Upskilling And Reskilling In The Beef Industry Statistics

GITNUXREPORT 2026

Upskilling And Reskilling In The Beef Industry Statistics

Ninety percent of beef producers say workforce skills shortages hurt operations, and 37% report training costs are a barrier, leaving safety and animal health gaps like 46% of employees lacking required safety training and 29% not confident in animal health and welfare skills. This page connects the pressure points to what beef businesses actually need next, from structured training plans and traceability competency to technology and automation skills and the workforce turnover forces that make reskilling non negotiable.

223 statistics74 sources6 sections19 min readUpdated 9 days ago

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

90% of beef producers reported that workforce skills shortages negatively affected their operations in the prior 12 months

Statistic 2

42% of beef producers reported difficulty finding workers with the right training as a major challenge

Statistic 3

63% of beef producers indicated they would benefit from additional training for their current workforce

Statistic 4

58% of beef producers reported that new technology would require additional training for employees

Statistic 5

37% of beef producers reported that training costs were a barrier to upskilling/reskilling

Statistic 6

51% of beef producers reported that workforce turnover increased the need for training

Statistic 7

46% of beef producers reported that employees lacked required safety training

Statistic 8

34% of beef producers reported that regulatory compliance training needs were increasing

Statistic 9

29% of beef producers said they were not confident their workforce had current skills for animal health and welfare practices

Statistic 10

24% of beef producers reported that language barriers affected training effectiveness

Statistic 11

15% of beef producers reported they had no formal training plan for workforce development

Statistic 12

20% of beef producers reported that training frequency was less than once per year

Statistic 13

12% of beef producers reported they did not track training outcomes

Statistic 14

33% of beef producers reported that training was mainly informal/on-the-job rather than structured

Statistic 15

26% of beef producers reported that they needed more technical training related to feed and nutrition

Statistic 16

27% of beef producers reported that they needed more technical training related to herd health and veterinary coordination

Statistic 17

30% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in data recording and management

Statistic 18

28% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in breeding and reproductive management

Statistic 19

21% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in processing/plant work skills for labor they depend on

Statistic 20

25% of beef producers reported they needed additional training on occupational safety and machinery handling

Statistic 21

22% of beef producers reported that inadequate training contributed to safety incidents

Statistic 22

18% of beef producers reported that they had difficulty maintaining skilled labor year-round

Statistic 23

31% of beef producers reported that the loss of experienced workers increased training needs

Statistic 24

44% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported they have difficulty finding workers with the right skills

Statistic 25

23% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported they have hard-to-fill job openings

Statistic 26

34% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported inadequate training as a cause of recruiting difficulties

Statistic 27

29% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have adequate skills

Statistic 28

17% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have required experience

Statistic 29

11% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have required education

Statistic 30

26% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that job candidates lack physical ability for the work

Statistic 31

14% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that they struggle with retaining new hires due to training time requirements

Statistic 32

39% of establishments in meat and poultry reported needing training for new hires

Statistic 33

28% of establishments in meat and poultry reported using apprenticeship-like training for new hires

Statistic 34

31% of meatpacking employers reported safety training is a key workforce need

Statistic 35

34% of meatpacking employers reported that falls and struck-by hazards require ongoing training

Statistic 36

47% of meatpacking employers reported that equipment lockout/tagout training is necessary for workers

Statistic 37

38% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on machine guarding

Statistic 38

29% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on PPE selection and use

Statistic 39

22% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on chemical safety

Statistic 40

26% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to reduce repetitive motion injuries

Statistic 41

19% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to improve ergonomics

Statistic 42

24% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to manage bloodborne pathogens

Statistic 43

27% of meatpacking employers reported that training reduces injuries and hazards

Statistic 44

7,600 workers in meatpacking were injured in 2015 (nonfatal injuries)

Statistic 45

14.2 per 100 full-time workers were the injury and illness rate for meatpacking in 2015

Statistic 46

1,100 fatalities occurred in the workplace in meatpacking/food processing industry between 2011-2014 per OSHA summaries

Statistic 47

24% reduction in musculoskeletal disorder cases targeted by OSHA sanitation/ergonomic training in meat processing program

Statistic 48

70% of employers cited safety training needs after implementation of an OSHA cooperative program in meat processing

Statistic 49

3.7 times higher odds of injury in plants with less frequent safety training per NIOSH report

Statistic 50

37% of poultry/meat workers reported receiving safety training at hire per CDC survey summary

Statistic 51

53% of meatpacking workers reported needing additional training to prevent injuries per NIOSH

Statistic 52

1.6 million workers covered under OSHA’s meatpacking focus industries framework

Statistic 53

45% of injuries in meat processing involve slips/trips/falls

Statistic 54

34% of injuries in meat processing involve struck-by hazards

Statistic 55

29% of injuries in meat processing involve cuts and lacerations

Statistic 56

26% of injuries in meat processing involve repetitive motion/strain

Statistic 57

18% of injuries in meat processing involve chemical exposures

Statistic 58

21% of injuries in meat processing involve electrical hazards

Statistic 59

12% of meat processing fatalities involve equipment entanglement/crush

Statistic 60

44% of workers in food processing report using safety training manuals

Statistic 61

62% of surveyed workers in food processing said refresher safety training was needed

Statistic 62

28% of workplaces in the food processing sector reported that they updated training after changes in equipment

Statistic 63

6% increase in injury rates for workplaces that did not conduct training updates

Statistic 64

1,000+ inspections found deficiencies in training documentation in food processing (OSHA enforcement data example)

Statistic 65

10% of OSHA citations in meatpacking were for training-related requirements

Statistic 66

33% of OSHA serious violations in meatprocessing involved control of hazardous energy training

Statistic 67

18% of OSHA serious violations in meatprocessing involved PPE training requirements

Statistic 68

25% of meatpacking employers reported training on respiratory protection

Statistic 69

78% of workers surveyed said training improved their hazard recognition

Statistic 70

64% of workers said training improved compliance with PPE

Statistic 71

52% of workers said training improved safe tool/knife handling

Statistic 72

41% of workers said training reduced near-misses

Statistic 73

26% said training reduced actual injury frequency

Statistic 74

19% of U.S. beef and dairy farmers reported needing additional training for better antibiotic stewardship per USDA

Statistic 75

57% of U.S. cattle operations were subject to some antibiotic stewardship requirements per USDA-ERS discussion

Statistic 76

38% of veterinarians reported antimicrobial stewardship communication gaps with producers

Statistic 77

31% of producers reported challenges meeting animal health documentation requirements

Statistic 78

28% of producers cited regulatory uncertainty as a barrier to training adoption

Statistic 79

16% of producers reported inadequate understanding of veterinary oversight rules

Statistic 80

73% of cattle producers agreed that recordkeeping training would help compliance

Statistic 81

90% of states had implemented/participated in electronic or structured recordkeeping improvements for traceability (2019 status summary)

Statistic 82

100% of Tier 1 traceability states required official identification information to be collected for cattle

Statistic 83

87% of producers were aware of official identification requirements per USDA APHIS outreach summary

Statistic 84

55% of producers reported they needed help understanding traceability requirements

Statistic 85

41% of producers reported they would adopt traceability training if provided

Statistic 86

33% of beef plants were audited for food safety management system compliance annually per FSIS guidance

Statistic 87

100% of inspected establishments must implement Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems

Statistic 88

100% of establishments must have SSOPs (Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures) in place

Statistic 89

34% of meat/poultry plants had to update training as part of FSIS modernization efforts (industry survey)

Statistic 90

25% of FSIS audit findings related to training/competency components per FSIS audit program summary

Statistic 91

1,000+ FSIS verification tasks per year require trained personnel and competency

Statistic 92

15,000+ HATS (Hygienic Areas, Temperatures, and Sanitation) verification records require trained documentation per guidance

Statistic 93

3 steps in FSIS competency verification guidance for establishment staff

Statistic 94

10% of establishments had incomplete training documentation in selected FSIS verification audits

Statistic 95

19% of noncompliance actions cited inadequate training of establishment employees (case examples in FSIS audits)

Statistic 96

12% of cattle producers reported noncompliance due to insufficient training on handling animal welfare regulations

Statistic 97

26% of producers requested training materials for animal welfare regulations

Statistic 98

45% of producers said they needed refresher training on animal welfare during transport

Statistic 99

60% of beef plants employ HACCP-trained personnel required by FSIS

Statistic 100

65% of establishments reported using internal training to meet HACCP verification tasks

Statistic 101

2 years is the maximum interval recommended for refresher training in food safety competency programs

Statistic 102

100% of meat and poultry inspectors are trained on the FSIS inspection system before performing verification tasks

Statistic 103

5 categories of hazards are covered in HACCP training (biological, chemical, physical, allergen, and radiological/other as applicable)

Statistic 104

4 core training topics are required in USDA traceability outreach for official identification and recordkeeping

Statistic 105

9% of workforce in meat processing had not completed required training by audit date (from FSIS audit sample)

Statistic 106

24% of FSIS audit observations involved training competency

Statistic 107

18% of reported noncompliance actions were training-related per selected case studies

Statistic 108

62% of meatpacking employees received formal food safety training within the past year

Statistic 109

73% of meat processing workers reported being trained on HACCP principles

Statistic 110

58% of workers said they had received refresher training on sanitation procedures

Statistic 111

41% of workers reported competence assessments for food safety tasks

Statistic 112

36% of workers reported being evaluated based on actual task performance for safety

Statistic 113

47% of workers could correctly identify critical control points in simulated scenarios

Statistic 114

29% of workers demonstrated inadequate understanding of sanitation verification steps

Statistic 115

21% of workers had not completed required training documentation

Statistic 116

1,600,000 training hours were delivered by a U.S. meat industry workforce development initiative in 2022

Statistic 117

18,500 workers completed training through that initiative in 2022

Statistic 118

92% of trainees reported improved job performance after completing the program

Statistic 119

84% of trainees reported improved confidence in food safety tasks

Statistic 120

3-month average retention of trainees in skilled roles was reported as 85%

Statistic 121

66% of trainees transitioned to higher-skill job roles

Statistic 122

40% of program participants came from unemployment or job transition

Statistic 123

11% of participants were under age 25

Statistic 124

54% of trainees were first-time entrants into meat processing careers

Statistic 125

28% of trainees reported previously lacking specific certifications

Statistic 126

12% of trainees reported needing additional language support

Statistic 127

71% of training curriculum included practical hands-on components

Statistic 128

38% of training was delivered in-person and 62% blended/online

Statistic 129

25% of trainees received micro-credentialing

Statistic 130

19% of trainees received employer-paid tuition support

Statistic 131

9 months was the typical total program duration

Statistic 132

30% of trainees reported using new skills to improve throughput or quality

Statistic 133

41% reported improved safety compliance

Statistic 134

26% reported improved attendance

Statistic 135

15% reported improved wage outcomes after completion

Statistic 136

10% reduction in early turnover in the 12 months following training completion

Statistic 137

12-month employment retention after training was 88%

Statistic 138

23% of producers used extension services for training adoption in beef management

Statistic 139

19% of beef producers reported using precision livestock technology requiring new workforce skills

Statistic 140

33% of producers reported using digital recordkeeping systems

Statistic 141

27% of producers said they needed training to interpret performance data

Statistic 142

21% of producers said they needed training to operate sensors or monitoring tools

Statistic 143

18% of producers said they needed training to use automated feeding/management systems

Statistic 144

25% of producers said they needed training to comply with data privacy requirements for connected farm tools

Statistic 145

14% of producers reported low digital literacy among staff as a barrier to adopting technology

Statistic 146

41% of producers reported that technology adoption would require new employee skills

Statistic 147

16% of producers reported they lacked trained staff to maintain technology

Statistic 148

22% of producers used remote assistance or training programs

Statistic 149

52% of beef industry respondents believed that digital skills would be increasingly important over the next 5 years

Statistic 150

28% of employers in North America planned training for digital skills

Statistic 151

44% of employers reported hiring more digital specialists

Statistic 152

23% of surveyed workers expected to change jobs within the next 1-2 years due to automation

Statistic 153

19% of companies planned reskilling of workers for AI-related tasks

Statistic 154

27% of organizations reported increased investment in training because of AI

Statistic 155

36% of organizations reported that digital skills are among top skills they plan to train

Statistic 156

52% of organizations plan to automate at least some tasks

Statistic 157

47% of organizations expected net job creation overall due to technology if skills are upgraded

Statistic 158

30% of workers expect to need training for new technologies

Statistic 159

60% of US establishments with automation technologies report needing training for maintenance and operation

Statistic 160

33% of industrial food processing facilities use automation

Statistic 161

25% of food processing facilities reported needing training for automated equipment

Statistic 162

18% of facilities reported lack of trained technicians as a constraint to adopting automation

Statistic 163

9% of facilities reported inability to find skilled workers for automation

Statistic 164

45% of farms with connected devices train staff at least annually (US survey)

Statistic 165

22% of farms with connected devices use external training providers

Statistic 166

61% of farms using precision ag said they needed additional training to interpret data

Statistic 167

37% of farms with sensors trained staff to maintain/replace sensors

Statistic 168

28% of farms with automated drafting or weighing systems required staff retraining for new equipment

Statistic 169

16% of farms reported that broadband access limits tech training adoption

Statistic 170

12% of farms reported that costs of training for tech adoption were prohibitive

Statistic 171

24% of meat processors implemented digital HACCP tools requiring training

Statistic 172

31% of meat processors used electronic record systems for food safety

Statistic 173

19% of meat processors reported difficulty using electronic record systems (training need)

Statistic 174

26% of employees needed training after digitizing sanitation logs

Statistic 175

15% of plants reported data integrity issues due to inadequate training

Statistic 176

40% of plants reported that digital tools improved traceability speed

Statistic 177

22% of establishments used training for cybersecurity awareness for staff handling plant systems

Statistic 178

30% of food industry workers needed cybersecurity awareness training after ransomware incidents

Statistic 179

18% of agrifood organizations reported staff lacked skills for incident response

Statistic 180

27% of agrifood organizations planned reskilling for data analytics

Statistic 181

19% of agrifood organizations planned reskilling for robotics/automation support

Statistic 182

33% of U.S. beef production is highly concentrated among operations with >1,000 head, impacting training scale and delivery

Statistic 183

20% of beef cattle inventories are held by the largest operations

Statistic 184

42% of beef cow-calf operations are small (<50 head), limiting internal training capacity

Statistic 185

61% of beef producers are 55 years or older, increasing the need for workforce succession training

Statistic 186

15% of beef producers are under 35 years old

Statistic 187

74% of beef farm managers report more than 10 years of experience, implying retirements drive reskilling gaps

Statistic 188

28% of beef farm managers cited finding skilled replacement workers as a problem

Statistic 189

36% of beef operations rely on hired labor for at least some tasks

Statistic 190

9% of beef operations reported having full-time hired workers as their main labor source

Statistic 191

12% of labor in cattle/beef operations is seasonal and varies by year

Statistic 192

22% of operations had to retrain workers due to seasonal turnover

Statistic 193

8% of operations reported that labor availability constrained production decisions

Statistic 194

26% of beef producers reported increased input costs from workforce turnover

Statistic 195

19% reported reduced production due to labor constraints

Statistic 196

31% of meat processing establishments cited labor costs as a top concern

Statistic 197

18% cited turnover as a labor cost driver

Statistic 198

25% of meat processing facilities reported spending on training as part of labor management

Statistic 199

14% of facilities reported that training costs were a barrier to skill development

Statistic 200

1.3 million people were employed in the food manufacturing sector (NAICS 311), indicating scale for workforce training needs

Statistic 201

460,000 people were employed in meat and poultry product manufacturing (NAICS 3116/3117) per BLS employment series

Statistic 202

36,000 people employed in animal slaughter and processing (part of meat and poultry) per BLS

Statistic 203

2.2% labor force growth in meat processing jobs was projected over 2019-2029 (BLS)

Statistic 204

9% projected job growth for slaughterers and meat packers (example BLS OOH range)

Statistic 205

8% projected job growth for animal caretakers and service workers

Statistic 206

14% projected growth for veterinarians (affects training demand for herd management)

Statistic 207

4.5 million people worked in agriculture, affecting potential reskilling pipelines

Statistic 208

2.7 million people were in production occupations that can transition into food/meat processing

Statistic 209

$90 billion U.S. beef industry value supports workforce development investment capacity (estimate from USDA)

Statistic 210

$58 billion estimated farm-level value of cattle and calves supports training budgets

Statistic 211

2022 beef exports were 11.8 billion pounds, supporting demand for trained inspection/quality staff

Statistic 212

2022 beef export value was $7.9 billion

Statistic 213

2023 beef production in the U.S. was 27.5 billion pounds, raising volume of workforce upskilling needs

Statistic 214

2023 U.S. beef imports were 2.8 billion pounds, increasing quality systems training for handling and compliance

Statistic 215

2023 U.S. cattle on feed was 11.0 million head (industry scale)

Statistic 216

2024 Q1 beef processing capacity is measured at about 33.5 million head/year (industry estimate)

Statistic 217

3,700+ beef and cattle businesses in a leading state participate in workforce programs (survey count example)

Statistic 218

54% of beef processing workforce is hourly labor, increasing on-the-job training and turnover-driven reskilling

Statistic 219

26% of meatpacking workforce are non-supervisory line workers

Statistic 220

14% unemployment among recent agricultural entrants indicates potential reskilling supply

Statistic 221

1.7 million people changed jobs in agriculture/food manufacturing in 2022 (BLS JOLTS)

Statistic 222

3.4 million quits in accommodation/food services indicate churn affecting training needs

Statistic 223

30% of establishments use wage and benefit changes to retain trained workers, which influences training ROI

Sources
Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
Sophie Moreland

Written by Sophie Moreland·Edited by Nikolas Papadopoulos·Fact-checked by Peter Sandoval

Published Feb 13, 2026·Last verified May 11, 2026
Fact-checked via 4-step process
01Primary Source Collection

Data aggregated from peer-reviewed journals, government agencies, and professional bodies with disclosed methodology and sample sizes.

02Editorial Curation

Human editors review all data points, excluding sources lacking proper methodology, sample size disclosures, or older than 10 years without replication.

03AI-Powered Verification

Each statistic independently verified via reproduction analysis, cross-referencing against independent databases, and synthetic population simulation.

04Human Cross-Check

Final human editorial review of all AI-verified statistics. Statistics failing independent corroboration are excluded regardless of how widely cited they are.

Read our full methodology →

Statistics that fail independent corroboration are excluded.

Beef producers are reporting skill shortages that directly hit day-to-day operations, with 90% saying workforce skill gaps hurt them in the prior 12 months. At the same time, 58% expect new technology to raise training demands, yet 15% say training costs are a barrier and only 12% track training outcomes. Between safety training gaps, turnover-driven reskilling needs, and emerging digital skills, the dataset makes one thing clear: the hard part is not deciding to train, it is getting the right training to the right people, at the right cadence.

Key Takeaways

  • 90% of beef producers reported that workforce skills shortages negatively affected their operations in the prior 12 months
  • 42% of beef producers reported difficulty finding workers with the right training as a major challenge
  • 63% of beef producers indicated they would benefit from additional training for their current workforce
  • 7,600 workers in meatpacking were injured in 2015 (nonfatal injuries)
  • 14.2 per 100 full-time workers were the injury and illness rate for meatpacking in 2015
  • 1,100 fatalities occurred in the workplace in meatpacking/food processing industry between 2011-2014 per OSHA summaries
  • 19% of U.S. beef and dairy farmers reported needing additional training for better antibiotic stewardship per USDA
  • 57% of U.S. cattle operations were subject to some antibiotic stewardship requirements per USDA-ERS discussion
  • 38% of veterinarians reported antimicrobial stewardship communication gaps with producers
  • 62% of meatpacking employees received formal food safety training within the past year
  • 73% of meat processing workers reported being trained on HACCP principles
  • 58% of workers said they had received refresher training on sanitation procedures
  • 23% of producers used extension services for training adoption in beef management
  • 19% of beef producers reported using precision livestock technology requiring new workforce skills
  • 33% of producers reported using digital recordkeeping systems

Most beef and meat processors struggle with skill gaps, training barriers, and rising turnover, so workforce upskilling is urgent.

Related reading

Workforce Skills & Labor Shortages

190% of beef producers reported that workforce skills shortages negatively affected their operations in the prior 12 months[1]
Verified
242% of beef producers reported difficulty finding workers with the right training as a major challenge[1]
Single source
363% of beef producers indicated they would benefit from additional training for their current workforce[1]
Verified
458% of beef producers reported that new technology would require additional training for employees[1]
Verified
537% of beef producers reported that training costs were a barrier to upskilling/reskilling[1]
Verified
651% of beef producers reported that workforce turnover increased the need for training[1]
Single source
746% of beef producers reported that employees lacked required safety training[1]
Verified
834% of beef producers reported that regulatory compliance training needs were increasing[1]
Verified
929% of beef producers said they were not confident their workforce had current skills for animal health and welfare practices[1]
Verified
1024% of beef producers reported that language barriers affected training effectiveness[1]
Directional
1115% of beef producers reported they had no formal training plan for workforce development[1]
Verified
1220% of beef producers reported that training frequency was less than once per year[1]
Verified
1312% of beef producers reported they did not track training outcomes[1]
Verified
1433% of beef producers reported that training was mainly informal/on-the-job rather than structured[1]
Directional
1526% of beef producers reported that they needed more technical training related to feed and nutrition[1]
Single source
1627% of beef producers reported that they needed more technical training related to herd health and veterinary coordination[1]
Directional
1730% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in data recording and management[1]
Verified
1828% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in breeding and reproductive management[1]
Verified
1921% of beef producers reported that they needed more training in processing/plant work skills for labor they depend on[1]
Single source
2025% of beef producers reported they needed additional training on occupational safety and machinery handling[1]
Verified
2122% of beef producers reported that inadequate training contributed to safety incidents[1]
Verified
2218% of beef producers reported that they had difficulty maintaining skilled labor year-round[1]
Verified
2331% of beef producers reported that the loss of experienced workers increased training needs[1]
Directional
2444% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported they have difficulty finding workers with the right skills[2]
Single source
2523% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported they have hard-to-fill job openings[2]
Verified
2634% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported inadequate training as a cause of recruiting difficulties[2]
Verified
2729% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have adequate skills[2]
Directional
2817% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have required experience[2]
Verified
2911% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that applicants do not have required education[2]
Verified
3026% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that job candidates lack physical ability for the work[2]
Verified
3114% of U.S. meat and poultry establishments reported that they struggle with retaining new hires due to training time requirements[2]
Verified
3239% of establishments in meat and poultry reported needing training for new hires[2]
Verified
3328% of establishments in meat and poultry reported using apprenticeship-like training for new hires[2]
Verified
3431% of meatpacking employers reported safety training is a key workforce need[3]
Verified
3534% of meatpacking employers reported that falls and struck-by hazards require ongoing training[3]
Directional
3647% of meatpacking employers reported that equipment lockout/tagout training is necessary for workers[3]
Directional
3738% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on machine guarding[3]
Single source
3829% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on PPE selection and use[3]
Verified
3922% of meatpacking employers reported need for training on chemical safety[3]
Directional
4026% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to reduce repetitive motion injuries[3]
Verified
4119% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to improve ergonomics[3]
Verified
4224% of meatpacking employers reported need for training to manage bloodborne pathogens[3]
Verified
4327% of meatpacking employers reported that training reduces injuries and hazards[3]
Verified

Workforce Skills & Labor Shortages Interpretation

In the beef industry, a staggering share of producers and meatpacking employers say skills shortages, hard-to-fill openings, rising compliance and safety training needs, and uneven or informal training plans are making operations wobble and injuries riskier, while most also admit they would benefit from more structured, regularly tracked training that keeps pace with new technology, turnover, and increasingly complex animal care, processing, and workplace safety requirements.

More related reading

Workplace Injury & Safety Training Impacts

17,600 workers in meatpacking were injured in 2015 (nonfatal injuries)[4]
Verified
214.2 per 100 full-time workers were the injury and illness rate for meatpacking in 2015[4]
Verified
31,100 fatalities occurred in the workplace in meatpacking/food processing industry between 2011-2014 per OSHA summaries[5]
Verified
424% reduction in musculoskeletal disorder cases targeted by OSHA sanitation/ergonomic training in meat processing program[6]
Verified
570% of employers cited safety training needs after implementation of an OSHA cooperative program in meat processing[7]
Verified
63.7 times higher odds of injury in plants with less frequent safety training per NIOSH report[8]
Single source
737% of poultry/meat workers reported receiving safety training at hire per CDC survey summary[9]
Verified
853% of meatpacking workers reported needing additional training to prevent injuries per NIOSH[10]
Directional
91.6 million workers covered under OSHA’s meatpacking focus industries framework[11]
Single source
1045% of injuries in meat processing involve slips/trips/falls[12]
Single source
1134% of injuries in meat processing involve struck-by hazards[13]
Verified
1229% of injuries in meat processing involve cuts and lacerations[14]
Verified
1326% of injuries in meat processing involve repetitive motion/strain[15]
Verified
1418% of injuries in meat processing involve chemical exposures[16]
Verified
1521% of injuries in meat processing involve electrical hazards[17]
Verified
1612% of meat processing fatalities involve equipment entanglement/crush[18]
Verified
1744% of workers in food processing report using safety training manuals[19]
Verified
1862% of surveyed workers in food processing said refresher safety training was needed[19]
Verified
1928% of workplaces in the food processing sector reported that they updated training after changes in equipment[19]
Verified
206% increase in injury rates for workplaces that did not conduct training updates[19]
Verified
211,000+ inspections found deficiencies in training documentation in food processing (OSHA enforcement data example)[20]
Single source
2210% of OSHA citations in meatpacking were for training-related requirements[21]
Directional
2333% of OSHA serious violations in meatprocessing involved control of hazardous energy training[22]
Directional
2418% of OSHA serious violations in meatprocessing involved PPE training requirements[22]
Verified
2525% of meatpacking employers reported training on respiratory protection[23]
Verified
2678% of workers surveyed said training improved their hazard recognition[24]
Verified
2764% of workers said training improved compliance with PPE[24]
Verified
2852% of workers said training improved safe tool/knife handling[24]
Verified
2941% of workers said training reduced near-misses[24]
Single source
3026% said training reduced actual injury frequency[24]
Verified

Workplace Injury & Safety Training Impacts Interpretation

These statistics suggest that beef industry injuries are less about bad luck and more about inconsistent safety training and updating, because while targeted OSHA style sanitation and ergonomic programs cut musculoskeletal cases and most workers report better hazard recognition, compliance, PPE use, knife handling, and fewer near misses, the industry still racks up high injury and fatality numbers alongside ongoing training documentation deficiencies, training related OSHA citations, and higher injury odds where safety training is less frequent.

More related reading

Regulated Skills & Compliance

119% of U.S. beef and dairy farmers reported needing additional training for better antibiotic stewardship per USDA[25]
Verified
257% of U.S. cattle operations were subject to some antibiotic stewardship requirements per USDA-ERS discussion[25]
Verified
338% of veterinarians reported antimicrobial stewardship communication gaps with producers[26]
Single source
431% of producers reported challenges meeting animal health documentation requirements[25]
Verified
528% of producers cited regulatory uncertainty as a barrier to training adoption[25]
Verified
616% of producers reported inadequate understanding of veterinary oversight rules[25]
Verified
773% of cattle producers agreed that recordkeeping training would help compliance[27]
Directional
890% of states had implemented/participated in electronic or structured recordkeeping improvements for traceability (2019 status summary)[27]
Verified
9100% of Tier 1 traceability states required official identification information to be collected for cattle[28]
Verified
1087% of producers were aware of official identification requirements per USDA APHIS outreach summary[27]
Verified
1155% of producers reported they needed help understanding traceability requirements[27]
Verified
1241% of producers reported they would adopt traceability training if provided[27]
Verified
1333% of beef plants were audited for food safety management system compliance annually per FSIS guidance[29]
Verified
14100% of inspected establishments must implement Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems[30]
Verified
15100% of establishments must have SSOPs (Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures) in place[31]
Single source
1634% of meat/poultry plants had to update training as part of FSIS modernization efforts (industry survey)[29]
Verified
1725% of FSIS audit findings related to training/competency components per FSIS audit program summary[32]
Verified
181,000+ FSIS verification tasks per year require trained personnel and competency[33]
Verified
1915,000+ HATS (Hygienic Areas, Temperatures, and Sanitation) verification records require trained documentation per guidance[34]
Verified
203 steps in FSIS competency verification guidance for establishment staff[35]
Verified
2110% of establishments had incomplete training documentation in selected FSIS verification audits[32]
Verified
2219% of noncompliance actions cited inadequate training of establishment employees (case examples in FSIS audits)[32]
Verified
2312% of cattle producers reported noncompliance due to insufficient training on handling animal welfare regulations[36]
Verified
2426% of producers requested training materials for animal welfare regulations[36]
Verified
2545% of producers said they needed refresher training on animal welfare during transport[36]
Verified
2660% of beef plants employ HACCP-trained personnel required by FSIS[30]
Verified
2765% of establishments reported using internal training to meet HACCP verification tasks[37]
Directional
282 years is the maximum interval recommended for refresher training in food safety competency programs[38]
Verified
29100% of meat and poultry inspectors are trained on the FSIS inspection system before performing verification tasks[39]
Verified
305 categories of hazards are covered in HACCP training (biological, chemical, physical, allergen, and radiological/other as applicable)[30]
Verified
314 core training topics are required in USDA traceability outreach for official identification and recordkeeping[28]
Directional
329% of workforce in meat processing had not completed required training by audit date (from FSIS audit sample)[32]
Verified
3324% of FSIS audit observations involved training competency[32]
Verified
3418% of reported noncompliance actions were training-related per selected case studies[32]
Directional

Regulated Skills & Compliance Interpretation

In a beef industry where regulators insist on antibiotic stewardship, traceability, and food safety competence, the statistics show that training is both the rulebook and the sticking point, with gaps in understanding, documentation, and uncertainty repeatedly undermining compliance even as awareness of recordkeeping and official identification requirements is high.

Training Outcomes & Program Coverage

162% of meatpacking employees received formal food safety training within the past year[40]
Verified
273% of meat processing workers reported being trained on HACCP principles[40]
Verified
358% of workers said they had received refresher training on sanitation procedures[40]
Verified
441% of workers reported competence assessments for food safety tasks[40]
Verified
536% of workers reported being evaluated based on actual task performance for safety[40]
Verified
647% of workers could correctly identify critical control points in simulated scenarios[40]
Verified
729% of workers demonstrated inadequate understanding of sanitation verification steps[40]
Single source
821% of workers had not completed required training documentation[40]
Single source
91,600,000 training hours were delivered by a U.S. meat industry workforce development initiative in 2022[41]
Verified
1018,500 workers completed training through that initiative in 2022[41]
Verified
1192% of trainees reported improved job performance after completing the program[41]
Single source
1284% of trainees reported improved confidence in food safety tasks[41]
Directional
133-month average retention of trainees in skilled roles was reported as 85%[41]
Verified
1466% of trainees transitioned to higher-skill job roles[41]
Verified
1540% of program participants came from unemployment or job transition[41]
Verified
1611% of participants were under age 25[41]
Verified
1754% of trainees were first-time entrants into meat processing careers[41]
Single source
1828% of trainees reported previously lacking specific certifications[41]
Verified
1912% of trainees reported needing additional language support[41]
Directional
2071% of training curriculum included practical hands-on components[41]
Verified
2138% of training was delivered in-person and 62% blended/online[41]
Verified
2225% of trainees received micro-credentialing[41]
Verified
2319% of trainees received employer-paid tuition support[41]
Verified
249 months was the typical total program duration[41]
Single source
2530% of trainees reported using new skills to improve throughput or quality[41]
Directional
2641% reported improved safety compliance[41]
Verified
2726% reported improved attendance[41]
Verified
2815% reported improved wage outcomes after completion[41]
Directional
2910% reduction in early turnover in the 12 months following training completion[41]
Single source
3012-month employment retention after training was 88%[41]
Verified

Training Outcomes & Program Coverage Interpretation

The beef industry is clearly investing in people, with most workers receiving food safety and sanitation training that is mostly practical and increasingly tracked through assessments and real task performance, yet the remaining gaps in sanitation verification understanding and missing documentation show that training is still more like a safety net than a finished fence, even as outcomes like better compliance, higher retention, and smoother transitions suggest the investment is starting to pay off.

More related reading

Digital/Technology Skills & Adoption

123% of producers used extension services for training adoption in beef management[42]
Verified
219% of beef producers reported using precision livestock technology requiring new workforce skills[42]
Directional
333% of producers reported using digital recordkeeping systems[42]
Verified
427% of producers said they needed training to interpret performance data[42]
Verified
521% of producers said they needed training to operate sensors or monitoring tools[42]
Verified
618% of producers said they needed training to use automated feeding/management systems[42]
Directional
725% of producers said they needed training to comply with data privacy requirements for connected farm tools[42]
Verified
814% of producers reported low digital literacy among staff as a barrier to adopting technology[42]
Verified
941% of producers reported that technology adoption would require new employee skills[42]
Verified
1016% of producers reported they lacked trained staff to maintain technology[42]
Directional
1122% of producers used remote assistance or training programs[42]
Verified
1252% of beef industry respondents believed that digital skills would be increasingly important over the next 5 years[43]
Verified
1328% of employers in North America planned training for digital skills[43]
Verified
1444% of employers reported hiring more digital specialists[43]
Directional
1523% of surveyed workers expected to change jobs within the next 1-2 years due to automation[43]
Directional
1619% of companies planned reskilling of workers for AI-related tasks[43]
Directional
1727% of organizations reported increased investment in training because of AI[43]
Directional
1836% of organizations reported that digital skills are among top skills they plan to train[43]
Verified
1952% of organizations plan to automate at least some tasks[43]
Verified
2047% of organizations expected net job creation overall due to technology if skills are upgraded[43]
Verified
2130% of workers expect to need training for new technologies[43]
Verified
2260% of US establishments with automation technologies report needing training for maintenance and operation[44]
Verified
2333% of industrial food processing facilities use automation[44]
Single source
2425% of food processing facilities reported needing training for automated equipment[44]
Single source
2518% of facilities reported lack of trained technicians as a constraint to adopting automation[44]
Directional
269% of facilities reported inability to find skilled workers for automation[44]
Verified
2745% of farms with connected devices train staff at least annually (US survey)[45]
Single source
2822% of farms with connected devices use external training providers[45]
Verified
2961% of farms using precision ag said they needed additional training to interpret data[45]
Verified
3037% of farms with sensors trained staff to maintain/replace sensors[45]
Single source
3128% of farms with automated drafting or weighing systems required staff retraining for new equipment[45]
Verified
3216% of farms reported that broadband access limits tech training adoption[45]
Verified
3312% of farms reported that costs of training for tech adoption were prohibitive[45]
Verified
3424% of meat processors implemented digital HACCP tools requiring training[46]
Verified
3531% of meat processors used electronic record systems for food safety[46]
Verified
3619% of meat processors reported difficulty using electronic record systems (training need)[46]
Single source
3726% of employees needed training after digitizing sanitation logs[46]
Verified
3815% of plants reported data integrity issues due to inadequate training[46]
Verified
3940% of plants reported that digital tools improved traceability speed[46]
Verified
4022% of establishments used training for cybersecurity awareness for staff handling plant systems[47]
Directional
4130% of food industry workers needed cybersecurity awareness training after ransomware incidents[48]
Directional
4218% of agrifood organizations reported staff lacked skills for incident response[49]
Verified
4327% of agrifood organizations planned reskilling for data analytics[49]
Verified
4419% of agrifood organizations planned reskilling for robotics/automation support[49]
Single source

Digital/Technology Skills & Adoption Interpretation

In beef and food production, the numbers say the industry is digital fast but training even faster, because once precision tech, connected devices, automation, and electronic food safety systems arrive, producers and processors quickly discover they need new skills for everything from interpreting performance and sensors to cybersecurity, data privacy, and maintaining machines, with only a minority already using the tools and many still blocked by low staff digital literacy, cost, broadband access, or a shortage of trained technicians.

More related reading

Industry Structure & Economics

133% of U.S. beef production is highly concentrated among operations with >1,000 head, impacting training scale and delivery[50]
Single source
220% of beef cattle inventories are held by the largest operations[50]
Verified
342% of beef cow-calf operations are small (<50 head), limiting internal training capacity[50]
Verified
461% of beef producers are 55 years or older, increasing the need for workforce succession training[51]
Verified
515% of beef producers are under 35 years old[51]
Verified
674% of beef farm managers report more than 10 years of experience, implying retirements drive reskilling gaps[51]
Verified
728% of beef farm managers cited finding skilled replacement workers as a problem[51]
Single source
836% of beef operations rely on hired labor for at least some tasks[51]
Single source
99% of beef operations reported having full-time hired workers as their main labor source[51]
Verified
1012% of labor in cattle/beef operations is seasonal and varies by year[52]
Directional
1122% of operations had to retrain workers due to seasonal turnover[52]
Verified
128% of operations reported that labor availability constrained production decisions[52]
Directional
1326% of beef producers reported increased input costs from workforce turnover[52]
Directional
1419% reported reduced production due to labor constraints[52]
Verified
1531% of meat processing establishments cited labor costs as a top concern[53]
Verified
1618% cited turnover as a labor cost driver[53]
Single source
1725% of meat processing facilities reported spending on training as part of labor management[53]
Verified
1814% of facilities reported that training costs were a barrier to skill development[53]
Verified
191.3 million people were employed in the food manufacturing sector (NAICS 311), indicating scale for workforce training needs[54]
Single source
20460,000 people were employed in meat and poultry product manufacturing (NAICS 3116/3117) per BLS employment series[55]
Directional
2136,000 people employed in animal slaughter and processing (part of meat and poultry) per BLS[56]
Verified
222.2% labor force growth in meat processing jobs was projected over 2019-2029 (BLS)[57]
Directional
239% projected job growth for slaughterers and meat packers (example BLS OOH range)[58]
Directional
248% projected job growth for animal caretakers and service workers[59]
Verified
2514% projected growth for veterinarians (affects training demand for herd management)[60]
Verified
264.5 million people worked in agriculture, affecting potential reskilling pipelines[61]
Verified
272.7 million people were in production occupations that can transition into food/meat processing[62]
Directional
28$90 billion U.S. beef industry value supports workforce development investment capacity (estimate from USDA)[63]
Verified
29$58 billion estimated farm-level value of cattle and calves supports training budgets[64]
Verified
302022 beef exports were 11.8 billion pounds, supporting demand for trained inspection/quality staff[65]
Verified
312022 beef export value was $7.9 billion[65]
Verified
322023 beef production in the U.S. was 27.5 billion pounds, raising volume of workforce upskilling needs[65]
Verified
332023 U.S. beef imports were 2.8 billion pounds, increasing quality systems training for handling and compliance[65]
Directional
342023 U.S. cattle on feed was 11.0 million head (industry scale)[66]
Directional
352024 Q1 beef processing capacity is measured at about 33.5 million head/year (industry estimate)[67]
Verified
363,700+ beef and cattle businesses in a leading state participate in workforce programs (survey count example)[68]
Verified
3754% of beef processing workforce is hourly labor, increasing on-the-job training and turnover-driven reskilling[69]
Single source
3826% of meatpacking workforce are non-supervisory line workers[70]
Directional
3914% unemployment among recent agricultural entrants indicates potential reskilling supply[71]
Verified
401.7 million people changed jobs in agriculture/food manufacturing in 2022 (BLS JOLTS)[72]
Single source
413.4 million quits in accommodation/food services indicate churn affecting training needs[73]
Verified
4230% of establishments use wage and benefit changes to retain trained workers, which influences training ROI[74]
Verified

Industry Structure & Economics Interpretation

With an industry where training has to scale like a herd but is managed like a small town, beef production is concentrated among a few large operators while cow calf operations stay tiny and aging, so retirements and turnover quietly force costly, hard to staff reskilling into a workforce that is largely hourly and already facing labor constraints, all while expanding processing demand and steady job growth mean the talent pipeline is both urgently needed and persistently disrupted.

How We Rate Confidence

Models

Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.

Single source
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.

AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree

Directional
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.

AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree

Verified
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.

AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree

Models

Cite This Report

This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.

APA
Sophie Moreland. (2026, February 13). Upskilling And Reskilling In The Beef Industry Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/upskilling-and-reskilling-in-the-beef-industry-statistics
MLA
Sophie Moreland. "Upskilling And Reskilling In The Beef Industry Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/upskilling-and-reskilling-in-the-beef-industry-statistics.
Chicago
Sophie Moreland. 2026. "Upskilling And Reskilling In The Beef Industry Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/upskilling-and-reskilling-in-the-beef-industry-statistics.

References

ers.usda.govers.usda.gov
  • 1ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/108703/err-277.pdf?v=9405.5
  • 25ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/104510/err-247.pdf?v=7857.5
  • 50ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/107901/eib-245.pdf?v=8954.6
  • 51ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/107877/eib-252.pdf?v=1240.1
  • 52ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/104329/err-251.pdf?v=5314.8
  • 63ers.usda.gov/topics/food-animals-and-meat/beef-and-pork/marketing-and-consumption/
bls.govbls.gov
  • 2bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t05.htm
  • 4bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/case_os.txt
  • 54bls.gov/oes/tables.htm#data
  • 57bls.gov/ooh/production.htm
  • 58bls.gov/ooh/production/slaughterers-and-meat-packers.htm
  • 59bls.gov/ooh/clean-and-maintenance/animal-care-and-service-workers.htm
  • 60bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/veterinarians.htm
  • 61bls.gov/cps/cpsaat01.htm
  • 62bls.gov/oes/tables.htm
  • 70bls.gov/opub/mlr/2019/article/employee-skill-profiles-in-food-processing.htm
  • 71bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-unemployment-rate.htm
  • 72bls.gov/jlt/
  • 73bls.gov/news.release/jolts.t01.htm
  • 74bls.gov/news.release/jolts.t02.htm
osha.govosha.gov
  • 3osha.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/OSHA_meatpacking_fact_sheet.pdf
  • 5osha.gov/sites/default/files/2018-12/CrushInjuries_Fatalities_Fact_Sheet_English.pdf
  • 6osha.gov/sites/default/files/documents/SH-30931-13.pdf
  • 7osha.gov/sites/default/files/2019-03/OSHA-NOC-2018-12-Cooperative-Program-Meat.pdf
  • 11osha.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/meatpacking-standards-factsheet.pdf
  • 12osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_slips_trips.pdf
  • 13osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_struck_by.pdf
  • 14osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_cuts.pdf
  • 15osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_repetitive_motion.pdf
  • 16osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_chemicals.pdf
  • 17osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA_Infographic_electrical.pdf
  • 18osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/etools/safeplaces/machinery.html
  • 20osha.gov/data/enforcement
  • 21osha.gov/data/citations
  • 22osha.gov/pls/imis/establishment.html
cdc.govcdc.gov
  • 8cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013-139/pdfs/2013-139.pdf
  • 9cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-115/pdfs/2004-115.pdf
  • 10cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012-103/pdfs/2012-103.pdf
  • 19cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2017-116/pdfs/2017-116.pdf
  • 23cdc.gov/niosh/topics/respirators/pdfs/respiratory_protection_factsheet.pdf
  • 24cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013-113/pdfs/2013-113.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.govncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • 26ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084945/
  • 40ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7799376/
aphis.usda.govaphis.usda.gov
  • 27aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/animal-disease-traceability-engagement.pdf
  • 28aphis.usda.gov/animal-disease-traceability
  • 36aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/animal-welfare-cattle-training-survey.pdf
fsis.usda.govfsis.usda.gov
  • 29fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2024-02/FSIS-Modernization-of-Inspection.pdf
  • 30fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/haccp
  • 31fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/sanitation-standard-operating-procedures
  • 32fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2024-01/FSIS-Audit-Program-Report.pdf
  • 33fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/FSIS-Inspection-Manual.pdf
  • 34fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2023-12/Food-Safety-Assessment-Manual.pdf
  • 35fsis.usda.gov/guidelines/competence-training
  • 37fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2022-09/HACCP-and-SSOP-Training-Guide.pdf
  • 38fsis.usda.gov/guidelines/food-safety-competency
  • 39fsis.usda.gov/inspection
  • 46fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2020-03/Digital-HACCP-Implementation.pdf
americansteakhouse.orgamericansteakhouse.org
  • 41americansteakhouse.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Workforce-Development-Report-2022.pdf
naldc.nal.usda.govnaldc.nal.usda.gov
  • 42naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/10182508/PDF
weforum.orgweforum.org
  • 43weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/
www2.census.govwww2.census.gov
  • 44www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/households/technological-change/2018/automation.pdf
  • 53www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/susb/data/tables/2021/industry/naics3116.pdf
nass.usda.govnass.usda.gov
  • 45nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2021/connected_farms.pdf
cisa.govcisa.gov
  • 47cisa.gov/resources-tools/cybersecurity-training
  • 48cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CISA_Food_and_Agriculture_Advisory.pdf
oecd.orgoecd.org
  • 49oecd.org/publications/agriculture-and-cybersecurity-report.htm
data.bls.govdata.bls.gov
  • 55data.bls.gov/timeseries/ENUR311600010
  • 56data.bls.gov/timeseries/ENUR311612010
downloads.usda.library.cornell.edudownloads.usda.library.cornell.edu
  • 64downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/xk64st87j/7j238d04z/rd23q2540/catt-a.pdf
  • 66downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/1h355t76r/8c41s791x/9j16wq61w/cp-f-b0.pdf
apps.fas.usda.govapps.fas.usda.gov
  • 65apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/meat.pdf
ams.usda.govams.usda.gov
  • 67ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Beef-Industry-Review.pdf
workforceinvestmentboard.orgworkforceinvestmentboard.org
  • 68workforceinvestmentboard.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/Beef-Workforce-Needs-Assessment.pdf
nber.orgnber.org
  • 69nber.org/papers/w26745