GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Digital Products And Software

Top 10 Best AuthPro Alternatives in 2026

IAM and sign-in workflow options for gating access without rebuilding every auth integration

27 min readEditorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Gitnux editors write the brief first: the topic, the inclusion rules, and the frame for what belongs.

02Source Research

Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

AuthPro is an identity and access management service that handles sign-in flows, user session behavior, and access control hooks for digital products. This list helps operators and technical evaluators compare alternatives that fit different integration models, from app-facing authentication APIs to membership and account platforms with built-in gating.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

member-only content gating with hosted entitlements

1

Memberful

Hosted membership entitlements drive content gating for member-only site access.

Fits when publishers need hosted membership entitlements to gate member-only website content.

membership login tied to paid subscriptions

2

Outseta

Outseta is strong for membership login tied to paid status, weak when auth must run independently of billing.

Fits when membership businesses need login, subscriptions, and customer management to gate access.

passwordless or custom application sign-in via APIs

3

Stytch

Stytch’s authentication APIs support configurable application sign-in and identity gating, replacing hosted login flows.

Fits when Windows teams build passwordless or custom app sign-in with API-driven session control.

The product you're replacing

AuthPro

authpro.com
Visit

AuthPro is an identity and access management service that manages user authentication workflows for digital products. Its primary job is to handle sign-in, user session behavior, and access control hooks so apps can validate identity and gate protected actions.

Why people switch
  • → Teams leave because the platform’s administration and configuration options feel constrained for their growing governance needs.
  • → Teams leave due to integration overhead when their app architecture requires deeper automation and more extensive API surface for identity-driven workflows.
  • → Teams leave because pricing and packaging for authentication services do not match expected growth or multi-app usage patterns.
Stay with AuthPro if
  • → Keep AuthPro when the primary requirement is authentication and session handling for a small to mid-sized application set.
  • → Keep AuthPro when app-level authorization logic is feasible and identity integration needs stay within standard sign-in and session behaviors.

Comparison Table

1
MemberfulMid-range
Publishers and creators selling member-only website content.
9.4
Overall
2
OutsetaMid-range
Membership businesses that need login, subscriptions, and customer management.
9.1
Overall
3
StytchFree tier
Development teams building passwordless or custom application sign-in.
8.8
Overall
4
MemberPressMid-range
WordPress sites that need membership access rules and paid subscriptions.
8.5
Overall
5
Auth0Free tier
Teams replacing hosted login with configurable application authentication.
8.1
Overall
6
ClerkFree tier
Developers adding hosted sign-in and user management to web applications.
7.8
Overall
7
FusionAuthFree tier
Teams needing configurable authentication with self-hosted or cloud deployment.
7.5
Overall
8
WorkOSFree tier
SaaS teams adding enterprise SSO and directory integration to application login.
7.2
Overall
9
MemberMouseMid-range
Membership businesses operating on WordPress.
6.9
Overall
10
WordPress sites that need membership levels and protected content.
6.6
Overall
#1

Memberful

vertical specialist

Manages paid memberships and member access for publishers and creators.

9.4/10
Overall
Standout feature

Hosted membership entitlements drive content gating for member-only site access.

Memberful focuses on paywalled membership management for member-only websites, including subscription handling and entitlement checks that gate access to content based on active membership status. It functions as a specialized access-control layer for publishers that need to tie website pages and downloads to membership state without implementing sign-in and session validation logic. As an AuthPro alternative in a content gating workflow, it supports the core requirement of restricting features or pages to paying members, where identity verification happens through the membership lifecycle rather than an app session validation hook.

A concrete tradeoff is that Memberful is not an identity platform for application authentication, so it does not replace AuthPro-style integration patterns that validate logins, issue tokens, or enforce access rules across multiple app clients. It fits best when the primary goal is gating web content and member experiences tied to subscriptions, such as restricting articles, videos, community areas, or digital assets to authenticated members. It also pairs well with a site-centered setup where membership status is the source of truth for authorization decisions rather than fine-grained role and permission checks inside an app backend.

Pros
  • +Hosted membership and paywalled access control for member sites
  • +Membership entitlements map cleanly to gated website content
  • +Designed for publishers selling member-only website access
  • +Specialist focus reduces setup for common membership gating needs
Cons
  • –Not designed to replace AuthPro-style sign-in and session validation
  • –Limited fit for app-centric authentication workflows and access hooks
  • –Less suitable when protected actions require identity-level authorization logic
Use scenarios
  • Indie creators with gated content

    Protect articles and courses by membership

    Fewer manual access reviews

  • Publishers selling subscriptions

    Gate newsletters and premium pages

    Consistent paywall behavior

Show 1 more scenario
  • Community operators with member sites

    Limit access to member-only sections

    Lower integration effort

    Member permissions map to protected content areas without custom auth flows.

Best for: Fits when publishers need hosted membership entitlements to gate member-only website content.

#2

Outseta

SMB

Combines membership management, authentication, billing, and customer records.

9.1/10
Overall
Standout feature

Outseta is strong for membership login tied to paid status, weak when auth must run independently of billing.

Outseta combines authentication-centric workflows with membership and subscriber management, so access control can be backed by membership state rather than stored separately. It supports member login journeys and gated experiences that align with subscription entitlements, which matches AuthPro alternative needs where sign-in and permission checks are tied to account status. Outseta also covers core customer administration for members, which reduces integration work when a system needs both identity-driven access and a single source of truth for member profiles.

A tradeoff is that organizations wanting highly customized auth flows or deep identity-provider features may need additional integration because Outseta is optimized around its own membership and gating model. A common usage situation is an internal or external app portal where users authenticate, then only see routes, features, or pages that map to their active membership. Another situation is a SaaS site that requires member self-service and consistent access gating after login, without building a separate authorization layer on top of the billing-backed membership records.

Pros
  • +Website authentication plus member records for subscription-backed gating
  • +Customer management supports login tied to membership status
  • +Subscription billing aligns protected access with paid state
  • +Specialist focus on membership auth and administration
Cons
  • –Less suitable for auth-only needs without membership billing context
  • –Identity workflows are coupled to member administration requirements
Use scenarios
  • Membership business operators

    Gate member pages by paid status

    Fewer unauthorized access paths

  • Product teams running memberships

    Replace AuthPro-style gating with member auth

    Consistent access control

Show 1 more scenario
  • Subscription support teams

    Administer authenticated customer accounts

    Faster membership corrections

    Manage member identities alongside customer details to reduce support friction for sign-in issues.

Best for: Fits when membership businesses need login, subscriptions, and customer management to gate access.

#3

Stytch

API-first

Offers authentication APIs and user-management tools for applications.

8.8/10
Overall
Standout feature

Stytch’s authentication APIs support configurable application sign-in and identity gating, replacing hosted login flows.

Stytch provides application authentication APIs that let teams define sign-in and session behavior in the app rather than using a hosted identity login UI. The platform supports sign-in flow integration and access-control hooks so backend services can verify identity and enforce authorization before protected actions run.

This approach is a fit for teams building custom passwordless and sign-in experiences where the authentication integration surface is part of the product design. A tradeoff is that the team owns more of the end-to-end user flow wiring, including session and access gating logic, compared with hosted login patterns.

Pros
  • +Authentication APIs for configurable app sign-in and session behavior
  • +Passwordless-focused flows for custom credentialless experiences
  • +Application hooks that support identity checks before protected actions
  • +Developer-first approach for moving beyond hosted login
Cons
  • –Requires deeper app integration than hosted login services
  • –More implementation work for teams that want UI-level turnkey sign-in
Use scenarios
  • Product teams building passwordless login

    Wire identity validation into app gates

    Protected actions only after checks

  • Teams leaving hosted login

    Replace hosted sign-in with APIs

    App-controlled sign-in behavior

Best for: Fits when Windows teams build passwordless or custom app sign-in with API-driven session control.

#4

MemberPress

SMB

A WordPress membership plugin for gated content, subscriptions, and member accounts.

8.5/10
Overall
Standout feature

MemberPress page and file protection tied to membership subscriptions, weak for app-level sign-in session validation like IAM.

MemberPress replaces AuthPro for WordPress-focused access control by handling authentication-adjacent gating through membership rules, not app sign-in flows. It supports paid subscriptions and membership access rules that restrict pages, posts, and downloads based on membership status.

Access control is driven by WordPress roles and membership subscriptions rather than external identity workflows. Integration is anchored in WordPress membership and checkout behavior instead of session validation hooks for custom digital apps.

Pros
  • +Membership gating for WordPress content and downloads based on subscription status
  • +Checkout-backed access control for paid subscriptions and recurring plans
  • +Content protection integrates with WordPress permissions and membership levels
  • +Admin tools for managing members, subscriptions, and access eligibility
Cons
  • –Not designed to manage app sign-in, sessions, or identity verification workflows
  • –Best fit depends on WordPress content protection models
  • –API and automation surface is narrower for non-WordPress identity flows
  • –RBAC granularity for custom apps is limited compared with an IAM workflow

Best for: Fits when Windows teams run WordPress memberships needing paid subscription gating, not external app sign-in sessions.

#5

Auth0

API-first

Provides authentication and identity management for web and mobile applications.

8.1/10
Overall
Standout feature

Auth0 is strong for application authentication flows with token-based access control, weak when teams only need simple page passwords.

Auth0 handles application sign-in and authentication workflows for digital products, including session behavior and access control integration. It supports hosted login and configurable identity flows that apps can call through documented APIs.

Auth0 also provides user, identity, and authorization primitives so applications can gate protected actions based on validated authentication outcomes. RBAC, policies, and audit-style visibility for auth events help teams administer access without custom login pages for every app.

Pros
  • +Hosted login plus configurable application authentication flows
  • +APIs for app sign-in, session management, and token validation
  • +RBAC and policy controls for gating protected actions
  • +Admin configuration for users, identities, and auth settings
Cons
  • –Auth flow configuration can become complex for multi-app setups
  • –Advanced access rules require careful API and claim mapping
  • –Debugging session and token behavior needs deeper protocol knowledge

Best for: Fits when Windows teams need hosted login plus application authentication APIs to gate protected actions.

#6

Clerk

API-first

Provides user authentication, account management, and sign-in interfaces for applications.

7.8/10
Overall
Standout feature

Clerk’s hosted login UI and session APIs reduce custom sign-in work, but app-side authorization still gates actions.

Clerk provides hosted authentication and user management for web apps, replacing custom sign-in flows with an integrated login UI and backend APIs. It supports session-based identity for protected routes and common authentication workflows via configurable endpoints and SDK calls.

The admin side focuses on user records, permissions-related access control patterns, and operational settings that apps can apply through its API. Clerk also provides extensibility points for integrating identity state into app authorization logic.

Pros
  • +Hosted sign-in UI plus APIs for session handling in web apps
  • +User management endpoints to create, update, and control accounts
  • +Configurable auth flows to match product-specific sign-in requirements
  • +Clear API surface for identity state to power protected actions
Cons
  • –OAuth and session behavior can require app-specific integration work
  • –Authorization hooks still need app-side logic for gating protected actions
  • –Admin configuration can be limited for complex, bespoke access rules
  • –Advanced custom UI often increases front-end implementation effort

Best for: Fits when web teams want hosted sign-in and user management to replace custom AuthPro-style flows.

#7

FusionAuth

API-first

Provides customer identity and access management for applications.

7.5/10
Overall
Standout feature

FusionAuth is strong for API-driven sign-in and session gating in custom apps, weak when a turnkey sign-in widget is enough.

FusionAuth is an identity and access management service built for teams that need deeper control over authentication workflows than simple add-on sign-in widgets. It provides configurable sign-in, session behavior, and access control integrations via APIs and extensible configuration.

FusionAuth targets buyers who want to gate application actions based on identity and session state they can tune. It also supports multiple deployment models, including self-hosted options that align with infrastructure-heavy teams.

Pros
  • +Configurable authentication flows with policy-style control for sign-in and sessions
  • +API-first integration for app sign-in and access checks tied to identity state
  • +Self-hosted deployment option for teams that need infrastructure control
  • +Extensibility points for customizing login behavior and workflow steps
Cons
  • –Setup and configuration depth can slow down teams needing quick sign-in only
  • –Admin configuration and workflow tuning require more engineering involvement
  • –Authentication and session customization can increase operational complexity

Best for: Fits when teams need configurable sign-in and session behavior with self-hosted or cloud deployment.

#8

WorkOS

API-first

Provides authentication and enterprise identity features for software applications.

7.2/10
Overall
Standout feature

WorkOS enterprise SSO and directory integrations are strong when identity comes from corporate IdPs.

WorkOS focuses on identity integrations for application login, with enterprise SSO and directory connections as core building blocks. It helps SaaS teams wire sign-in and user access decisions into apps through configurable authentication flows and backend integrations.

Compared with AuthPro-style user session and access control hooks inside product code, WorkOS is strongest when enterprise identity sources like directories and SSO are the primary requirement. WorkOS is also more relevant than generic IAM lists when the integration needs to match existing enterprise sign-in patterns.

Pros
  • +Enterprise SSO and directory integration for app login workflows
  • +Configurable authentication flows designed for web and SaaS sign-in
  • +API-driven integration into application access gating
Cons
  • –Less focused on AuthPro-style session and access hook management
  • –Auth flows may require more engineering work than auth-as-a-widget

Best for: Fits when SaaS teams need enterprise SSO and directory integration in their application sign-in.

#9

MemberMouse

SMB

A WordPress membership platform for gated content, subscriptions, and member management.

6.9/10
Overall
Standout feature

MemberMouse access control links member authentication to protected content using membership and subscription state.

MemberMouse is a WordPress membership platform that pairs member sign-in with content protection and subscription controls. It handles authentication and access gating inside the WordPress experience through its member management features, which fits scenarios where access is the product.

MemberMouse is a paid editor, not a free reader, so it targets paying site owners managing protected digital content. For teams replacing AuthPro, it substitutes for sign-in and session-based access hooks when the app lives in WordPress rather than needing custom identity workflows.

Pros
  • +WordPress-native member authentication tied to protected content rules
  • +Subscription state can drive access limits for gated pages and downloads
  • +Membership roles and permissions support membership-based browsing
  • +Built around membership operations rather than generic authentication APIs
Cons
  • –Not designed as an external identity service for non-WordPress apps
  • –Customization of auth workflows is constrained to its membership model
  • –API and automation options are narrower than IAM focused platforms
  • –Works best when authorization decisions center on MemberMouse-managed content

Best for: Fits when WordPress membership sites need sign-in plus content gating tied to subscription status.

#10

Restrict Content Pro

SMB

A WordPress membership plugin for restricting content and managing subscriptions.

6.6/10
Overall
Standout feature

Restrict Content Pro is strong for gating WordPress content by membership level, weak when app sign-in and session hooks are required.

Restrict Content Pro is a paid WordPress membership and content restriction plugin, not a free reader replacement for AuthPro identity workflows. It gates posts, pages, and downloads based on membership status, then assigns membership levels to manage what signed-in users can access.

It also handles user login integration through WordPress, which is useful when the app needs protected content rather than sign-in protocol hooks. For AuthPro-style access control in custom apps, this focus leaves gaps around app-managed authentication workflows and session token validation.

Pros
  • +WordPress membership levels restrict posts, pages, and downloads by access rules
  • +Admin UI supports member management and level assignment
  • +Works within WordPress login flows for gated content pages
  • +PricingSignal is mid for budget planning on WordPress-based sites
Cons
  • –Not designed to replace AuthPro sign-in and session behavior for custom apps
  • –API surface is limited for app-side identity validation and auth hooks
  • –Membership gating is WordPress-centric, not general-purpose authorization
  • –Audit-style controls are not the focus compared with IAM products

Best for: Fits when WordPress sites need protected content by membership level and member administration instead of IAM for apps.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 authpro alternatives, Memberful stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Memberful

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Before you replace AuthPro

AuthPro handles identity and access management for digital products by managing sign-in, session behavior, and access control hooks. Alternatives to AuthPro usually fit in two lanes: membership-entitlement access control like Memberful and Outseta, or application authentication and token/session validation like Auth0 and Stytch.

Use this guide to map what AuthPro is doing in the buyer’s stack to an alternative that matches the same integration depth needs. Memberful and Outseta fit when access is tied to paid status and hosted membership entitlements, while FusionAuth and Clerk fit when sign-in and session handling must be driven through APIs.

Decision framework for choosing alternatives to AuthPro

Start by identifying whether the replacement must validate identity inside your application through tokens and session behavior, or whether access control primarily maps to membership entitlements and paywalled content. Then confirm whether the preferred integration style is API-driven sign-in flows or hosted login plus app-side gating.

Next, check whether the buyer’s authorization is centralized in the identity layer or distributed in application code. Tools such as Stytch, Auth0, and FusionAuth fit when the app needs strong session and token validation, while Memberful and Outseta fit when paid status and member records drive access outcomes.

  • Identify whether AuthPro is being used for app token and session validation

    If AuthPro is validating tokens and session state for protected actions, Stytch and FusionAuth are built around API-based sign-in and session gating. If hosted login plus application authentication APIs are required, Auth0 provides both hosted login and token validation paths.

  • Decide between hosted login UI and deeper app integration

    If the goal is to replace custom sign-in work with hosted UI, Clerk’s hosted login UI plus session APIs reduces implementation friction. If the buyer wants configurable, app-embedded authentication without relying on a UI-first flow, Stytch and FusionAuth support configurable sign-in behavior through their APIs.

  • Map access control to membership entitlements or identity policies

    If access control is driven by membership entitlements and member-only content pages, Memberful is strong for hosted membership entitlements that map to paywalled site access. If login must tie directly to subscriptions and member administration, Outseta supports website authentication plus customer management that links membership status to login.

  • Check platform fit for WordPress versus external apps

    If protected content is primarily WordPress posts, pages, and downloads, MemberPress, Restrict Content Pro, and MemberMouse align because they connect member authentication to WordPress-native protection rules. If sign-in and session validation must work across non-WordPress apps, these WordPress tools are not designed to replace AuthPro-style external identity workflows.

  • Evaluate enterprise SSO needs separately from AuthPro-like session control

    If the buyer’s main requirement is enterprise SSO and directory integration in a SaaS login workflow, WorkOS is designed for that integration pattern. If the replacement must manage session and access hooks in the app similarly to AuthPro, WorkOS is less focused and FusionAuth or Auth0 are usually a better match.

Pitfalls when switching from AuthPro

Switching away from AuthPro often fails when the buyer optimizes for the wrong integration surface. Hosted membership tools can gate content correctly, but they do not replicate AuthPro-like app sign-in and session validation controls for protected actions.

Auth provider choices also fail when the buyer underestimates how claim mapping, token validation, and multi-app access rules must be wired into the application authorization layer. These mistakes show up when teams move from identity-session control to UI-only sign-in or when WordPress membership protection is used outside WordPress apps.

  • Replacing app token and session validation with membership-only gating

    Choose Stytch, Auth0, or FusionAuth when AuthPro is being used to validate sign-in and session state for protected actions. Use Memberful or Outseta only when the gating model maps primarily to membership entitlements and paid status.

  • Assuming hosted login covers authorization for protected actions

    Clerk provides hosted sign-in UI plus session handling, but app-side logic still gates actions, so protected-resource checks must remain in the application. Auth0 and FusionAuth reduce some authorization wiring through token validation and configurable access controls, but they still require correct claim and rule mapping.

  • Using WordPress membership tools for non-WordPress identity workflows

    MemberPress, MemberMouse, and Restrict Content Pro are built around WordPress-native protection rules tied to membership level. For external apps that need AuthPro-style authentication and session validation, Stytch, Auth0, or FusionAuth are a better match.

  • Selecting enterprise SSO tooling for deep session and access hook control

    WorkOS focuses on enterprise SSO and directory integration, which supports login workflows driven by corporate IdPs. When the replacement must manage session and access hooks like AuthPro for app authorization, Auth0 or FusionAuth fits the integration need better.

Frequently Asked Questions About Alternatives to AuthPro

Which alternative is closest to AuthPro’s role in app-level sign-in and access control hooks?
Stytch, Auth0, Clerk, and FusionAuth cover the app authentication surface more directly than Memberful, MemberPress, or MemberMouse. Stytch uses authentication APIs that teams wire into their own sign-in and session behavior, while Auth0 and Clerk provide hosted flows plus APIs for app-side authorization decisions. FusionAuth adds configurable sign-in and session behavior with extensible configuration when deeper control is required.
A SaaS app needs enterprise SSO from corporate IdPs. Which replacement fits that workflow better than a membership-only gate?
WorkOS fits better when the primary requirement is enterprise SSO and directory connections that drive app access decisions. MemberPress, MemberMouse, and Restrict Content Pro focus on WordPress membership gating tied to site subscriptions rather than IdP-first enterprise login patterns.
How should migration teams handle existing annotations, signatures, or form workflows tied to AuthPro session validation?
Stytch is often the migration path when sign-in and session checks must map cleanly onto existing app code paths, because its API-centric model supports direct replacement of session validation calls. Clerk and Auth0 can also fit, but migration work typically shifts toward SDK and middleware integration for route protection and session lifecycle handling. Memberful and Outseta reduce this work only when the app’s authorization logic can be re-framed around membership status rather than app-issued session validation.
What changes are required when AuthPro is used as a source of truth for authorization, but the replacement is WordPress membership gating?
MemberPress, MemberMouse, and Restrict Content Pro can replace AuthPro only when protected resources live in WordPress and access rules can be expressed as membership levels. If authorization currently happens inside a custom app backend using AuthPro-validated identity and session tokens, these WordPress-focused tools will leave gaps until the app authorization layer is redesigned.
Which tool best supports token-based access control across multiple app clients with audit visibility for auth events?
Auth0 is designed for application authentication and access control integration with user and authorization primitives, which aligns with multi-client token validation needs. FusionAuth also supports API-driven sign-in and session gating with configurable behavior, but teams selecting it typically plan for more configuration work. Stytch targets teams that want to own more of the flow wiring and session behavior via APIs.
An admin team needs RBAC and controlled access management for internal operations. Which alternative matches that admin focus?
Auth0 provides RBAC and policies tied to authentication outcomes so access rules can be administered around app identities. Clerk supports admin-side user management and operational settings that apps apply through its API. FusionAuth also offers configurable access control integrations, but organizations should expect more responsibility for tailoring the configuration to match existing operational models.
What integration approach works best when authentication must be driven by membership status without building custom sign-in UI?
Outseta fits scenarios where login journeys and access gating align with membership and subscriber management, so membership state can back route and page access. Memberful can gate member-only experiences based on hosted membership entitlements, but it does not act as an app authentication platform for session and token validation. Auth0 and Clerk can also gate access, but they centralize identity and session behavior rather than using membership state as the primary authorization source.
Which alternative is more suitable when the product requires custom passwordless or nonstandard sign-in flows?
Stytch is a strong fit because it provides authentication APIs that support configurable sign-in and session behavior inside the app. FusionAuth can also support configurable sign-in and session behavior, including deployment models that match infrastructure-heavy teams. Auth0 and Clerk support flexible identity flows too, but teams relying on Stytch typically aim to keep the sign-in UX and wiring inside product code.
When does staying with AuthPro make more sense than switching to a membership plugin like MemberPress?
AuthPro remains the better fit when authorization must run inside custom app backends using identity and session validation hooks, especially for non-WordPress protected actions. MemberPress can replace AuthPro only if the protected surface is primarily WordPress content, downloads, and page routes controlled by membership rules.

Tools featured as alternatives to AuthPro

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.