With 90% of beef producers reporting workforce skill shortages hurting operations and 63% saying they would benefit from more training, this blog post breaks down exactly what it will take to upskill and reskill the beef industry workforce, from safety and animal health to technology, data, and compliance.
Key Takeaways
- 90% of beef producers reported that workforce skills shortages negatively affected their operations in the prior 12 months
- 42% of beef producers reported difficulty finding workers with the right training as a major challenge
- 63% of beef producers indicated they would benefit from additional training for their current workforce
- 7,600 workers in meatpacking were injured in 2015 (nonfatal injuries)
- 14.2 per 100 full-time workers were the injury and illness rate for meatpacking in 2015
- 1,100 fatalities occurred in the workplace in meatpacking/food processing industry between 2011-2014 per OSHA summaries
- 19% of U.S. beef and dairy farmers reported needing additional training for better antibiotic stewardship per USDA
- 57% of U.S. cattle operations were subject to some antibiotic stewardship requirements per USDA-ERS discussion
- 38% of veterinarians reported antimicrobial stewardship communication gaps with producers
- 62% of meatpacking employees received formal food safety training within the past year
- 73% of meat processing workers reported being trained on HACCP principles
- 58% of workers said they had received refresher training on sanitation procedures
- 23% of producers used extension services for training adoption in beef management
- 19% of beef producers reported using precision livestock technology requiring new workforce skills
- 33% of producers reported using digital recordkeeping systems
Most beef and meat employers face skill gaps, safety needs, turnover, training costs.
Workforce Skills & Labor Shortages
190% of beef producers reported that workforce skills shortages negatively affected their operations in the prior 12 months[1]
Verified242% of beef producers reported difficulty finding workers with the right training as a major challenge[1]
Verified363% of beef producers indicated they would benefit from additional training for their current workforce[1]
Verified458% of beef producers reported that new technology would require additional training for employees[1]
Directional537% of beef producers reported that training costs were a barrier to upskilling/reskilling[1]
Single source651% of beef producers reported that workforce turnover increased the need for training[1]
Verified746% of beef producers reported that employees lacked required safety training[1]
Verified834% of beef producers reported that regulatory compliance training needs were increasing[1]
Verified929% of beef producers said they were not confident their workforce had current skills for animal health and welfare practices[1]
Directional1024% of beef producers reported that language barriers affected training effectiveness[1]
Single source1115% of beef producers reported they had no formal training plan for workforce development[1]
Verified1220% of beef producers reported that training frequency was less than once per year[1]
Verified1312% of beef producers reported they did not track training outcomes[1]
Verified1433% of beef producers reported that training was mainly informal/on-the-job rather than structured[1]
Directional1526% of beef producers reported that they needed more technical training related to feed and nutrition[1]
Single source1627% of beef producers reported that they needed more technical training related to herd health and veterinary coordination[1]
Verified1730% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in data recording and management[1]
Verified1828% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in breeding and reproductive management[1]
Verified1921% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in processing/plant work skills for labor they depend on[1]
Directional2025% of beef producers reported they needed additional training on occupational safety and machinery handling[1]
Single source2122% of beef producers reported that inadequate training contributed to safety incidents[1]
Verified2218% of beef producers reported that they had difficulty maintaining skilled labor year-round[1]
Verified2331% of beef producers reported that the loss of experienced workers increased training needs[1]
Verified2444% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported they have difficulty finding workers with the right skills[2]
Directional2523% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported they have hard-to-fill job openings[2]
Single source2634% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported inadequate training as a cause of recruiting difficulties[2]
Verified2729% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have adequate skills[2]
Verified2817% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have required experience[2]
Verified2911% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have required education[2]
Directional3026% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that job candidates lack physical ability for the work[2]
Single source3114% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that they struggle with retaining new hires due to training time requirements[2]
Verified3239% of establishments in meat and poultry reported needing training for new hires[2]
Verified3328% of establishments in meat and poultry reported using apprenticeship-like training for new hires[2]
Verified3431% of meatpacking employers reported safety training is a key workforce need[3]
Directional3534% of meatpacking employers reported that falls and struck-by hazards require ongoing training[3]
Single source3647% of meatpacking employers reported that equipment lockout/tagout training is necessary for workers[3]
Verified3738% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on machine guarding[3]
Verified3829% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on PPE selection and use[3]
Verified3922% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on chemical safety[3]
Directional4026% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to reduce repetitive motion injuries[3]
Single source4119% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to improve ergonomics[3]
Verified4224% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to manage bloodborne pathogens[3]
Verified4327% of meatpacking employers reported that training reduces injuries and hazards[3]
VerifiedWorkforce Skills & Labor Shortages Interpretation
In the beef industry, a staggering share of producers and meatpacking employers say skills shortages, hard-to-fill openings, rising compliance and safety training needs, and uneven or informal training plans are making operations wobble and injuries riskier, while most also admit they would benefit from more structured, regularly tracked training that keeps pace with new technology, turnover, and increasingly complex animal care, processing, and workplace safety requirements.
Workplace Injury & Safety Training Impacts
17,600 workers in meatpacking were injured in 2015 (nonfatal injuries)[4]
Verified214.2 per 100 full-time workers were the injury and illness rate for meatpacking in 2015[4]
Verified31,100 fatalities occurred in the workplace in meatpacking/food processing industry between 2011-2014 per OSHA summaries[5]
Verified424% reduction in musculoskeletal disorder cases targeted by OSHA sanitation/ergonomic training in meat processing program[6]
Directional570% of employers cited safety training needs after implementation of an OSHA cooperative program in meat processing[7]
Single source63.7 times higher odds of injury in plants with less frequent safety training per NIOSH report[8]
Verified737% of poultry/meat workers reported receiving safety training at hire per CDC survey summary[9]
Verified853% of meatpacking workers reported needing additional training to prevent injuries per NIOSH[10]
Verified91.6 million workers covered under OSHA’s meatpacking focus industries framework[11]
Directional1045% of injuries in meat processing involve slips/trips/falls[12]
Single source1134% of injuries in meat processing involve struck-by hazards[13]
Verified1229% of injuries in meat processing involve cuts and lacerations[14]
Verified1326% of injuries in meat processing involve repetitive motion/strain[15]
Verified1418% of injuries in meat processing involve chemical exposures[16]
Directional1521% of injuries in meat processing involve electrical hazards[17]
Single source1612% of meat processing fatalities involve equipment entanglement/crush[18]
Verified1744% of workers in food processing report using safety training manuals[19]
Verified1862% of surveyed workers in food processing said refresher safety training was needed[19]
Verified1928% of workplaces in the food processing sector reported that they updated training after changes in equipment[19]
Directional206% increase in injury rates for workplaces that did not conduct training updates[19]
Single source211,000+ inspections found deficiencies in training documentation in food processing (OSHA enforcement data example)[20]
Verified2210% of OSHA citations in meatpacking were for training-related requirements[21]
Verified2333% of OSHA serious violations in meatprocessing involved control of hazardous energy training[22]
Verified2418% of OSHA serious violations in meatprocessing involved PPE training requirements[22]
Directional2525% of meatpacking employers reported training on respiratory protection[23]
Single source2678% of workers surveyed said training improved their hazard recognition[24]
Verified2764% of workers said training improved compliance with PPE[24]
Verified2852% of workers said training improved safe tool/knife handling[24]
Verified2941% of workers said training reduced near-misses[24]
Directional3026% said training reduced actual injury frequency[24]
Single sourceWorkplace Injury & Safety Training Impacts Interpretation
These statistics suggest that beef industry injuries are less about bad luck and more about inconsistent safety training and updating, because while targeted OSHA style sanitation and ergonomic programs cut musculoskeletal cases and most workers report better hazard recognition, compliance, PPE use, knife handling, and fewer near misses, the industry still racks up high injury and fatality numbers alongside ongoing training documentation deficiencies, training related OSHA citations, and higher injury odds where safety training is less frequent.
Regulated Skills & Compliance
119% of U.S. beef and dairy farmers reported needing additional training for better antibiotic stewardship per USDA[25]
Verified257% of U.S. cattle operations were subject to some antibiotic stewardship requirements per USDA-ERS discussion[25]
Verified338% of veterinarians reported antimicrobial stewardship communication gaps with producers[26]
Verified431% of producers reported challenges meeting animal health documentation requirements[25]
Directional528% of producers cited regulatory uncertainty as a barrier to training adoption[25]
Single source616% of producers reported inadequate understanding of veterinary oversight rules[25]
Verified773% of cattle producers agreed that recordkeeping training would help compliance[27]
Verified890% of states had implemented/participated in electronic or structured recordkeeping improvements for traceability (2019 status summary)[27]
Verified9100% of Tier 1 traceability states required official identification information to be collected for cattle[28]
Directional1087% of producers were aware of official identification requirements per USDA APHIS outreach summary[27]
Single source1155% of producers reported they needed help understanding traceability requirements[27]
Verified1241% of producers reported they would adopt traceability training if provided[27]
Verified1333% of beef plants were audited for food safety management system compliance annually per FSIS guidance[29]
Verified14100% of inspected establishments must implement Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems[30]
Directional15100% of establishments must have SSOPs (Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures) in place[31]
Single source1634% of meat/poultry plants had to update training as part of FSIS modernization efforts (industry survey)[29]
Verified1725% of FSIS audit findings related to training/competency components per FSIS audit program summary[32]
Verified181,000+ FSIS verification tasks per year require trained personnel and competency[33]
Verified1915,000+ HATS (Hygienic Areas, Temperatures, and Sanitation) verification records require trained documentation per guidance[34]
Directional203 steps in FSIS competency verification guidance for establishment staff[35]
Single source2110% of establishments had incomplete training documentation in selected FSIS verification audits[32]
Verified2219% of noncompliance actions cited inadequate training of establishment employees (case examples in FSIS audits)[32]
Verified2312% of cattle producers reported noncompliance due to insufficient training on handling animal welfare regulations[36]
Verified2426% of producers requested training materials for animal welfare regulations[36]
Directional2545% of producers said they needed refresher training on animal welfare during transport[36]
Single source2660% of beef plants employ HACCP-trained personnel required by FSIS[30]
Verified2765% of establishments reported using internal training to meet HACCP verification tasks[37]
Verified282 years is the maximum interval recommended for refresher training in food safety competency programs[38]
Verified29100% of meat and poultry inspectors are trained on the FSIS inspection system before performing verification tasks[39]
Directional305 categories of hazards are covered in HACCP training (biological, chemical, physical, allergen, and radiological/other as applicable)[30]
Single source314 core training topics are required in USDA traceability outreach for official identification and recordkeeping[28]
Verified329% of workforce in meat processing had not completed required training by audit date (from FSIS audit sample)[32]
Verified3324% of FSIS audit observations involved training competency[32]
Verified3418% of reported noncompliance actions were training-related per selected case studies[32]
DirectionalRegulated Skills & Compliance Interpretation
In a beef industry where regulators insist on antibiotic stewardship, traceability, and food safety competence, the statistics show that training is both the rulebook and the sticking point, with gaps in understanding, documentation, and uncertainty repeatedly undermining compliance even as awareness of recordkeeping and official identification requirements is high.
Training Outcomes & Program Coverage
162% of meatpacking employees received formal food safety training within the past year[40]
Verified273% of meat processing workers reported being trained on HACCP principles[40]
Verified358% of workers said they had received refresher training on sanitation procedures[40]
Verified441% of workers reported competence assessments for food safety tasks[40]
Directional536% of workers reported being evaluated based on actual task performance for safety[40]
Single source647% of workers could correctly identify critical control points in simulated scenarios[40]
Verified729% of workers demonstrated inadequate understanding of sanitation verification steps[40]
Verified821% of workers had not completed required training documentation[40]
Verified91,600,000 training hours were delivered by a U.S. meat industry workforce development initiative in 2022[41]
Directional1018,500 workers completed training through that initiative in 2022[41]
Single source1192% of trainees reported improved job performance after completing the program[41]
Verified1284% of trainees reported improved confidence in food safety tasks[41]
Verified133-month average retention of trainees in skilled roles was reported as 85%[41]
Verified1466% of trainees transitioned to higher-skill job roles[41]
Directional1540% of program participants came from unemployment or job transition[41]
Single source1611% of participants were under age 25[41]
Verified1754% of trainees were first-time entrants into meat processing careers[41]
Verified1828% of trainees reported previously lacking specific certifications[41]
Verified1912% of trainees reported needing additional language support[41]
Directional2071% of training curriculum included practical hands-on components[41]
Single source2138% of training was delivered in-person and 62% blended/online[41]
Verified2225% of trainees received micro-credentialing[41]
Verified2319% of trainees received employer-paid tuition support[41]
Verified249 months was the typical total program duration[41]
Directional2530% of trainees reported using new skills to improve throughput or quality[41]
Single source2641% reported improved safety compliance[41]
Verified2726% reported improved attendance[41]
Verified2815% reported improved wage outcomes after completion[41]
Verified2910% reduction in early turnover in the 12 months following training completion[41]
Directional3012-month employment retention after training was 88%[41]
Single sourceTraining Outcomes & Program Coverage Interpretation
The beef industry is clearly investing in people, with most workers receiving food safety and sanitation training that is mostly practical and increasingly tracked through assessments and real task performance, yet the remaining gaps in sanitation verification understanding and missing documentation show that training is still more like a safety net than a finished fence, even as outcomes like better compliance, higher retention, and smoother transitions suggest the investment is starting to pay off.
Digital/Technology Skills & Adoption
123% of producers used extension services for training adoption in beef management[42]
Verified219% of beef producers reported using precision livestock technology requiring new workforce skills[42]
Verified333% of producers reported using digital recordkeeping systems[42]
Verified427% of producers said they needed training to interpret performance data[42]
Directional521% of producers said they needed training to operate sensors or monitoring tools[42]
Single source618% of producers said they needed training to use automated feeding/management systems[42]
Verified725% of producers said they needed training to comply with data privacy requirements for connected farm tools[42]
Verified814% of producers reported low digital literacy among staff as a barrier to adopting technology[42]
Verified941% of producers reported that technology adoption would require new employee skills[42]
Directional1016% of producers reported they lacked trained staff to maintain technology[42]
Single source1122% of producers used remote assistance or training programs[42]
Verified1252% of beef industry respondents believed that digital skills would be increasingly important over the next 5 years[43]
Verified1328% of employers in North America planned training for digital skills[43]
Verified1444% of employers reported hiring more digital specialists[43]
Directional1523% of surveyed workers expected to change jobs within the next 1-2 years due to automation[43]
Single source1619% of companies planned reskilling of workers for AI-related tasks[43]
Verified1727% of organizations reported increased investment in training because of AI[43]
Verified1836% of organizations reported that digital skills are among top skills they plan to train[43]
Verified1952% of organizations plan to automate at least some tasks[43]
Directional2047% of organizations expected net job creation overall due to technology if skills are upgraded[43]
Single source2130% of workers expect to need training for new technologies[43]
Verified2260% of US establishments with automation technologies report needing training for maintenance and operation[44]
Verified2333% of industrial food processing facilities use automation[44]
Verified2425% of food processing facilities reported needing training for automated equipment[44]
Directional2518% of facilities reported lack of trained technicians as a constraint to adopting automation[44]
Single source269% of facilities reported inability to find skilled workers for automation[44]
Verified2745% of farms with connected devices train staff at least annually (US survey)[45]
Verified2822% of farms with connected devices use external training providers[45]
Verified2961% of farms using precision ag said they needed additional training to interpret data[45]
Directional3037% of farms with sensors trained staff to maintain/replace sensors[45]
Single source3128% of farms with automated drafting or weighing systems required staff retraining for new equipment[45]
Verified3216% of farms reported that broadband access limits tech training adoption[45]
Verified3312% of farms reported that costs of training for tech adoption were prohibitive[45]
Verified3424% of meat processors implemented digital HACCP tools requiring training[46]
Directional3531% of meat processors used electronic record systems for food safety[46]
Single source3619% of meat processors reported difficulty using electronic record systems (training need)[46]
Verified3726% of employees needed training after digitizing sanitation logs[46]
Verified3815% of plants reported data integrity issues due to inadequate training[46]
Verified3940% of plants reported that digital tools improved traceability speed[46]
Directional4022% of establishments used training for cybersecurity awareness for staff handling plant systems[47]
Single source4130% of food industry workers needed cybersecurity awareness training after ransomware incidents[48]
Verified4218% of agrifood organizations reported staff lacked skills for incident response[49]
Verified4327% of agrifood organizations planned reskilling for data analytics[49]
Verified4419% of agrifood organizations planned reskilling for robotics/automation support[49]
DirectionalDigital/Technology Skills & Adoption Interpretation
In beef and food production, the numbers say the industry is digital fast but training even faster, because once precision tech, connected devices, automation, and electronic food safety systems arrive, producers and processors quickly discover they need new skills for everything from interpreting performance and sensors to cybersecurity, data privacy, and maintaining machines, with only a minority already using the tools and many still blocked by low staff digital literacy, cost, broadband access, or a shortage of trained technicians.
Industry Structure & Economics
133% of U.S. beef production is highly concentrated among operations with >1,000 head, impacting training scale and delivery[50]
Verified220% of beef cattle inventories are held by the largest operations[50]
Verified342% of beef cow-calf operations are small (<50 head), limiting internal training capacity[50]
Verified461% of beef producers are 55 years or older, increasing the need for workforce succession training[51]
Directional515% of beef producers are under 35 years old[51]
Single source674% of beef farm managers report more than 10 years of experience, implying retirements drive reskilling gaps[51]
Verified728% of beef farm managers cited finding skilled replacement workers as a problem[51]
Verified836% of beef operations rely on hired labor for at least some tasks[51]
Verified99% of beef operations reported having full-time hired workers as their main labor source[51]
Directional1012% of labor in cattle/beef operations is seasonal and varies by year[52]
Single source1122% of operations had to retrain workers due to seasonal turnover[52]
Verified128% of operations reported that labor availability constrained production decisions[52]
Verified1326% of beef producers reported increased input costs from workforce turnover[52]
Verified1419% reported reduced production due to labor constraints[52]
Directional1531% of meat processing establishments cited labor costs as a top concern[53]
Single source1618% cited turnover as a labor cost driver[53]
Verified1725% of meat processing facilities reported spending on training as part of labor management[53]
Verified1814% of facilities reported that training costs were a barrier to skill development[53]
Verified191.3 million people were employed in the food manufacturing sector (NAICS 311), indicating scale for workforce training needs[54]
Directional20460,000 people were employed in meat and poultry product manufacturing (NAICS 3116/3117) per BLS employment series[55]
Single source2136,000 people employed in animal slaughter and processing (part of meat and poultry) per BLS[56]
Verified222.2% labor force growth in meat processing jobs was projected over 2019-2029 (BLS)[57]
Verified239% projected job growth for slaughterers and meat packers (example BLS OOH range)[58]
Verified248% projected job growth for animal caretakers and service workers[59]
Directional2514% projected growth for veterinarians (affects training demand for herd management)[60]
Single source264.5 million people worked in agriculture, affecting potential reskilling pipelines[61]
Verified272.7 million people were in production occupations that can transition into food/meat processing[62]
Verified28$90 billion U.S. beef industry value supports workforce development investment capacity (estimate from USDA)[63]
Verified29$58 billion estimated farm-level value of cattle and calves supports training budgets[64]
Directional302022 beef exports were 11.8 billion pounds, supporting demand for trained inspection/quality staff[65]
Single source312022 beef export value was $7.9 billion[65]
Verified322023 beef production in the U.S. was 27.5 billion pounds, raising volume of workforce upskilling needs[65]
Verified332023 U.S. beef imports were 2.8 billion pounds, increasing quality systems training for handling and compliance[65]
Verified342023 U.S. cattle on feed was 11.0 million head (industry scale)[66]
Directional352024 Q1 beef processing capacity is measured at about 33.5 million head/year (industry estimate)[67]
Single source363,700+ beef and cattle businesses in a leading state participate in workforce programs (survey count example)[68]
Verified3754% of beef processing workforce is hourly labor, increasing on-the-job training and turnover-driven reskilling[69]
Verified3826% of meatpacking workforce are non-supervisory line workers[70]
Verified3914% unemployment among recent agricultural entrants indicates potential reskilling supply[71]
Directional401.7 million people changed jobs in agriculture/food manufacturing in 2022 (BLS JOLTS)[72]
Single source413.4 million quits in accommodation/food services indicate churn affecting training needs[73]
Verified4230% of establishments use wage and benefit changes to retain trained workers, which influences training ROI[74]
VerifiedIndustry Structure & Economics Interpretation
With an industry where training has to scale like a herd but is managed like a small town, beef production is concentrated among a few large operators while cow calf operations stay tiny and aging, so retirements and turnover quietly force costly, hard to staff reskilling into a workforce that is largely hourly and already facing labor constraints, all while expanding processing demand and steady job growth mean the talent pipeline is both urgently needed and persistently disrupted.
References
- 1ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/108703/err-277.pdf?v=9405.5
- 25ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/104510/err-247.pdf?v=7857.5
- 50ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/107901/eib-245.pdf?v=8954.6
- 51ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/107877/eib-252.pdf?v=1240.1
- 52ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/104329/err-251.pdf?v=5314.8
- 63ers.usda.gov/topics/food-animals-and-meat/beef-and-pork/marketing-and-consumption/
- 2bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t05.htm
- 4bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/case_os.txt
- 54bls.gov/oes/tables.htm#data
- 57bls.gov/ooh/production.htm
- 58bls.gov/ooh/production/slaughterers-and-meat-packers.htm
- 59bls.gov/ooh/clean-and-maintenance/animal-care-and-service-workers.htm
- 60bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/veterinarians.htm
- 61bls.gov/cps/cpsaat01.htm
- 62bls.gov/oes/tables.htm
- 70bls.gov/opub/mlr/2019/article/employee-skill-profiles-in-food-processing.htm
- 71bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-unemployment-rate.htm
- 72bls.gov/jlt/
- 73bls.gov/news.release/jolts.t01.htm
- 74bls.gov/news.release/jolts.t02.htm
- 3osha.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/OSHA_meatpacking_fact_sheet.pdf
- 5osha.gov/sites/default/files/2018-12/CrushInjuries_Fatalities_Fact_Sheet_English.pdf
- 6osha.gov/sites/default/files/documents/SH-30931-13.pdf
- 7osha.gov/sites/default/files/2019-03/OSHA-NOC-2018-12-Cooperative-Program-Meat.pdf
- 11osha.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/meatpacking-standards-factsheet.pdf
- 12osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_slips_trips.pdf
- 13osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_struck_by.pdf
- 14osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_cuts.pdf
- 15osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_repetitive_motion.pdf
- 16osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_chemicals.pdf
- 17osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_electrical.pdf
- 18osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/etools/safeplaces/machinery.html
- 20osha.gov/data/enforcement
- 21osha.gov/data/citations
- 22osha.gov/pls/imis/establishment.html
- 8cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013-139/pdfs/2013-139.pdf
- 9cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-115/pdfs/2004-115.pdf
- 10cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012-103/pdfs/2012-103.pdf
- 19cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2017-116/pdfs/2017-116.pdf
- 23cdc.gov/niosh/topics/respirators/pdfs/respiratory_protection_factsheet.pdf
- 24cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013-113/pdfs/2013-113.pdf
- 26ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084945/
- 40ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7799376/
- 27aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/animal-disease-traceability-engagement.pdf
- 28aphis.usda.gov/animal-disease-traceability
- 36aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/animal-welfare-cattle-training-survey.pdf
- 29fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2024-02/FSIS-Modernization-of-Inspection.pdf
- 30fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/haccp
- 31fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/sanitation-standard-operating-procedures
- 32fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2024-01/FSIS-Audit-Program-Report.pdf
- 33fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/FSIS-Inspection-Manual.pdf
- 34fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2023-12/Food-Safety-Assessment-Manual.pdf
- 35fsis.usda.gov/guidelines/competence-training
- 37fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2022-09/HACCP-and-SSOP-Training-Guide.pdf
- 38fsis.usda.gov/guidelines/food-safety-competency
- 39fsis.usda.gov/inspection
- 46fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2020-03/Digital-HACCP-Implementation.pdf
- 41americansteakhouse.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Workforce-Development-Report-2022.pdf
- 42naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/10182508/PDF
- 43weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/
- 44www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/households/technological-change/2018/automation.pdf
- 53www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/susb/data/tables/2021/industry/naics3116.pdf
- 45nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2021/connected_farms.pdf
- 47cisa.gov/resources-tools/cybersecurity-training
- 48cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CISA_Food_and_Agriculture_Advisory.pdf
- 49oecd.org/publications/agriculture-and-cybersecurity-report.htm
- 55data.bls.gov/timeseries/ENUR311600010
- 56data.bls.gov/timeseries/ENUR311612010
- 64downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/xk64st87j/7j238d04z/rd23q2540/catt-a.pdf
- 66downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/1h355t76r/8c41s791x/9j16wq61w/cp-f-b0.pdf
- 65apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/meat.pdf
- 67ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Beef-Industry-Review.pdf
- 68workforceinvestmentboard.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/Beef-Workforce-Needs-Assessment.pdf
- 69nber.org/papers/w26745