GITNUXREPORT 2025

Insanity Plea Statistics

Insanity plea success remains rare, involving mental illness, high legal standards.

Jannik Linder

Co-Founder of Gitnux, specialized in content and tech since 2016.

First published: April 29, 2025

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking • Reputable sources • Regular updatesLearn more

Statistic 1

Studies indicate that males are more likely to used the insanity defense than females, representing about 75% of such cases

Statistic 2

The average age of defendants who plead insanity is generally in the mid-30s, with some variation based on jurisdiction

Statistic 3

The insanity plea is more commonly used in urban areas than rural areas, suggesting access to mental health professionals influences its use

Statistic 4

In the U.S., women account for about 15-20% of insanity plea cases, indicating a gender difference in the use of this defense

Statistic 5

Media coverage of insanity plea cases tends to influence public perception, often emphasizing sensational cases over statistical realities

Statistic 6

There is evidence that certain demographic factors, like age and socioeconomic status, can influence the likelihood of asserting an insanity plea, though data is limited

Statistic 7

Legal standards for insanity defenses vary by state, with some using the M’Naghten Rule, others the Model Penal Code, and some the Durham Rule

Statistic 8

The average duration of hospitalization for those found not guilty by reason of insanity is approximately 3 to 5 years

Statistic 9

The legal criteria for insanity often require that the defendant did not understand the nature of their act or did not know it was wrong at the time of the offense

Statistic 10

The use of the insanity plea in U.S. federal courts is relatively rare, accounting for less than 1% of all criminal cases

Statistic 11

Jurisdictions that follow the M’Naghten rule tend to have higher rates of guilty verdicts after insanity pleas compared to those using the Model Penal Code standards

Statistic 12

In the U.S., about 2-3% of felony defendants attempt an insanity plea in their cases

Statistic 13

The largest share of insanity plea cases are in the categories of homicide and serious assault, comprising over 50% of such defenses

Statistic 14

State insanity statutes differ significantly, with some states imposing more stringent criteria than others, impacting the likelihood of insanity defenses succeeding

Statistic 15

Experts estimate that around 4-5% of prison populations in the U.S. are made up of individuals who have used insanity defenses and subsequently committed crimes while institutionalized

Statistic 16

The rate of successful insanity defenses has decreased slightly over the past few decades, possibly due to more rigorous evaluations and standards

Statistic 17

One reason insanity pleas are rarely successful is because prosecutors often dispute the defendant’s mental health claims, leading to increased legal hurdles

Statistic 18

The application of the M’Naghten rule in insanity cases has been criticized for being too narrow and not reflecting modern understandings of mental illness

Statistic 19

During the past decade, there has been a slight decline in the use of insanity defenses, possibly due to legal reforms and increased skepticism

Statistic 20

Some jurisdictions have abolished the insanity defense altogether, replacing it with alternative measures such as diminished capacity or mental health discounts

Statistic 21

The rate of wrongful commitments of individuals who are later found sane is a concern in insanity defense proceedings, leading to calls for reform

Statistic 22

Historically, the insanity defense has been controversial, with some viewing it as a vital protection for the mentally ill and others as a loophole for criminals

Statistic 23

Critics argue that the insanity plea undermines justice and public safety, leading to ongoing debates and legislative efforts to restrict or abolish the defense

Statistic 24

The use of insanity pleas is higher among defendants charged with violent crimes compared to non-violent crimes, with some jurisdictions reporting over 30% of insanity defenses filed in homicide cases

Statistic 25

In some states, defendants can be committed for an indefinite period if found not guilty by reason of insanity, raising questions about civil commitment laws

Statistic 26

Over the last 50 years, legislative reforms in various states have been aimed at making insanity defenses more restrictive or abolishing them altogether, reflecting changing societal attitudes

Statistic 27

The use of technology, such as brain imaging, is increasingly discussed as a way to evaluate mental competency, potentially impacting future insanity defenses

Statistic 28

The median time from arrest to verdict in insanity plea cases can extend over 6 months due to extensive evaluations

Statistic 29

The success rate of insanity pleas in federal courts is higher than in state courts, partly due to differing standards and evaluation procedures

Statistic 30

About 20-25% of insanity plead cases involve individuals with pre-existing mental health diagnoses such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder

Statistic 31

The mental health evaluation process in insanity cases often involves multiple expert assessments to determine the defendant’s mental state

Statistic 32

Insanity pleas are typically associated with defendants who have a documented history of mental illness, yet many defendants with mental health issues do not pursue this defense

Statistic 33

In a study, about 80% of insanity plea cases involve defendants diagnosed with psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia

Statistic 34

The average cost of a lengthy mental health evaluation in an insanity case can range between $5,000 and $20,000

Statistic 35

Many defendants who use the insanity plea are detained indefinitely in mental health institutions if found not guilty, often for many years

Statistic 36

Notable cases using insanity pleas, like John Hinckley Jr. and Andrea Yates, have influenced public opinion about the defense, often with mixed reactions

Statistic 37

The use of forensic psychologists and psychiatrists is critical in insanity cases, often with multiple expert opinions needed, increasing costs and complexity

Statistic 38

There is a growing trend toward using assessments based on the American Law Institute's criteria, which focus on the defendant’s capacity at the time of the crime

Statistic 39

The majority of insanity defense cases involve defendants with prior psychiatric treatment, though many do not have a recent mental health record at the time of trial

Statistic 40

The rate of psychiatric diagnoses among insanity plea defendants is consistently high, with estimates suggesting over 70% diagnosed with at least one psychotic or mood disorder

Statistic 41

The criminal justice system faces challenges in accurately assessing mental state, necessitating highly specialized training for evaluators, often leading to variability in findings

Statistic 42

Public opinion polls show that roughly 70% of Americans believe the insanity defense is overused or misused

Statistic 43

Approximately 1% of felony defendants in the U.S. are found not guilty by reason of insanity each year

Statistic 44

The success rate for insanity defenses in criminal cases is about 26%

Statistic 45

In the United States, about 26% of insanity defenses result in a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity

Statistic 46

The majority of insanity pleas are dropped or result in convictions, with only around 1-2% leading to not guilty verdicts

Statistic 47

In several high-profile cases, defendants have used the insanity plea and received verdicts of not guilty by reason of insanity, often sparking public debate

Slide 1 of 47

Sources

Our Reports have been cited by:

Trust Badges - Publications that have cited our reports

Key Highlights

Approximately 1% of felony defendants in the U.S. are found not guilty by reason of insanity each year
The success rate for insanity defenses in criminal cases is about 26%
In the United States, about 26% of insanity defenses result in a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity
The majority of insanity pleas are dropped or result in convictions, with only around 1-2% leading to not guilty verdicts
Legal standards for insanity defenses vary by state, with some using the M’Naghten Rule, others the Model Penal Code, and some the Durham Rule
The average duration of hospitalization for those found not guilty by reason of insanity is approximately 3 to 5 years
About 20-25% of insanity plead cases involve individuals with pre-existing mental health diagnoses such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
The legal criteria for insanity often require that the defendant did not understand the nature of their act or did not know it was wrong at the time of the offense
In several high-profile cases, defendants have used the insanity plea and received verdicts of not guilty by reason of insanity, often sparking public debate
Studies indicate that males are more likely to used the insanity defense than females, representing about 75% of such cases
The mental health evaluation process in insanity cases often involves multiple expert assessments to determine the defendant’s mental state
The use of the insanity plea in U.S. federal courts is relatively rare, accounting for less than 1% of all criminal cases
Jurisdictions that follow the M’Naghten rule tend to have higher rates of guilty verdicts after insanity pleas compared to those using the Model Penal Code standards

Despite accounting for less than 1% of felony cases in the U.S., the insanity plea remains one of the most controversial and complex strategies in criminal defense, with success rates hovering around 26% and public debates fueled by high-profile cases and evolving legal standards.

Demographics and Public Perception

Studies indicate that males are more likely to used the insanity defense than females, representing about 75% of such cases
The average age of defendants who plead insanity is generally in the mid-30s, with some variation based on jurisdiction
The insanity plea is more commonly used in urban areas than rural areas, suggesting access to mental health professionals influences its use
In the U.S., women account for about 15-20% of insanity plea cases, indicating a gender difference in the use of this defense
Media coverage of insanity plea cases tends to influence public perception, often emphasizing sensational cases over statistical realities
There is evidence that certain demographic factors, like age and socioeconomic status, can influence the likelihood of asserting an insanity plea, though data is limited

Demographics and Public Perception Interpretation

While men in their mid-30s in urban areas are statistically more inclined to invoke the insanity defense—perhaps reflecting both mental health access and societal perceptions—public fascination with sensational cases continues to distort understanding of these complex legal and psychological realities.

Legal Standards and Procedures

Legal standards for insanity defenses vary by state, with some using the M’Naghten Rule, others the Model Penal Code, and some the Durham Rule
The average duration of hospitalization for those found not guilty by reason of insanity is approximately 3 to 5 years
The legal criteria for insanity often require that the defendant did not understand the nature of their act or did not know it was wrong at the time of the offense
The use of the insanity plea in U.S. federal courts is relatively rare, accounting for less than 1% of all criminal cases
Jurisdictions that follow the M’Naghten rule tend to have higher rates of guilty verdicts after insanity pleas compared to those using the Model Penal Code standards
In the U.S., about 2-3% of felony defendants attempt an insanity plea in their cases
The largest share of insanity plea cases are in the categories of homicide and serious assault, comprising over 50% of such defenses
State insanity statutes differ significantly, with some states imposing more stringent criteria than others, impacting the likelihood of insanity defenses succeeding
Experts estimate that around 4-5% of prison populations in the U.S. are made up of individuals who have used insanity defenses and subsequently committed crimes while institutionalized
The rate of successful insanity defenses has decreased slightly over the past few decades, possibly due to more rigorous evaluations and standards
One reason insanity pleas are rarely successful is because prosecutors often dispute the defendant’s mental health claims, leading to increased legal hurdles
The application of the M’Naghten rule in insanity cases has been criticized for being too narrow and not reflecting modern understandings of mental illness
During the past decade, there has been a slight decline in the use of insanity defenses, possibly due to legal reforms and increased skepticism
Some jurisdictions have abolished the insanity defense altogether, replacing it with alternative measures such as diminished capacity or mental health discounts
The rate of wrongful commitments of individuals who are later found sane is a concern in insanity defense proceedings, leading to calls for reform
Historically, the insanity defense has been controversial, with some viewing it as a vital protection for the mentally ill and others as a loophole for criminals
Critics argue that the insanity plea undermines justice and public safety, leading to ongoing debates and legislative efforts to restrict or abolish the defense
The use of insanity pleas is higher among defendants charged with violent crimes compared to non-violent crimes, with some jurisdictions reporting over 30% of insanity defenses filed in homicide cases
In some states, defendants can be committed for an indefinite period if found not guilty by reason of insanity, raising questions about civil commitment laws
Over the last 50 years, legislative reforms in various states have been aimed at making insanity defenses more restrictive or abolishing them altogether, reflecting changing societal attitudes
The use of technology, such as brain imaging, is increasingly discussed as a way to evaluate mental competency, potentially impacting future insanity defenses

Legal Standards and Procedures Interpretation

Insanity pleas remain a rare and complex legal gambit—significantly more often contested than accepted—highlighting the ongoing tension between protecting the mentally ill and safeguarding public safety amid evolving standards, technological advances, and societal skepticism.

Legal and Judicial Variations

The median time from arrest to verdict in insanity plea cases can extend over 6 months due to extensive evaluations
The success rate of insanity pleas in federal courts is higher than in state courts, partly due to differing standards and evaluation procedures

Legal and Judicial Variations Interpretation

With median delays exceeding six months due to thorough evaluations, and a higher success rate in federal courts—likely reflecting stricter criteria—insanity pleas reveal both the meticulous nature of mental assessments and the nuanced federal-state judicial divide.

Mental Health Assessment and Impact

About 20-25% of insanity plead cases involve individuals with pre-existing mental health diagnoses such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
The mental health evaluation process in insanity cases often involves multiple expert assessments to determine the defendant’s mental state
Insanity pleas are typically associated with defendants who have a documented history of mental illness, yet many defendants with mental health issues do not pursue this defense
In a study, about 80% of insanity plea cases involve defendants diagnosed with psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia
The average cost of a lengthy mental health evaluation in an insanity case can range between $5,000 and $20,000
Many defendants who use the insanity plea are detained indefinitely in mental health institutions if found not guilty, often for many years
Notable cases using insanity pleas, like John Hinckley Jr. and Andrea Yates, have influenced public opinion about the defense, often with mixed reactions
The use of forensic psychologists and psychiatrists is critical in insanity cases, often with multiple expert opinions needed, increasing costs and complexity
There is a growing trend toward using assessments based on the American Law Institute's criteria, which focus on the defendant’s capacity at the time of the crime
The majority of insanity defense cases involve defendants with prior psychiatric treatment, though many do not have a recent mental health record at the time of trial
The rate of psychiatric diagnoses among insanity plea defendants is consistently high, with estimates suggesting over 70% diagnosed with at least one psychotic or mood disorder
The criminal justice system faces challenges in accurately assessing mental state, necessitating highly specialized training for evaluators, often leading to variability in findings

Mental Health Assessment and Impact Interpretation

While roughly a quarter of insanity plea cases involve individuals with documented mental health diagnoses—primarily psychotic disorders—the complex, costly, and often controversial evaluation process underscores that justice's intersection with mental health remains as unpredictable as the mental states it seeks to understand.

Public Opinion

Public opinion polls show that roughly 70% of Americans believe the insanity defense is overused or misused

Public Opinion Interpretation

While the judicial system might consider the insanity defense a vital safeguard, the fact that 70% of Americans see it as overused or misused suggests we’re collectively questioning whether some defendants are truly nutty or just good at pretending to be.

Success Rates and Case Outcomes

Approximately 1% of felony defendants in the U.S. are found not guilty by reason of insanity each year
The success rate for insanity defenses in criminal cases is about 26%
In the United States, about 26% of insanity defenses result in a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity
The majority of insanity pleas are dropped or result in convictions, with only around 1-2% leading to not guilty verdicts
In several high-profile cases, defendants have used the insanity plea and received verdicts of not guilty by reason of insanity, often sparking public debate

Success Rates and Case Outcomes Interpretation

While roughly 1% of felony defendants in the U.S. claim insanity and about a quarter of these defenses lead to acquittal, the rarity and controversy surrounding successful insanity pleas highlight the delicate balance between justice and mental health in the courtroom.