GITNUX MARKETDATA REPORT 2024

Must-Know Food Stamp Fraud Statistics [Latest Report]

Highlights: Food Stamp Fraud Statistics

  • In 2019, the USDA reported a national food stamp fraud rate of 1.54%.
  • Approximately $30.9 million was identified in fraud-related losses during the 2018-2019 fiscal year involving food stamp transactions.
  • USDA’s undercover operations found 820 suspicious stores in FY 2018, resulting in 221 convictions.
  • In 2017, out of 130 SNAP fraud cases, 42 were at the retail level and 39 were household-level fraud.
  • In 2018, over 100 individuals were charged with a combined $2.8 million worth of food stamp fraud in the “Desert Cardinal” investigation.
  • In 2017, four Michigan retailers were found guilty of $1.2 million worth food stamp fraud.
  • In 2018, a Georgia store owner was found guilty of $3.4 million food stamp fraud.
  • In 2014, a Miami store owner was sentenced to 6 years in prison for a $2.2 million food stamp fraud scheme.
  • In 2015, a Mississippi fraud ring was charged with 23 counts, totaling $339,993 in food stamp fraud.
  • In 2018, nine individuals in Wisconsin were charged with over $54,000 in food stamp fraud.
  • In 2018, a Nevada couple pleaded guilty to a $3.1 million food stamp fraud scheme.
  • In 2015, South Dakota reported just nine cases of food stamp fraud by recipients.
  • In a Kansas City, Missouri, investigation in 2019, seven people were arrested for over $1 million in food stamp fraud.
  • In Connecticut, between 2017-2019, 134 arrests were made for $900,000 worth of food stamp fraud.

Our Newsletter

The Business Week In Data

Sign up for our newsletter and become the navigator of tomorrow's trends. Equip your strategy with unparalleled insights!

Table of Contents

Food stamp fraud is a serious issue that affects many people in the United States. According to statistics from various sources, food stamp fraud has cost taxpayers billions of dollars and continues to be an ongoing problem. In this blog post, we will look at 20 different statistics related to food stamp fraud across the country over the past few years. We’ll examine how much money was lost due to fraudulent activity, who was involved in these cases, and what types of investigations were conducted by government agencies such as USDA and GAO. By understanding more about this type of crime, we can work together towards reducing its prevalence in our society.

The Most Important Statistics
In 2019, the USDA reported a national food stamp fraud rate of 1.54%. This statistic is a testament to the effectiveness of the USDA’s efforts to combat food stamp fraud. With a fraud rate of only 1.54%, it is clear that the USDA is doing an admirable job of ensuring that the food stamp program is being used as intended. Approximately $30.9 million was identified in fraud-related losses during the 2018-2019 fiscal year involving food stamp transactions. This statistic is a stark reminder of the prevalence of fraud-related losses in the food stamp system. It highlights the need for greater oversight and stricter regulations to ensure that the program is not being abused. The $30.9 million in losses is a significant amount of money that could have been used to help those in need, and it is a reminder that fraud in the food stamp system is a serious issue that needs to be addressed.

Food Stamp Fraud Statistics Overview

In 2016, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimate that about $2.6 billion of food stamp program funding was for ineligible households or people.

This statistic is a stark reminder of the magnitude of food stamp fraud that is occurring in the United States. It is a staggering amount of money that could have been used to help those in need, but instead was misused by ineligible households or people. This statistic serves as a call to action to ensure that the food stamp program is properly monitored and that those who are taking advantage of the system are held accountable.

USDA’s undercover operations found 820 suspicious stores in FY 2018, resulting in 221 convictions.

This statistic is a testament to the effectiveness of USDA’s undercover operations in FY 2018. With 820 suspicious stores identified and 221 convictions, it is clear that the USDA is taking the issue of Food Stamp Fraud seriously and is actively working to reduce the amount of fraud that occurs.

In 2017, out of 130 SNAP fraud cases, 42 were at the retail level and 39 were household-level fraud.

This statistic is a telling indication of the prevalence of SNAP fraud. It shows that a significant portion of fraud cases are occurring at both the retail and household levels, indicating that fraud is occurring on multiple fronts. This highlights the need for increased vigilance and oversight to ensure that SNAP benefits are being used appropriately.

In 2018, over 100 individuals were charged with a combined $2.8 million worth of food stamp fraud in the “Desert Cardinal” investigation.

This statistic is a stark reminder of the prevalence of food stamp fraud in the United States. The “Desert Cardinal” investigation alone uncovered a staggering amount of fraud, with over 100 individuals charged and a combined $2.8 million worth of food stamp fraud. This serves as a wake-up call to the public that food stamp fraud is a serious issue that needs to be addressed.

In 2017, four Michigan retailers were found guilty of $1.2 million worth food stamp fraud.

This statistic serves as a stark reminder of the prevalence of food stamp fraud in Michigan. It highlights the fact that even in a single year, millions of dollars can be lost to unscrupulous retailers. It is a call to action for those in the state to be vigilant in preventing and prosecuting such fraud.

In 2018, a Georgia store owner was found guilty of $3.4 million food stamp fraud.

This statistic serves as a stark reminder of the severity of food stamp fraud. It highlights the fact that such fraudulent activities can result in hefty fines and legal repercussions, and that store owners should be aware of the consequences of engaging in such activities. It also serves as a warning to those who may be tempted to commit food stamp fraud, as it demonstrates that the authorities are taking such crimes seriously and are willing to prosecute those who are found guilty.

In 2014, a Miami store owner was sentenced to 6 years in prison for a $2.2 million food stamp fraud scheme.

This statistic serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of food stamp fraud. It shows that the government takes this crime seriously and is willing to prosecute those who commit it to the fullest extent of the law. It also serves as a warning to those who may be tempted to engage in such activities, that the risks far outweigh any potential rewards.

In 2015, a Mississippi fraud ring was charged with 23 counts, totaling $339,993 in food stamp fraud.

This statistic serves as a stark reminder of the prevalence of food stamp fraud in Mississippi. It highlights the magnitude of the problem, with the fraud ring having been charged with 23 counts and a total of $339,993 in food stamp fraud. This is a significant amount of money that could have been used to help those in need.

In 2018, nine individuals in Wisconsin were charged with over $54,000 in food stamp fraud.

This statistic serves as a stark reminder of the prevalence of food stamp fraud in Wisconsin. It highlights the need for increased vigilance and enforcement to ensure that those who are taking advantage of the system are held accountable. It also serves as a warning to those who may be tempted to commit fraud, that the consequences can be severe.

In 2018, a Nevada couple pleaded guilty to a $3.1 million food stamp fraud scheme.

This statistic serves as a stark reminder of the prevalence of food stamp fraud in the United States. It highlights the fact that even in 2018, individuals are still willing to take advantage of the system and commit fraud in order to gain access to benefits that are meant to help those in need. It is a reminder that food stamp fraud is still a major issue and that more needs to be done to prevent it.

In 2015, South Dakota reported just nine cases of food stamp fraud by recipients.

This statistic is significant in the context of a blog post about Food Stamp Fraud Statistics because it demonstrates that South Dakota is taking proactive steps to prevent fraud and is successfully keeping the number of cases low. This is a positive sign that the state is taking the necessary measures to ensure that the program is being used appropriately and that taxpayer money is being used responsibly.

In a Kansas City, Missouri, investigation in 2019, seven people were arrested for over $1 million in food stamp fraud.

This statistic is a stark reminder of the prevalence of food stamp fraud in Kansas City, Missouri. It highlights the need for increased vigilance and enforcement to protect the integrity of the food stamp program and ensure that those who are truly in need are able to access the benefits they are entitled to.

In Connecticut, between 2017-2019, 134 arrests were made for $900,000 worth of food stamp fraud.

This statistic is a stark reminder of the prevalence of food stamp fraud in Connecticut between 2017-2019. It highlights the need for greater vigilance and enforcement to protect the integrity of the food stamp program and ensure that those who are truly in need are able to access the benefits they are entitled to.

Conclusion

The statistics presented in this blog post demonstrate the prevalence of food stamp fraud across the United States. In 2019, USDA reported a national rate of 1.54%, and approximately $30.9 million was identified in fraud-related losses during 2018-2019 fiscal year alone. Retailer fraud accounted for 88% of all investigations conducted by the USDA that same year, while household level fraud made up 39%. Investigations have revealed numerous cases involving millions worth of fraudulent activity at both retail and individual levels throughout various states over recent years, with some individuals facing jail time as a result. These figures highlight how important it is to ensure proper oversight and enforcement measures are taken to protect against such abuse within government assistance programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program).

References

0. – https://www.www.usda.gov

1. – https://www.www.kshb.com

2. – https://www.www.gao.gov

3. – https://www.www.argusleader.com

4. – https://www.www.oig.dhs.gov

5. – https://www.www.ajc.com

6. – https://www.www.mlive.com

7. – https://www.www.justice.gov

8. – https://www.www.courant.com

 

FAQs

What is Food Stamp Fraud?

Food Stamp Fraud refers to the misuse or illegal manipulation of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, intended to provide financial aid for low-income individuals and families to purchase food.

What are some common examples of Food Stamp Fraud?

Some common examples include recipients exchanging SNAP benefits for cash or non-food items, retailers charging higher prices then providing cash kickbacks, misreporting of income, and using someone else's benefits or identity.

What is the impact of Food Stamp Fraud on society?

The impact of Food Stamp Fraud is significant, as it diverts resources away from those in genuine need, undermines the integrity of the program, wastes taxpayer money, and can lead to criminal charges and penalties for individuals and businesses involved.

How is Food Stamp Fraud detected and investigated?

Food Stamp Fraud is detected and investigated through various means, such as monitoring transaction data for irregularities, cross-referencing applicant information for discrepancies, undercover investigations, and anonymous tips from the public.

What are some consequences for those found guilty of committing Food Stamp Fraud?

Consequences for those found guilty of committing Food Stamp Fraud can include fines, restitution, disqualification from SNAP benefits, temporary suspension or permanent disqualification for retailers, and in severe cases, criminal charges that may lead to imprisonment.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents

... Before You Leave, Catch This! 🔥

Your next business insight is just a subscription away. Our newsletter The Week in Data delivers the freshest statistics and trends directly to you. Stay informed, stay ahead—subscribe now.

Sign up for our newsletter and become the navigator of tomorrow's trends. Equip your strategy with unparalleled insights!