when advocacy teams sync supporter records with a CRM or other systems that already hold identities, affiliations, and history. Automation and API surface also determine whether campaign logic can remain consistent across campaign cycles and data refreshes.
Status-driven onboarding with handoffs into campaign-ready engagement
Muster routes advocates from intake review into campaign-ready engagement steps with status-controlled workflow handoffs. ActionKit also links onboarding states to action execution and routing rules.
Contact-level campaign segmentation that routes into tailored action steps
OneClickPolitics uses contact-level campaign segmentation to route supporters into tailored action steps without rebuilding lists each cycle. Grassroots Unwired supports campaign-specific supporter and advocate onboarding sequences that route new advocates into ready-to-act steps.
District matching tied to legislative context for which actions a supporter sees
VoterVoice uses district matching to connect legislative tracking context to which supporters receive each action alert. ActionKit and The Soft Edge Advocacy both tie campaign workflows to legislative campaigning steps, but VoterVoice adds location-based routing.
Governed action templates that tie delivery and governance controls to supporter records
Quorum provides action templates that bind channel delivery to supporter records while adding governance controls across the campaign lifecycle. Blackbaud Luminate Online also connects end-to-end campaign workflows and completion events into reporting, but with heavier training needs for complex campaign logic.
Action lifecycle reporting driven by completion events and workflow paths
Blackbaud Luminate Online built campaign action workflow design that connects supporter lifecycle steps to completion events used in reporting. Quorum connects campaign actions directly to advocate and supporter records and reduces manual handoffs during execution through configurable action flows.
Legislative intelligence and alert-based routing into tracked workflow handoffs
FiscalNote links bill status and stakeholder intelligence to alert-based workflow handoffs for legislative campaigning. Bonterra Mobilize emphasizes staff routing tied to each action step so advocate responses and engagement events flow into follow-up queues.
Choose Advocacy Software by workflow control depth and routing intelligence
Selecting advocacy software should start with how campaign workflow state gets created and enforced, then how that state triggers routing and execution. Tools like Muster and Quorum keep workflow state as a first-class control surface, while others focus more on segmentation or legislative context.
After workflow control, the decision should narrow on integration and automation needs. Teams that sync with a CRM usually prioritize API-backed campaign participant synchronization and workflow automation surfaces, while teams with clear internal data hygiene can accept more configuration discipline for advanced segmentation.
Map the workflow engine to how the team defines advocate status
If advocate status must determine what happens next from intake review through action execution, Muster fits because status-driven onboarding automates handoffs into campaign-ready engagement steps. If the team needs onboarding states to drive consistent action routing across teams, ActionKit fits because onboarding states map to action steps and routing rules.
Decide whether routing is driven by segmentation logic or district matching
If routing relies on contact-level segmentation rules that move supporters through tailored action steps, OneClickPolitics fits because segmentation routes supporters into next-step action workflows. If routing must depend on location context linked to legislative tracking, VoterVoice fits because district matching determines which action alerts supporters see.
Pick the governance model for multi-channel action templates
If the workflow must include governance controls that govern channel delivery while tying actions to supporter records, Quorum fits because action templates bind delivery to records and governance across the lifecycle. If the organization needs end-to-end campaign workflows that connect recruitment through action completion events for reporting, Blackbaud Luminate Online fits because completion events power lifecycle reporting.
Match staff routing and follow-up needs to the action workflow format
If each action step must assign staff routing and push advocate responses into follow-up queues, Bonterra Mobilize fits because staff routing is tied to each action step and follow-up work queues receive engagement events. If the campaign depends on bill and stakeholder intelligence that triggers alert-based handoffs, FiscalNote fits because it routes actions from legislative tracking signals rather than static calendars.
Validate how much workflow mapping and configuration discipline the team can sustain
If the team can do upfront mapping to connect workflow stages to the right audiences and routing conditions, Muster fits but its workflow setup can require more mapping work than simpler tools. If the team expects repeated campaign cycles with evolving lists, OneClickPolitics reduces rebuild work through campaign segmentation, but segmentation accuracy depends on upstream mapping inputs.
Who advocacy workflow platforms fit best and where they break
Advocacy software fits best when campaigns need repeatable workflow patterns that link recruitment and onboarding to action execution and follow-on work. The strongest fits tie workflow state directly to which supporters see what and when staff handles responses.
Some platforms suit teams with legislative context as a driver for routing. Other platforms suit teams that treat advocate status and governed templates as the core control mechanism, even when the organization runs many campaign audiences and channels.
Advocacy teams building controlled recruitment workflows
Muster fits teams that require intake review to transform into campaign-ready engagement through status-driven onboarding workflows and API-backed CRM synchronization.
Legislative teams needing location-based routing for action alerts
VoterVoice fits legislative campaigns because district matching links legislative tracking context to the actions supporters receive and petition collection drives follow-on advocacy steps.
Campaign teams that run repeatable multi-step communications across channels with governance
Quorum fits teams that need action templates tied to supporter records plus governance controls across the campaign lifecycle, with reduced manual handoffs during execution.
Policy and grassroots operators driven by intelligence-triggered workflow handoffs
FiscalNote fits policy teams because bill and stakeholder intelligence drives alert-based routing into tracked workflow handoffs, while Grassroots Unwired fits teams that need structured onboarding sequences for recurring campaigns.
Common Advocacy Software pitfalls that derail workflow execution
Many failures come from expecting workflow logic to adapt without disciplined configuration. Several tools also require careful setup so automation does not send people to the wrong next action or cause audience drift.
Another frequent issue comes from choosing a product for legislative intelligence when the campaign execution pattern is actually advocate-first and workflow-heavy. The best outcomes usually align the workflow engine and routing intelligence with the operational model the team already runs.
Relying on advanced automation without mapping the workflow-to-audience inputs
Muster can require more upfront mapping than simpler tools, and advanced routing logic depends on disciplined configuration. Quorum workflows also need careful setup to avoid audience drift when execution logic grows complex.
Treating segmentation as accurate without validating upstream mapping quality
OneClickPolitics depends on segmentation accuracy coming from upstream mapping inputs, so weak input mapping produces incorrect routing into action steps. Grassroots Unwired also depends on disciplined data hygiene when advanced automations rely on supporter record consistency.
Choosing legislative intelligence first for a campaign that needs advocate-first recruitment workflows
FiscalNote focuses more on bill and stakeholder intelligence than day-to-day advocate recruitment workflows, so campaigns that need heavy intake and onboarding control may find the fit narrower than advocacy-first tools. Blackbaud Luminate Online also expects training for complex campaign logic so governance-heavy teams should plan for workflow adoption time.
Overextending multi-team governance without simplifying workflow paths
Quorum and ActionKit both support complex orchestration and governance, but complex workflows need careful setup so routing stays consistent across teams. Blackbaud Luminate Online can also require more training than simpler tools because complex campaign logic depends on configured workflow paths for each action type.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Musters, OneClickPolitics, VoterVoice, Quorum, Blackbaud Luminate Online, Bonterra Mobilize, FiscalNote, Grassroots Unwired, ActionKit, and The Soft Edge Advocacy using a features weight of 40% and an ease and value split at 30% each. Feature scoring emphasized how workflow state connects recruitment and onboarding to action execution, routing, and completion tracking, with Muster leading through status-driven onboarding workflows and automated handoffs from intake review to campaign-ready engagement.
Ease and value scoring emphasized how much configuration discipline is required for advanced routing and segmentation logic, where Muster’s advanced routing depends on upfront mapping and Quorum’s complex workflows require careful setup to avoid audience drift. We also weighted integration and automation surfaces when tools explicitly support API-backed synchronization or routing automation that connects campaign participation to external systems.
Frequently Asked Questions About Advocacy Software
How do Muster and ActionKit differ in workflow automation for advocate onboarding?
Which tool provides contact-level segmentation for routing supporters into tailored action steps?
When do teams typically need district matching, and which products support it?
What breaks if an advocacy program lacks an API-backed data sync layer during recruitment?
How do Quorum and Blackbaud Luminate Online handle admin governance for campaign configuration?
What tradeoff appears when a team chooses case management over outreach-only workflow tools?
How do coalition and event-driven coordination workflows differ between Grassroots Unwired and Bonterra Mobilize?
What integration pattern fits legislative monitoring workflows in FiscalNote versus outreach-first systems?
How does SSO and security administration typically show up in advocacy workflow tools like Quorum and Muster?
Where do data migrations commonly fail when moving supporter records into advocacy platforms, and which tools address mapping and sync?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Non Profit Public SectorTop 10 Best Lobbying Software of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Advocate Marketing Software of 2026
- Non Profit Public SectorTop 10 Best Political Fundraising Software of 2026
- Non Profit Public SectorTop 10 Best Advancement Software of 2026
- Policy Government MattersTop 10 Best Public Engagement Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Non Profit Public Sector alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of non profit public sector tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare non profit public sector tools→