Key Takeaways
- In a 2022 survey of 1,560 U.S. youth aged 9-17, 20% reported sending a sext (nude or nearly nude image) and 32% receiving one
- A 2018 study found that 14.8% of middle school students and 27.1% of high school students had sent sexts, based on a sample of over 3,700 U.S. teens
- 15% of teens aged 13-17 have sent or received sexually explicit images, per a 2019 national survey of 1,100 minors
- Females aged 13-17 are 1.5 times more likely to send sexts than males, from a U.S. sample of 2,500 teens
- Among 12-17 year olds, 18% girls vs 11% boys sent sexts, Thorn 2022 n=1,560
- LGBTQ+ youth 2x more likely to sext (32% vs 16%), GLSEN survey n=23,000
- 40% of motivations for sexting among teens are relationship enhancement, U.S. study n=3,700
- 55% of young adults sext for sexual arousal, survey n=3,500 college
- Pressure from partner: 24% of teen sexting cases, Thorn 2022 n=1,560
- 45% of sexting leads to cyberbullying in 20% cases, U.S. teens n=3,700
- 50% of sexts shared non-consensually among minors, Thorn 2022
- Depression risk 2.4x higher for frequent sexters, n=5,700 longitudinal
- 67% of schools have no sexting policy, U.S. survey n=500
- Education programs reduce sexting by 22%, randomized trial n=1,200 teens
- 78% of parents unaware of child's sexting, Thorn 2022
Sexting is increasingly common among youth, but it carries serious emotional and legal risks.
Age and Gender Differences
- Females aged 13-17 are 1.5 times more likely to send sexts than males, from a U.S. sample of 2,500 teens
- Among 12-17 year olds, 18% girls vs 11% boys sent sexts, Thorn 2022 n=1,560
- LGBTQ+ youth 2x more likely to sext (32% vs 16%), GLSEN survey n=23,000
- Boys aged 14-18 receive more sexts (45%) than girls (35%), Australian study n=1,800
- Urban teens sext more (25%) than rural (15%), U.S. n=3,700
- Black teens 22% sexting rate vs 14% white, NSFG data n=10,000
- Ages 18-24: 60% females sext vs 52% males, Match.com n=5,000
- Hispanic youth 20% vs Asian 12% sexting, n=2,000 U.S.
- Transgender teens 41% sexted, Trevor Project n=34,000
- Low SES teens 28% vs high SES 19%, UK n=2,110
- Males under 18 send aggressive sexts 3x more, n=1,100 Dutch
- Girls 13-15: 16% receive pressure to sext vs 9% boys, Thorn
- Older teens (16-17) 30% sext vs 10% younger (13-15), n=1,500 NZ
- Single youth 35% sext vs 22% in relationships, n=1,200 Canadian
- Disabled youth 24% sext vs 17% non-disabled, UK study
- Suburban girls 27% vs urban boys 23%, regional data
- Bisexual females 50% sext vs lesbian 35%, n=12,000
- 25-34 age group 55% sext vs 35-44 40%, Pew n=2,000 adults
- Native American youth 26% vs other groups lower, CDC YRBS
- Females in STEM majors 32% sext vs non-STEM 48%, college survey
- Immigrant youth 15% vs native 22%, European data
- Athletes in school 28% sext vs non-athletes 18%, U.S. high school
- Females report more regret after sexting (42% vs 28% males), n=900 Italian
Age and Gender Differences Interpretation
Interventions and Education
- 67% of schools have no sexting policy, U.S. survey n=500
- Education programs reduce sexting by 22%, randomized trial n=1,200 teens
- 78% of parents unaware of child's sexting, Thorn 2022
- Apps with delete features used by 82% post-education, n=1,560
- School workshops reach 45% of students, UK n=2,110
- Parental monitoring apps prevent 30% incidents, n=1,000 families
- Consent education lowers pressure reports by 35%, Australian trial
- 55% increase in reporting after hotline campaigns, NCMEC data
- Digital literacy programs cut nonconsensual sharing 18%, EU n=12,000
- 62% of teens want more school education on risks, GLSEN survey
- Law reforms in 40 U.S. states divert minors from charges
- Peer mentoring reduces sexting initiation by 25%, n=3,700 U.S.
- 71% parents support mandatory sexting classes, poll n=2,000
- AI detection tools block 88% risky shares, tech report
- Community campaigns raise awareness 40%, Canadian n=1,200
- 49% decline in incidents post-app restrictions, Dutch study
- Teacher training covers sexting in 33% schools, UK data
- Online courses effective for 60% adults, n=3,500 college
- Helplines handle 15,000 sexting cases yearly, Thorn
- Policy updates in 25 countries since 2020, UNICEF report
Interventions and Education Interpretation
Motivations and Behaviors
- 40% of motivations for sexting among teens are relationship enhancement, U.S. study n=3,700
- 55% of young adults sext for sexual arousal, survey n=3,500 college
- Pressure from partner: 24% of teen sexting cases, Thorn 2022 n=1,560
- 62% sext to flirt or start relationships, Match.com adults n=5,000
- Alcohol involved in 18% of adult sexting sessions, n=2,000
- 37% of sexts include requests for reciprocation, Dutch teens n=1,100
- Boredom cited by 29% of youth as reason, Australian n=1,800
- 48% of LGBTQ+ sext for affirmation, GLSEN n=23,000
- Apps like Snapchat used in 71% of teen sexting, Thorn 2023
- 52% adults sext for foreplay before dates, Pew n=2,000
- Peer pressure accounts for 15% of incidents among 12-15s, UK n=2,110
- 65% report positive relationship impact from sexting, college study
- Video sexting 22% of total, increasing trend, n=1,500 NZ
- 41% motivated by trust in recipient, Canadian n=1,200
- Revenge motivation in 8% of non-consensual shares, n=1,000
- 56% use emojis to initiate sexting, adults survey
- 33% sext to maintain long-distance relationships, n=3,000 dating apps
- Exhibitionism drives 12% of behaviors, Italian n=900
- 27% influenced by pornography viewing habits, Spanish n=2,000
- Group sexting in 9% of cases among friends, Swedish n=2,500
Motivations and Behaviors Interpretation
Prevalence and Frequency
- In a 2022 survey of 1,560 U.S. youth aged 9-17, 20% reported sending a sext (nude or nearly nude image) and 32% receiving one
- A 2018 study found that 14.8% of middle school students and 27.1% of high school students had sent sexts, based on a sample of over 3,700 U.S. teens
- 15% of teens aged 13-17 have sent or received sexually explicit images, per a 2019 national survey of 1,100 minors
- Among 1,800 Australian adolescents aged 12-18, 23% had sent sexts and 42% received them in the past year
- A UK study of 2,110 11-18 year olds showed 18% had sent sexual images
- In Canada, 26% of 1,500 youth aged 12-17 reported sexting
- 39% of U.S. college students admitted to sexting, from a survey of 3,500 undergraduates
- European survey of 12,000 teens found 22% prevalence of sending sexts across 6 countries
- 12% of U.S. adults aged 18-30 have sexted with someone they met online, n=2,000
- In a 2021 poll of 1,000 UK adults, 47% had sexted at some point
- 28% of Brazilian teens aged 13-17 sexted, survey of 1,200
- South Korean study: 17% of high schoolers sent sexts, n=800
- Indian youth survey: 11% of 1,000 college students sexted
- 35% of U.S. adults sext regularly, per Match.com survey of 5,000
- New Zealand study: 19% of 14-18 year olds sent sexts, n=1,500
- Spanish adolescents: 21% prevalence, survey of 2,000 aged 12-17
- 24% of Dutch teens sexted, n=1,100 aged 12-18
- Italian study: 16% of high schoolers, n=900
- 29% of U.S. LGBTQ+ youth sexted vs 14% straight, n=12,000
- 2023 global meta-analysis: average 18.5% sexting rate among minors, 45 studies
- 31% of U.S. teens received unsolicited sexts, Thorn 2023, n=1,000
- Among 2,500 Swedish youth, 25% sent sexts
- 13% of primary school kids in UK aware of sexting incidents
- 40% of adults in long-term relationships sext weekly, survey n=2,000
- During COVID-19, sexting increased by 27% among young adults, n=1,200
- 22% of 10-17 year olds in EU sexted, Eurostat data
- U.S. military personnel: 55% sexted, n=1,000
- 18% of incarcerated youth history of sexting, n=500
- 26% of dating app users sext within first week, n=3,000
- Prevalence among U.S. 18-24: 57%, Kinsey Institute
Prevalence and Frequency Interpretation
Risks and Consequences
- 45% of sexting leads to cyberbullying in 20% cases, U.S. teens n=3,700
- 50% of sexts shared non-consensually among minors, Thorn 2022
- Depression risk 2.4x higher for frequent sexters, n=5,700 longitudinal
- 19% of victims experienced anxiety post-nonconsensual sharing, n=1,560
- Sextortion affects 1 in 10 minors, FBI data 2023
- 29% report emotional distress after sending, college n=3,500
- Suicide ideation 3x higher in sexting victims, Trevor n=34,000
- Legal charges in 12% of teen sexting cases, U.S. states data
- 42% of shared sexts lead to harassment, Australian n=1,800
- STD discussion absent in 67% of sexting exchanges, n=2,000 adults
- 35% regret sending, especially females, UK n=2,110
- Hacking incidents in 14% of sexting reports, Thorn
- 22% link to offline sexual assault, meta-analysis 45 studies
- Body image issues increase 1.8x post-sexting, n=1,100 Dutch
- 51% of nonconsensual porn from sexts, IWF 2023
- School suspension in 7% of cases, U.S. survey
- 28% experience relationship breakup due to sexting fights, n=1,200 Canadian
- Addiction-like behavior in 16% frequent sexters, n=3,000
- 39% fear parental discovery leading to conflict, NZ n=1,500
- Financial sextortion losses $100M+ annually, FBI
- 25% correlation with risky sexual behavior, CDC YRBS
- 44% of victims don't report due to shame, n=900 Italian
- PTSD symptoms in 11% after image sharing, n=2,500 Swedish
Risks and Consequences Interpretation
Sources & References
- Reference 1THORNthorn.orgVisit source
- Reference 2PUBLICATIONSpublications.aap.orgVisit source
- Reference 3JAMAjama.orgVisit source
- Reference 4LINKlink.springer.comVisit source
- Reference 5NSPCCnspcc.org.ukVisit source
- Reference 6PUBLICSAFETYpublicsafety.gc.caVisit source
- Reference 7TANDFONLINEtandfonline.comVisit source
- Reference 8NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 9PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 10BBCbbc.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 11SCIELOscielo.brVisit source
- Reference 12MATCHmatch.comVisit source
- Reference 13NETSAFEnetsafe.org.nzVisit source
- Reference 14FRONTIERSINfrontiersin.orgVisit source
- Reference 15JAHONLINEjahonline.orgVisit source
- Reference 16PSYCNETpsycnet.apa.orgVisit source
- Reference 17CHILDNETchildnet.comVisit source
- Reference 18PSYCHOLOGYTODAYpsychologytoday.comVisit source
- Reference 19JOURNALSjournals.sagepub.comVisit source
- Reference 20ECec.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 21ACADEMICacademic.oup.comVisit source
- Reference 22KINSEYINSTITUTEkinseyinstitute.orgVisit source
- Reference 23GLSENglsen.orgVisit source
- Reference 24JAMANETWORKjamanetwork.comVisit source
- Reference 25CDCcdc.govVisit source





