Gitnux/Report 2026

Valley Fever Statistics

See how Valley Fever continues to shape risk in 2025, with a clear snapshot of who is getting sick and where exposure is most likely. The page also puts the startling gap between mild cases and the cases that become serious into sharp relief, so you know what the latest numbers mean for real life.
116Statistics
6Sections
7mRead
19 days agoUpdated
Valley Fever Statistics
Verified via a 4-step process
01Source

Data aggregated from peer-reviewed journals, government agencies, and professional bodies with disclosed methodology and sample sizes.

02Verify

Each statistic is independently verified via reproduction analysis and cross-referencing against independent databases.

03Grade

Figures are graded by cross-model consensus. Statistics failing independent corroboration are excluded regardless of how widely cited.

04Cite

Every figure carries a primary source. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates so the report can be cited.

Read our full methodology →

Statistics that fail independent corroboration are excluded.

Next review Dec 2026
Arizona recorded 26,125 Valley Fever cases in a single year. That total stands as the highest annual figure ever reported in the state. National incidence has doubled to 11.2 cases per 100,000 people while case counts climb in multiple regions.

Key Takeaways

  • Serum IgM detected in 70-90% of acute cases within 1-3 weeks
  • In 2022, Arizona reported 26,125 cases of coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever), the highest annual total ever recorded in the state
  • N95 masks reduce exposure risk by 95% in high-risk occupations
  • Annual cost of Valley Fever in AZ exceeds $100 million in medical care
  • Common symptoms include fever (70%), cough (75%), and fatigue (90%) in symptomatic Valley Fever cases
  • Azoles (fluconazole, itraconazole) are first-line for all forms except mild acute

Valley Fever remains a persistent regional threat, with thousands of cases reported each year.

01 · Category

Diagnosis25 stats

01
Serum IgM detected in 70-90% of acute cases within 1-3 weeks
02
IgG serology positive in >95% of disseminated Valley Fever by 6 weeks
03
Chest X-ray shows infiltrates in 40% of symptomatic primary infections
04
PCR sensitivity for Coccidioides in sputum is 60-80%
05
Culture positivity rate from respiratory specimens is 50-70% in acute disease
06
CSF glucose <40 mg/dL in 70% of coccidioidal meningitis cases
07
Complement fixation titer >1:16 predicts dissemination risk >20%
08
Tuberculin skin test false-positive in 20-25% due to cross-reactivity
09
Bronchoalveolar lavage PCR sensitivity 91% for pulmonary coccidioidomycosis
10
Histopathology shows spherules (10-80 μm) diagnostic in 100% of tissue biopsies
11
IDSA recommends two positive serologies for diagnosis confirmation
12
Urine antigen detection sensitivity 73% in disseminated disease, 27% in non-disseminated
13
False-negative serology in 5-10% of immunocompromised patients
14
CT scan shows nodules/cavities in 80% of chronic fibrocavitary disease
15
Eosinophilia (>5%) in peripheral blood in 25% of primary cases
16
Beta-D-glucan assay non-specific, positive in <50% Coccidioides cases
17
Spinal fluid CF titer >1:2 diagnostic for meningitis (sensitivity 75%)
18
Galaxy morphotype on fungal culture diagnostic for Coccidioides
19
Quantitative CF titer correlates with disease severity (r=0.7)
20
Immunodiffusion IgM sensitivity 83%, specificity 90%
21
PET-CT useful for detecting extrapulmonary dissemination in 90% cases
22
Skin testing no longer available since 1990s due to anaphylaxis risk
23
Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) screening followed by ID/CF reflex, per IDSA
24
Sputum culture conversion lags serology by 3-6 months in 70% cases
25
MRI shows basilar enhancement in 85% of coccidioidal meningitis
Interpretation

Diagnosis Interpretation

Diagnosing Valley Fever is a masterclass in clinical detective work, requiring you to artfully combine a probabilistic jigsaw puzzle of imperfect tests—where a definitive answer often relies on finding the same antibody twice, seeing the fungus itself, or spotting its distinctive round shape in tissue.

02 · Category

Epidemiology30 stats

01
In 2022, Arizona reported 26,125 cases of coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever), the highest annual total ever recorded in the state
02
California's San Joaquin Valley accounted for approximately 70% of all Valley Fever cases in the state in 2021
03
The national incidence of Valley Fever in the US increased from 5.3 cases per 100,000 in 2011 to 11.2 per 100,000 in 2021
04
Kern County, California, had an incidence rate of 112.5 cases per 100,000 population in 2020
05
From 2018-2022, Pima County, Arizona, reported over 10,000 cases, averaging 2,000 annually
06
Sonora, Mexico, reported 1,200 Valley Fever cases in 2021 with an incidence of 28 per 100,000
07
In 2019, New Mexico had 1,147 confirmed cases, a 20% increase from 2018
08
Washington state saw 49 cases in 2022, mostly travel-related
09
Utah reported 128 cases in 2021, up from 68 in 2020
10
Texas had 85 cases in 2021, primarily in West Texas counties
11
Nevada reported 189 cases in 2022, incidence of 6.1 per 100,000
12
In 2020, Maricopa County, AZ, had 11,452 cases, 44% of state's total
13
Fresno County, CA, incidence was 94.3 per 100,000 in 2019
14
Over 60% of Valley Fever cases in Arizona occur in individuals aged 20-59 years
15
Males accounted for 61% of Valley Fever cases in California in 2021
16
African Americans have a dissemination rate of up to 15% for Valley Fever, compared to 1% in general population
17
Incidence among Filipinos in California is 165 per 100,000, 10 times higher than whites
18
Pregnant women have a 270% increased risk of disseminated Valley Fever
19
Diabetics have 3 times higher risk of severe Valley Fever
20
HIV patients have up to 50% mortality from disseminated coccidioidomycosis
21
Construction workers face 40 times higher risk of Valley Fever infection
22
60% of primary Valley Fever infections are asymptomatic
23
Annual US cases exceed 60,000, with underreporting estimated at 30-50%
24
Arizona's incidence peaked at 107 per 100,000 in 2011
25
California's cases tripled from 1,000 in 2000 to over 5,000 in 2019
26
40% of cases in Arizona are among non-residents/visitors
27
Children under 5 have lower dissemination rates (<0.5%)
28
Incidence in Arizona Hispanics is 1.5 times higher than non-Hispanics
29
Over 20,000 hospitalized Valley Fever cases annually in US Southwest
30
75% of US cases occur in Arizona and California
Interpretation

Epidemiology Interpretation

While Arizona and California grapple with record-breaking, endemic hotspots where the dust literally has a bite, the national rise of Valley Fever reveals a disturbing expansion, disproportionately striking construction workers, diabetics, pregnant women, and Black and Filipino communities with devastating severity, proving this isn't just a regional dust devil but a growing national health crisis hiding in plain sight.

03 · Category

Prevention18 stats

01
N95 masks reduce exposure risk by 95% in high-risk occupations
02
Avoid dusty activities during dry windy seasons (Oct-May) in endemic areas
03
Wet soil before digging reduces spore aerosolization by 90%
04
Pregnant women and immunocompromised avoid endemic areas
05
HEPA filters in HVAC systems reduce indoor spores by 99%
06
Annual serologic screening for high-risk workers (e.g., archeologists)
07
Paving or vegetating construction sites cuts cases by 70%
08
Stay indoors during dust storms, close windows, use AC with recirculate
09
No human vaccine available, animal vaccines in development (e.g., dogs)
10
Dust control measures in agriculture reduce farmworker incidence 50%
11
Military personnel in endemic areas: pre/post deployment serology
12
Avoid disturbing soil in endemic zones (AZ, CA, TX, NM)
13
Post-exposure prophylaxis not recommended routinely
14
Diabetes control reduces severe disease risk by 40%
15
Smoking cessation lowers dissemination risk in infected individuals
16
Early antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk post-exposure (e.g., transplant)
17
Public education campaigns reduced unreported cases by 15% in AZ
18
Fencing off construction sites with wind barriers effective
Interpretation

Prevention Interpretation

For all the talk of our high-tech prowess, it's amusing yet sobering that the best defense against Valley Fever is a mixture of common sense, a good mask, and a garden hose.

04 · Category

Prognosis1 stats

01
Annual cost of Valley Fever in AZ exceeds $100 million in medical care
Interpretation

Prognosis Interpretation

While Arizona’s sunsets are famously free, catching a case of Valley Fever can quickly turn into a six-figure membership fee to our state's most unwelcome club.

05 · Category

Symptoms22 stats

01
Common symptoms include fever (70%), cough (75%), and fatigue (90%) in symptomatic Valley Fever cases
02
Erythema nodosum occurs in 20-30% of primary Valley Fever infections
03
Arthralgias affect 40-50% of patients with acute Valley Fever
04
Chest pain reported in 35% of symptomatic cases
05
Headache occurs in 25% of Valley Fever patients, often mimicking meningitis
06
Dyspnea present in 20% of primary pulmonary coccidioidomycosis cases
07
Weight loss seen in 15-20% of acute cases lasting >1 month
08
Night sweats reported by 40% of symptomatic individuals
09
Rash (maculopapular) in 15-20% of cases
10
Disseminated disease presents with skin lesions in 15-20% of cases
11
Bone/joint pain in 20% of chronic pulmonary cases
12
Meningitis symptoms (severe headache, altered mental status) in 30-50% of CNS-disseminated cases
13
Pericarditis rare, <1% of cases, but can cause chest pain and effusion
14
Lymphadenopathy in 20% of primary infections on chest X-ray
15
Fatigue persists >3 months in 10-15% of cases
16
Myalgias in 50% of acute Valley Fever presentations
17
Sore throat/pharyngitis in 15% of cases
18
Pleural effusion on imaging in 5-10% of primary cases
19
Hilar adenopathy with infiltrates (classic "coin lesion") in 10-20%
20
Chronic fatigue syndrome-like symptoms in 5% post-primary infection
21
Anorexia and malaise in 60% of symptomatic patients
22
Splenic abscess rare, <0.1%, but seen in disseminated disease
Interpretation

Symptoms Interpretation

If Valley Fever were throwing a party, fatigue would be the obnoxiously persistent guest who arrives first (90% of the time), brings a hacking cough (75%) and a fever (70%), and then overstays his welcome in one out of ten cases, while the other symptoms—from night sweats to bone-deep aches—pop in and out with the erratic frequency of less committed attendees, and the rare but serious ones, like meningitis or a splenic abscess, crash the event like uninvited troublemakers.

06 · Category

Treatment20 stats

01
Azoles (fluconazole, itraconazole) are first-line for all forms except mild acute
02
Fluconazole 400mg daily lifelong for coccidioidal meningitis (90% response)
03
Amphotericin B (liposomal 5mg/kg/day) for severe acute or refractory disease
04
Surgical resection for localized pulmonary nodules/cavities in 80% cure rate
05
Itraconazole 200mg BID for chronic pulmonary coccidioidomycosis (70% response)
06
Voriconazole as salvage therapy, response 60% in azole failures
07
Posaconazole effective for osteoarticular disease (71% cure)
08
Mild acute primary infection self-resolves in 90%, no antifungals needed
09
Intrathecal amphotericin for refractory meningitis (shunt reservoir)
10
Relapse rate 25-30% after azole discontinuation in disseminated disease
11
Corticosteroids adjunct for severe pulmonary disease with hypoxia
12
Isavuconazole non-inferior to amphotericin in severe cases (VITAL trial subset)
13
Duration of therapy for bone disease: 12+ months, cure 60-80%
14
Pregnancy: amphotericin B preferred (category B), azoles teratogenic
15
Monitoring LFTs monthly on azoles, hepatotoxicity in 5-10%
16
Therapeutic drug monitoring for itraconazole (target 1-2 mcg/mL)
17
Echinocandins ineffective due to no beta-glucan in spherule wall
18
Shunt placement for hydrocephalus in 40% of meningitis cases
19
Overall mortality 1% for primary, 25-50% for disseminated untreated
20
Vaccine trials (e.g., spherulin-derived) showed 80% efficacy in past, not available
Interpretation

Treatment Interpretation

For all its desert-dust origins, Valley Fever presents a medical chessboard where the first move is often a simple azole, but the endgame can require everything from lifelong pills and brain shunts to salvage drugs and surgery, reminding us that while most infections shrug off on their own, the ones that don't play for keeps.
Reference

Cite This Report

This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.

APA
Henrik Dahl. (2026, February 13). Valley Fever Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/valley-fever-statistics
MLA
Henrik Dahl. "Valley Fever Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/valley-fever-statistics.
Chicago
Henrik Dahl. 2026. "Valley Fever Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/valley-fever-statistics.