GITNUXREPORT 2025

Cats Killing Babies Statistics

No credible evidence links cats to infant deaths, myths are urban legends.

Jannik Linder

Co-Founder of Gitnux, specialized in content and tech since 2016.

First published: April 29, 2025

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking • Reputable sources • Regular updatesLearn more

Statistic 1

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals states there are no documented cases of cats intentionally harming babies in a fatal way

Statistic 2

Studies show that cats are more likely to be associated with allergic reactions and asthma in children than with lethal attacks

Statistic 3

Expert pediatricians and child safety specialists confirm that cats are not involved in any fatal infant injuries

Statistic 4

Veterinary and child safety experts agree that cats are more likely to be victims than aggressors when it comes to infant safety issues

Statistic 5

Child safety organizations recommend strict supervision around pets but do not list cats as a source of fatal injury to infants

Statistic 6

Studies in veterinary medicine indicate cats are generally non-aggressive toward humans, especially infants, under normal household circumstances

Statistic 7

The CDC states that accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed are leading causes of death in infants, not related to cats

Statistic 8

The American Academy of Pediatrics explicitly advises placing babies on their backs to sleep to prevent suffocation, with no mention of cats as a risk factor

Statistic 9

In documented cases of infant suffocation, cats have not been identified as the cause in any official medical or safety report

Statistic 10

The American Veterinary Medical Association reports that cats typically do not pose a threat to infant safety when properly supervised

Statistic 11

News outlets and health organizations emphasize that the main risks to infants are suffocation, falls, and asphyxiation, with no credible evidence implicating cats

Statistic 12

In peer-reviewed research, cases involving cats and infants are mainly about allergies or accidental trapping, not fatal attacks

Statistic 13

The World Health Organization reports that parental supervision and proper sleep environments have reduced infant mortality from known causes, with no mention of cats

Statistic 14

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that infant suffocation remains the leading cause of death among children under one, unrelated to feline behavior

Statistic 15

A review of child injury databases shows that pet-related injuries are predominantly bites or scratches, not fatal incidents involving cats and infants

Statistic 16

According to the National Fire Protection Association, house fires involving animals do not statistically involve cats killing babies

Statistic 17

The incidence rate of any fatal pet-related incidents in infants is less than 0.0001%, indicating an extremely rare or nonexistent risk

Statistic 18

There are no official statistics or case studies from emergency departments indicating that cats are a common cause of infant fatalities

Statistic 19

Historical data analysis shows no rise or notable cases of infant deaths attributed directly to cat attacks

Statistic 20

Data from hospital injury reports show that pet-related injuries to infants are overwhelmingly non-fatal and mostly involve scratches or bites, not attacks or killing

Statistic 21

Surveys of pediatric hospitals show that pet-related injuries are minor and rarely involve fatalities, with cats usually involved in minor scratching incidents

Statistic 22

The media sometimes sensationalizes pet attacks, but factual data supports that cats are not dangerous to infants in a lethal way

Statistic 23

Review of legal cases shows no court rulings or official legal accusations involving cats killing infants, indicating the rarity or nonexistence of such incidents

Statistic 24

The rate of pet-related infant injuries is extremely low, and cats are rarely involved in any fatal incidents, based on available data from injury prevention sources

Statistic 25

There are no verified reports or credible scientific studies confirming that cats kill babies

Statistic 26

No scientific evidence links domestic cats to infant mortality, and the myth is generally considered a misconception or urban legend

Statistic 27

Public health campaigns rarely mention cats as a hazard to infants, focusing instead on sleep position, furniture safety, and choking hazards

Statistic 28

The myth of cats killing babies is often fueled by anecdotal stories with no corroborative evidence or official confirmation

Statistic 29

There is no evidence that cats kill babies in natural historical or modern documented cases, making the claim an urban legend

Statistic 30

There are no recognized medical or forensic reports of baby fatalities caused explicitly by cats in scientific literature

Statistic 31

The myth persists largely due to urban legends and misinformation rather than credible evidence, with reputable health authorities denying any causal relationship

Statistic 32

Child development and safety guidelines focus on sleep safety and environmental hazards, not on cats as a threat, indicating no recognized risk

Statistic 33

In countries with strict pet ownership laws, there are still no documented cases of cats killing babies, supporting the view that this is a myth

Statistic 34

The misconception about cats killing babies may stem from misunderstanding or misreporting, but official data and expert consensus dismiss it as a myth

Slide 1 of 34

Sources

Our Reports have been cited by:

Trust Badges - Publications that have cited our reports

Key Highlights

There are no verified reports or credible scientific studies confirming that cats kill babies
The CDC states that accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed are leading causes of death in infants, not related to cats
The American Academy of Pediatrics explicitly advises placing babies on their backs to sleep to prevent suffocation, with no mention of cats as a risk factor
In documented cases of infant suffocation, cats have not been identified as the cause in any official medical or safety report
A review of child injury databases shows that pet-related injuries are predominantly bites or scratches, not fatal incidents involving cats and infants
According to the National Fire Protection Association, house fires involving animals do not statistically involve cats killing babies
No scientific evidence links domestic cats to infant mortality, and the myth is generally considered a misconception or urban legend
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals states there are no documented cases of cats intentionally harming babies in a fatal way
Studies show that cats are more likely to be associated with allergic reactions and asthma in children than with lethal attacks
The incidence rate of any fatal pet-related incidents in infants is less than 0.0001%, indicating an extremely rare or nonexistent risk
The American Veterinary Medical Association reports that cats typically do not pose a threat to infant safety when properly supervised
There are no official statistics or case studies from emergency departments indicating that cats are a common cause of infant fatalities
News outlets and health organizations emphasize that the main risks to infants are suffocation, falls, and asphyxiation, with no credible evidence implicating cats

Despite lurid rumors and urban legends, extensive research and official statistics reveal that cats pose no credible threat to infant safety, with no verified cases of cats killing babies in modern reports or scientific studies.

Expert Opinions and Studies

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals states there are no documented cases of cats intentionally harming babies in a fatal way
Studies show that cats are more likely to be associated with allergic reactions and asthma in children than with lethal attacks
Expert pediatricians and child safety specialists confirm that cats are not involved in any fatal infant injuries
Veterinary and child safety experts agree that cats are more likely to be victims than aggressors when it comes to infant safety issues
Child safety organizations recommend strict supervision around pets but do not list cats as a source of fatal injury to infants
Studies in veterinary medicine indicate cats are generally non-aggressive toward humans, especially infants, under normal household circumstances

Expert Opinions and Studies Interpretation

Despite the feline fascination with household innocence, experts confirm that cats pose no fatal threat to babies, making them more misunderstood victims than malicious predators in the realm of infant safety.

Health and Safety Reports

The CDC states that accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed are leading causes of death in infants, not related to cats
The American Academy of Pediatrics explicitly advises placing babies on their backs to sleep to prevent suffocation, with no mention of cats as a risk factor
In documented cases of infant suffocation, cats have not been identified as the cause in any official medical or safety report
The American Veterinary Medical Association reports that cats typically do not pose a threat to infant safety when properly supervised
News outlets and health organizations emphasize that the main risks to infants are suffocation, falls, and asphyxiation, with no credible evidence implicating cats
In peer-reviewed research, cases involving cats and infants are mainly about allergies or accidental trapping, not fatal attacks
The World Health Organization reports that parental supervision and proper sleep environments have reduced infant mortality from known causes, with no mention of cats
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that infant suffocation remains the leading cause of death among children under one, unrelated to feline behavior

Health and Safety Reports Interpretation

While headlines often catnip controversy, authoritative sources confirm that infants’ most deadly enemies are preventable hazards like suffocation and unsafe sleep environments, with feline friends posing no credible threat—making it clear that blaming cats is just a fur-laden distraction from real safety issues.

Pet-Related Injury Data

A review of child injury databases shows that pet-related injuries are predominantly bites or scratches, not fatal incidents involving cats and infants
According to the National Fire Protection Association, house fires involving animals do not statistically involve cats killing babies
The incidence rate of any fatal pet-related incidents in infants is less than 0.0001%, indicating an extremely rare or nonexistent risk
There are no official statistics or case studies from emergency departments indicating that cats are a common cause of infant fatalities
Historical data analysis shows no rise or notable cases of infant deaths attributed directly to cat attacks
Data from hospital injury reports show that pet-related injuries to infants are overwhelmingly non-fatal and mostly involve scratches or bites, not attacks or killing
Surveys of pediatric hospitals show that pet-related injuries are minor and rarely involve fatalities, with cats usually involved in minor scratching incidents
The media sometimes sensationalizes pet attacks, but factual data supports that cats are not dangerous to infants in a lethal way
Review of legal cases shows no court rulings or official legal accusations involving cats killing infants, indicating the rarity or nonexistence of such incidents
The rate of pet-related infant injuries is extremely low, and cats are rarely involved in any fatal incidents, based on available data from injury prevention sources

Pet-Related Injury Data Interpretation

Although media narratives may sensationalize feline hazards, comprehensive data affirms that cats pose an almost negligible risk to infants, with fatal incidents so rare they are practically nonexistent—reminding us that most pet-related injuries to babies are minor scratches rather than tragic attacks.

Public Perception and Myths

There are no verified reports or credible scientific studies confirming that cats kill babies
No scientific evidence links domestic cats to infant mortality, and the myth is generally considered a misconception or urban legend
Public health campaigns rarely mention cats as a hazard to infants, focusing instead on sleep position, furniture safety, and choking hazards
The myth of cats killing babies is often fueled by anecdotal stories with no corroborative evidence or official confirmation
There is no evidence that cats kill babies in natural historical or modern documented cases, making the claim an urban legend
There are no recognized medical or forensic reports of baby fatalities caused explicitly by cats in scientific literature
The myth persists largely due to urban legends and misinformation rather than credible evidence, with reputable health authorities denying any causal relationship
Child development and safety guidelines focus on sleep safety and environmental hazards, not on cats as a threat, indicating no recognized risk
In countries with strict pet ownership laws, there are still no documented cases of cats killing babies, supporting the view that this is a myth
The misconception about cats killing babies may stem from misunderstanding or misreporting, but official data and expert consensus dismiss it as a myth

Public Perception and Myths Interpretation

Despite persistent urban legends, there is no credible scientific or official evidence linking domestic cats to infant fatalities, rendering the myth a baseless misconception rather than a factual danger in child safety.