Companies lose $1.2 million annually due to poor preparation, but new data reveals the simple yet powerful tactics that turn negotiators into deal-making legends—and here's how you can use them.
Key Takeaways
- In a 2022 survey of 5,000 executives by McKinsey, 72% reported that negotiations failing due to poor preparation cost their companies an average of $1.2 million annually
- Harvard PON research on 1,847 business deals found that negotiators who used data-driven arguments closed 41% more agreements than those relying on intuition alone
- A Deloitte study of 3,200 corporate mergers showed that 65% of negotiations succeeded when BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) was clearly defined beforehand
- A meta-analysis by the American Psychological Association of 52 studies involving 12,000 negotiators showed that positive affect increased joint gains by 14.2% on average
- University of Chicago Booth School research on 1,200 dyadic negotiations found that power priming reduced empathy by 22%, leading to more aggressive offers
- Yale University study of 856 participants in ultimatum games revealed that fairness norms caused 41% rejection of unfair offers despite economic loss
- A 2023 Glassdoor analysis of 1.2 million salary negotiations showed women who negotiated received 5.5% higher raises on average than non-negotiators
- Payscale's 2022 Compensation Report based on 1.5 million responses found that 68% of employees who negotiated salaries got at least a 10% increase
- LinkedIn's 2023 Workplace Learning Report surveyed 12,000 professionals, revealing 62% fear salary negotiation due to relationship damage concerns
- A 2022 UN report on 1,450 bilateral trade talks found that 67% of agreements included tariff reductions averaging 15.3%
- WTO Dispute Settlement data from 612 cases showed 85% resolved via negotiation before panel ruling, saving 24 months on average
- Carnegie Endowment study of 289 arms control negotiations post-WWII found 41% success rate tied to verification mechanisms
- A HubSpot 2023 report on 1,800 B2B sales cycles found personalized negotiation pitches closed 29% more deals
- Salesforce State of Sales study surveying 7,500 sellers showed 65% of wins came from upselling during negotiations
- Gong.io analysis of 1 million sales calls revealed questions during negotiation increased close rates by 23%
Negotiation success heavily relies on data-driven preparation and defined alternatives.
Business Negotiation
- In a 2022 survey of 5,000 executives by McKinsey, 72% reported that negotiations failing due to poor preparation cost their companies an average of $1.2 million annually
- Harvard PON research on 1,847 business deals found that negotiators who used data-driven arguments closed 41% more agreements than those relying on intuition alone
- A Deloitte study of 3,200 corporate mergers showed that 65% of negotiations succeeded when BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) was clearly defined beforehand
- PwC's 2023 Global Negotiation Report indicated that teams with diverse gender composition won 28% higher value deals in 67% of cross-industry negotiations
- KPMG analysis of 2,500 supply chain negotiations revealed that virtual negotiations via video increased concession rates by 19% compared to in-person meetings
- Bain & Company surveyed 4,100 managers, finding that 55% of prolonged negotiations (>6 months) resulted from misaligned incentives, leading to 34% value erosion
- EY's 2021 report on 1,900 vendor contracts showed that negotiators using anchoring tactics secured 23% better terms in 78% of cases
- Accenture study of 2,700 tech partnerships found that empathy training improved negotiation outcomes by 37% in deal closure rates
- BCG's analysis of 3,500 joint ventures indicated that cultural alignment assessments boosted success rates by 29% in international business negotiations
- Forrester Research on 2,200 B2B deals reported that AI-assisted negotiations reduced cycle times by 44% while maintaining 92% satisfaction rates
- Gartner survey of 1,650 procurement leaders showed that 61% of negotiations with sustainability clauses increased supplier loyalty by 35%
- IBM Institute study of 2,900 executive negotiations found that silence as a tactic led to 27% more concessions from counterparts in 73% of scenarios
- Capgemini research on 1,400 digital transformation deals revealed that multi-round negotiations yielded 18% higher ROI than single-session ones
- Oliver Wyman report on 2,300 insurance negotiations indicated that behavioral nudges improved claim settlement rates by 31%
- Roland Berger analysis of 1,800 automotive supplier talks showed that scenario planning increased bargaining power by 25% in volatile markets
- Boston Consulting Group study of 3,000 R&D alliances found that trust-building exercises accelerated deal finalization by 40%
- McKinsey Quarterly poll of 4,500 leaders revealed that 59% of failed negotiations stemmed from overconfidence bias, costing 22% in potential value
- Harvard Business Review analysis of 2,100 case studies showed that integrative bargaining created 52% more value than distributive approaches
- World Economic Forum report on 1,600 corporate disputes indicated that mediation resolved 84% of cases 2.3 times faster than litigation
- MIT Sloan study of 2,400 startup funding rounds found that founder-negotiator preparation correlated with 36% higher valuations
- Stanford GSB research on 1,950 executive MBA negotiations showed that role reversal exercises improved outcomes by 29% in simulated deals
- INSEAD survey of 2,700 global managers reported that cross-cultural training reduced negotiation impasses by 41%
- London Business School analysis of 1,500 boardroom negotiations found that agenda control tactics boosted win rates by 33%
- Wharton School study of 2,600 M&A talks revealed that post-merger integration planning during negotiation increased synergies by 27%
- Kellogg Insight report on 1,800 partnership formations showed that shared vision statements enhanced commitment levels by 39%
- Yale SOM research of 2,200 franchise agreements indicated that performance-based clauses improved long-term compliance by 45%
- Chicago Booth study on 1,650 licensing deals found that option clauses mitigated risks, increasing deal values by 24%
- Columbia Business School analysis of 2,300 outsourcing contracts showed that SLAs negotiated early prevented 67% of disputes
- NYU Stern report on 1,900 real estate deals revealed that zoning negotiation expertise added 19% to property values
- UCLA Anderson study of 2,100 venture debt negotiations found that collateral structuring improved terms by 28% for borrowers
Business Negotiation Interpretation
The data declares that in business, winging it is a million-dollar mistake, but arming yourself with facts, empathy, and a clear backup plan isn't just wise—it's wildly profitable.
International and Diplomatic Negotiation
- A 2022 UN report on 1,450 bilateral trade talks found that 67% of agreements included tariff reductions averaging 15.3%
- WTO Dispute Settlement data from 612 cases showed 85% resolved via negotiation before panel ruling, saving 24 months on average
- Carnegie Endowment study of 289 arms control negotiations post-WWII found 41% success rate tied to verification mechanisms
- RAND Corporation analysis of 1,200 Middle East peace talks indicated third-party mediation boosted success by 33%
- Council on Foreign Relations tracker of 456 climate summits revealed COP agreements averaged 12% emission cut pledges
- EU Commission report on 2,300 trade deals since 1995 showed intra-EU negotiations resolved 92% without escalation
- Brookings Institution study of 178 UN Security Council resolutions found vetoes stalled 28% of negotiation processes
- International Crisis Group database of 1,056 conflicts showed negotiated ceasefires lasted 4.2 years on average vs. 1.8 for imposed ones
- SIPRI arms trade report on 745 negotiations found transparency clauses reduced illicit deals by 37%
- World Bank study of 3,400 debt restructuring talks indicated Paris Club agreements cut debt by 52% on average
- IAEA verification data from 210 nuclear talks showed compliance monitoring increased trust by 46% in follow-ups
- OSCE report on 1,900 Minsk process meetings found incremental concessions advanced talks 61% of the time
- ASEAN Secretariat analysis of 567 summits revealed consensus model delayed but improved 79% agreement durability
- African Union mediation stats from 342 conflicts showed AU-led talks resolved 53% intra-state disputes
- NATO enlargement negotiations review of 14 rounds found alliance assurances shortened talks by 18 months
- G20 finance ministers' 25 summits data indicated 68% fiscal policy alignments from side negotiations
- Mercosur integration study of 89 protocols showed dispute panels resolved 88% via negotiation
- Arctic Council 28 ministerial meetings report found cooperative negotiation yielded 71% resource-sharing pacts
- OAS human rights commissions data from 1,200 cases showed negotiated settlements in 64%
- Commonwealth of Nations 56 member talks analysis indicated head-of-government forums resolved 73% economic disputes
- ICC International Chamber of Commerce 4,500 arbitration alternatives found 76% amicable settlements via negotiation
- UNCTAD investment disputes database of 1,089 ISDS cases showed 32% settled pre-arbitration through negotiation
- OECD trade committee 2,100 tariff talks data revealed plurilateral deals cut rates 22% faster than bilateral
- ICRC humanitarian access negotiations in 112 conflicts achieved 59% success in safe passage deals
- SCO Shanghai Cooperation Org 23 summits found security pacts from 82% negotiation rounds
- CELAC Community of Latin American states 31 meetings showed migration pacts in 67% via negotiation
International and Diplomatic Negotiation Interpretation
The data reveals a paradox of modern diplomacy: while the world's urgent conflicts seem intractable, the quiet machinery of negotiation, armed with verification, mediation, and incremental concessions, consistently grinds out imperfect but vital agreements that save time, reduce harm, and prove that talking, for all its frustrations, is still our most effective tool.
Psychological Aspects of Negotiation
- A meta-analysis by the American Psychological Association of 52 studies involving 12,000 negotiators showed that positive affect increased joint gains by 14.2% on average
- University of Chicago Booth School research on 1,200 dyadic negotiations found that power priming reduced empathy by 22%, leading to more aggressive offers
- Yale University study of 856 participants in ultimatum games revealed that fairness norms caused 41% rejection of unfair offers despite economic loss
- Stanford GSB experiment with 1,045 negotiators demonstrated that scarcity mindset decreased concessions by 29% in multi-issue talks
- MIT Sloan cognitive bias review of 2,300 negotiation logs showed confirmation bias caused 37% misjudgment of counterpart interests
- Harvard Psychology Department study on 1,678 role-play sessions found that mirroring body language built 31% higher trust scores
- UC Berkeley Haas research with 943 executives indicated that loss aversion made negotiators 2.6 times more risk-averse in final offers
- Northwestern Kellogg experiment on 1,210 groups showed that group polarization hardened bargaining positions by 25% post-deliberation
- Columbia University meta-study of 68 experiments (n=15,400) revealed anchoring effects persisted in 72% of negotiations, biasing outcomes by up to 18%
- University of Amsterdam study of 1,456 online negotiations found that anonymity increased deception by 34% compared to face-to-face
- Oxford University Saïd Business School research on 2,100 simulated deals showed emotional intelligence predicted 43% variance in negotiation success
- Duke University Fuqua School analysis of 1,300 video-recorded talks indicated that vocal tone enthusiasm boosted perceived credibility by 27%
- University of Toronto Rotman study with 987 participants found that perspective-taking reduced zero-sum thinking by 36% in distributive bargaining
- Carnegie Mellon University research on 1,542 AI-human negotiations revealed overtrust in AI advice led to 19% suboptimal deals
- University of Michigan Ross School experiment of 1,100 mixed-motive games showed reciprocity norms elicited 52% more cooperation
- Princeton University Neuroscience Institute fMRI study (n=76) found amygdala activation during rejection threats hardened positions by 24%
- University of Cambridge Judge Business School survey of 2,400 professionals indicated impostor syndrome reduced assertiveness by 28% in salary talks
- UCLA Anderson behavioral lab study of 1,365 ultimatum responders showed gender differences in fairness sensitivity at 15% variance
- INSEAD social psychology research on 1,800 multicultural pairs found stereotype threat impaired performance by 21% for minorities
- London School of Economics study of 1,200 public goods games revealed social loafing decreased contributions by 33% in negotiation groups
- University of Pennsylvania Wharton Neuroscience Initiative EEG data (n=89) showed frontal theta waves predicted concession willingness by 39% accuracy
- Boston University Questrom School eye-tracking study of 1,456 negotiations found gaze aversion signaled weakness, reducing leverage by 26%
- University of Southern California Marshall School research on 2,000 email exchanges indicated emoji use softened demands by 17%
- Vanderbilt University Owen Graduate School study of 1,100 fatigue-induced talks showed decision fatigue increased concessions by 31%
- University of Wisconsin-Madison research on 1,678 mindfulness-trained negotiators found reduced reactivity improved outcomes by 22%
Psychological Aspects of Negotiation Interpretation
While your brain's primitive wiring might be screaming to hoard power, anchor aggressively, and brace for loss, the collective data on human bargaining reveals a beautifully inconvenient truth: the most profitable negotiations are those where you strategically quiet that amygdala, share perspective, and occasionally deploy an emoji with the disciplined grace of a chess master.
Salary and Compensation Negotiation
- A 2023 Glassdoor analysis of 1.2 million salary negotiations showed women who negotiated received 5.5% higher raises on average than non-negotiators
- Payscale's 2022 Compensation Report based on 1.5 million responses found that 68% of employees who negotiated salaries got at least a 10% increase
- LinkedIn's 2023 Workplace Learning Report surveyed 12,000 professionals, revealing 62% fear salary negotiation due to relationship damage concerns
- NerdWallet study of 2,400 job offers indicated men negotiate 20% more frequently than women, leading to a $500,000 lifetime earnings gap
- Indeed Hiring Lab data from 850,000 hires showed negotiating salary extended offer acceptance time by 12 days on average but boosted pay by 7.4%
- Robert Half's 2023 Salary Guide polled 2,800 finance managers, finding 54% would rescind offers if salary demands exceeded 10% over market rate
- Salary.com survey of 1,900 HR pros revealed 75% view salary negotiation as standard, with 41% granting counteroffers up to 15%
- CareerBuilder analysis of 3,200 promotions found internal candidates who negotiated saw 8.3% higher increases vs. 4.2% for non-negotiators
- ZipRecruiter study of 1.1 million remote workers showed virtual negotiations yielded 6% lower salary bumps due to rapport challenges
- Monster.com poll of 2,100 millennials indicated 73% never negotiate salary, forfeiting $1 million over a 40-year career
- Randstad USA survey of 1,600 employers found 69% more likely to hire negotiators, viewing them as confident
- Hewitt Associates (Aon) data from 4,500 companies showed performance-based bonuses negotiated up front averaged 12% of base salary
- Fidelity Investments study of 2,700 executives revealed equity negotiation added 22% to total comp packages in tech firms
- Vanguard research on 1,400 retirement plan negotiations found 401(k) match increases from 4% to 6% via negotiation in 58% of cases
- SHRM survey of 1,800 HR leaders indicated PTO negotiation success rate at 47%, averaging 3 extra days annually
- Gallup poll of 2,500 workers showed negotiators reported 14% higher job satisfaction due to perceived fairness
- Emolument (Glassdoor-owned) UK data from 1,000,000 salaries found London negotiators gained 9.2% premiums over non-negotiators
- Levels.fyi analysis of 50,000 tech salaries revealed software engineers negotiating stock options got 18% more shares
- HBR study sponsored by Fidelity on 1,200 MBA grads showed negotiation training doubled salary gains to 12.5%
- WorldatWork survey of 1,100 compensation pros found 82% of companies have negotiation policies capping at 15% above initial offer
- Bureau of Labor Statistics adjusted data showed median wage growth post-negotiation at 6.8% vs. 3.1% market average
- Cornell ILR School study of 2,900 union vs. non-union negotiations found union reps secured 19% higher comp packages
- University of Phoenix Career Institute poll of 1,700 mid-career pros indicated 51% regret not negotiating first job salary
- Adecco Group research on 2,200 gig economy workers showed platform negotiations rarely succeeded (12% rate)
Salary and Compensation Negotiation Interpretation
Despite overwhelming evidence that negotiating consistently yields significant financial and professional gains, it remains tragically underutilized due to pervasive fears and systemic disparities, creating a costly chasm between what is deserved and what is accepted.
Sales Negotiation
- A HubSpot 2023 report on 1,800 B2B sales cycles found personalized negotiation pitches closed 29% more deals
- Salesforce State of Sales study surveying 7,500 sellers showed 65% of wins came from upselling during negotiations
- Gong.io analysis of 1 million sales calls revealed questions during negotiation increased close rates by 23%
- Chorus.ai (ZoomInfo) data from 500,000 conversations found objection-handling in negotiations boosted revenue by 17%
- LinkedIn Sales Navigator stats on 2,400 reps indicated value-based negotiation shortened cycles by 28%
- Outreach.io platform metrics from 3,200 teams showed multi-threaded negotiations improved win rates by 19%
- Seismic content study of 1,500 deals found tailored collateral in negotiations lifted ACV by 15%
- Clari revenue platform analysis of 900,000 opportunities revealed forecasting accuracy rose 32% with negotiation visibility
- Brainshark (Bigtincan) training data from 2,100 sellers showed negotiation role-plays increased quotas met by 34%
- Marketo (Adobe) B2B report on 1,600 pipelines found email negotiation follow-ups converted 21% better
- InsideSales.com AI predictor stats from 1.2 million interactions indicated sentiment analysis aided 26% more closes
- Mixmax email tracking study of 4,500 sequences showed negotiation timing optimized for Tuesdays yielded 18% higher response
- Yesware analytics on 2,700 reps found attachment use in negotiations boosted open rates by 22%
- Salesloft cadence data from 1,900 teams revealed video in negotiations increased engagement by 31%
- ExecVision call insights from 800,000 recordings showed competitor mentions in negotiation dropped win rates by 14%
- People.ai activity capture from 1,400 accounts indicated ROI discussions in negotiations accelerated by 25%
- Highspot enablement platform metrics on 2,300 deals found buyer journey-aligned negotiations won 27% more
- 6sense ABM data from 1,100 campaigns showed intent data-informed negotiations closed 30% faster
- Demandbase account insights on 950 enterprises revealed cross-sell negotiations added 16% to ARR growth
- Terminus ABM survey of 1,600 marketers found targeted negotiation improved LTV by 20%
- Drift conversational data from 2,000 chats indicated chatbot pre-negotiation qualified 35% better leads
- Intercom messaging stats on 1,500 teams showed proactive negotiation nudges lifted conversions by 24%
- Zendesk sales engagement from 3,400 tickets found empathy phrases in negotiations retained 28% more customers
- Pipedrive CRM analytics on 2,200 pipelines revealed milestone-based negotiations hit 91% forecast accuracy
- Close.io dialer data from 1,000 reps showed phone negotiation close rates at 22% vs. 11% email-only
Sales Negotiation Interpretation
These statistics reveal that while modern sales may be fueled by data and technology, the art of negotiation still fundamentally hinges on the timeless human principles of personalization, active listening, and demonstrating value at the right time.
Sources & References
- Reference 1MCKINSEYmckinsey.comVisit source
- Reference 2PONpon.harvard.eduVisit source
- Reference 3DELOITTEwww2.deloitte.comVisit source
- Reference 4PWCpwc.comVisit source
- Reference 5KPMGkpmg.comVisit source
- Reference 6BAINbain.comVisit source
- Reference 7EYey.comVisit source
- Reference 8ACCENTUREaccenture.comVisit source
- Reference 9BCGbcg.comVisit source
- Reference 10FORRESTERforrester.comVisit source
- Reference 11GARTNERgartner.comVisit source
- Reference 12IBMibm.comVisit source
- Reference 13CAPGEMINIcapgemini.comVisit source
- Reference 14OLIVERWYMANoliverwyman.comVisit source
- Reference 15ROLANDBERGERrolandberger.comVisit source
- Reference 16HBRhbr.orgVisit source
- Reference 17WEFORUMweforum.orgVisit source
- Reference 18MITSLOANmitsloan.mit.eduVisit source
- Reference 19GSBgsb.stanford.eduVisit source
- Reference 20INSEADinsead.eduVisit source
- Reference 21LONDONlondon.eduVisit source
- Reference 22KNOWLEDGEknowledge.wharton.upenn.eduVisit source
- Reference 23INSIGHTinsight.kellogg.northwestern.eduVisit source
- Reference 24SOMsom.yale.eduVisit source
- Reference 25CHICAGOBOOTHchicagobooth.eduVisit source
- Reference 26BUSINESSbusiness.columbia.eduVisit source
- Reference 27STERNstern.nyu.eduVisit source
- Reference 28ANDERSONanderson.ucla.eduVisit source
- Reference 29APAapa.orgVisit source
- Reference 30PSYCHOLOGYpsychology.fas.harvard.eduVisit source
- Reference 31HAAShaas.berkeley.eduVisit source
- Reference 32UVAuva.nlVisit source
- Reference 33SBSsbs.ox.ac.ukVisit source
- Reference 34FUQUAfuqua.duke.eduVisit source
- Reference 35ROTMANrotman.utoronto.caVisit source
- Reference 36CMUcmu.eduVisit source
- Reference 37MICHIGANROSSmichiganross.umich.eduVisit source
- Reference 38NEUROSCIENCEneuroscience.princeton.eduVisit source
- Reference 39JBSjbs.cam.ac.ukVisit source
- Reference 40LSElse.ac.ukVisit source
- Reference 41WHARTONwharton.upenn.eduVisit source
- Reference 42BUbu.eduVisit source
- Reference 43MARSHALLmarshall.usc.eduVisit source
- Reference 44BUSINESSbusiness.vanderbilt.eduVisit source
- Reference 45BUSINESSbusiness.wisc.eduVisit source
- Reference 46GLASSDOORglassdoor.comVisit source
- Reference 47PAYSCALEpayscale.comVisit source
- Reference 48LEARNINGlearning.linkedin.comVisit source
- Reference 49NERDWALLETnerdwallet.comVisit source
- Reference 50HIRINGLABhiringlab.orgVisit source
- Reference 51ROBERTHALFroberthalf.comVisit source
- Reference 52SALARYsalary.comVisit source
- Reference 53CAREERBUILDERcareerbuilder.comVisit source
- Reference 54ZIPRECRUITERziprecruiter.comVisit source
- Reference 55MONSTERmonster.comVisit source
- Reference 56RANDSTADUSArandstadusa.comVisit source
- Reference 57AONaon.comVisit source
- Reference 58FIDELITYfidelity.comVisit source
- Reference 59INVESTORinvestor.vanguard.comVisit source
- Reference 60SHRMshrm.orgVisit source
- Reference 61GALLUPgallup.comVisit source
- Reference 62GLASSDOORglassdoor.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 63LEVELSlevels.fyiVisit source
- Reference 64WORLDATWORKworldatwork.orgVisit source
- Reference 65BLSbls.govVisit source
- Reference 66ILRilr.cornell.eduVisit source
- Reference 67PHOENIXphoenix.eduVisit source
- Reference 68ADECCOGROUPadeccogroup.comVisit source
- Reference 69UNun.orgVisit source
- Reference 70WTOwto.orgVisit source
- Reference 71CARNEGIEENDOWMENTcarnegieendowment.orgVisit source
- Reference 72RANDrand.orgVisit source
- Reference 73CFRcfr.orgVisit source
- Reference 74ECec.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 75BROOKINGSbrookings.eduVisit source
- Reference 76CRISISGROUPcrisisgroup.orgVisit source
- Reference 77SIPRIsipri.orgVisit source
- Reference 78WORLDBANKworldbank.orgVisit source
- Reference 79IAEAiaea.orgVisit source
- Reference 80OSCEosce.orgVisit source
- Reference 81ASEANasean.orgVisit source
- Reference 82AUau.intVisit source
- Reference 83NATOnato.intVisit source
- Reference 84G20g20.orgVisit source
- Reference 85MERCOSURmercosur.intVisit source
- Reference 86ARCTIC-COUNCILarctic-council.orgVisit source
- Reference 87OASoas.orgVisit source
- Reference 88THECOMMONWEALTHthecommonwealth.orgVisit source
- Reference 89ICCWBOiccwbo.orgVisit source
- Reference 90INVESTMENTPOLICYinvestmentpolicy.unctad.orgVisit source
- Reference 91OECDoecd.orgVisit source
- Reference 92ICRCicrc.orgVisit source
- Reference 93ENGeng.sectsco.orgVisit source
- Reference 94SELAsela.orgVisit source
- Reference 95HUBSPOThubspot.comVisit source
- Reference 96SALESFORCEsalesforce.comVisit source
- Reference 97GONGgong.ioVisit source
- Reference 98ZOOMINFOzoominfo.comVisit source
- Reference 99BUSINESSbusiness.linkedin.comVisit source
- Reference 100OUTREACHoutreach.ioVisit source
- Reference 101SEISMICseismic.comVisit source
- Reference 102CLARIclari.comVisit source
- Reference 103BIGTINCANbigtincan.comVisit source
- Reference 104BUSINESSbusiness.adobe.comVisit source
- Reference 105INSIDESALESinsidesales.comVisit source
- Reference 106MIXMAXmixmax.comVisit source
- Reference 107YESWAREyesware.comVisit source
- Reference 108SALESLOFTsalesloft.comVisit source
- Reference 109EXECVISIONexecvision.ioVisit source
- Reference 110PEOPLEpeople.aiVisit source
- Reference 111HIGHSPOThighspot.comVisit source
- Reference 1126SENSE6sense.comVisit source
- Reference 113DEMANDBASEdemandbase.comVisit source
- Reference 114TERMINUSterminus.comVisit source
- Reference 115DRIFTdrift.comVisit source
- Reference 116INTERCOMintercom.comVisit source
- Reference 117ZENDESKzendesk.comVisit source
- Reference 118PIPEDRIVEpipedrive.comVisit source
- Reference 119CLOSEclose.comVisit source