GITNUXREPORT 2025

Bonferroni Statistics

Bonferroni correction controls errors but is conservative and can reduce power.

Jannik Linder

Co-Founder of Gitnux, specialized in content and tech since 2016.

First published: April 29, 2025

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking • Reputable sources • Regular updatesLearn more

Statistic 1

In practice, the Bonferroni correction is considered conservative, especially when testing many hypotheses

Statistic 2

Despite being conservative, the Bonferroni correction remains popular for its simplicity and ease of use

Statistic 3

Bonferroni correction is optimal for independent tests but less so for dependent ones

Statistic 4

The Bonferroni correction can be overly strict in cases with many hypotheses, leading to reduced statistical power

Statistic 5

The Bonferroni correction can be overly conservative in the presence of dependence among tests, leading to reduced power for detecting true positives

Statistic 6

Bonferroni correction is considered a very conservative approach, which can be a disadvantage when testing many hypotheses

Statistic 7

The number of tests in a typical GWAS can range from hundreds of thousands to millions, highlighting the conservative nature of Bonferroni

Statistic 8

The effectiveness of Bonferroni correction diminishes as the number of hypotheses increases, due to its conservative nature

Statistic 9

In high-dimensional data analysis, Bonferroni adjustment can lead to very strict significance thresholds, sometimes missing true signals

Statistic 10

Researchers recommend using Bonferroni correction with caution, particularly when tests are correlated, and consider alternative methods when appropriate

Statistic 11

Bonferroni correction is less suited for exploratory research where missing true positives is more problematic than false positives

Statistic 12

In psychological research, Bonferroni adjustments are common when multiple comparisons are made, particularly in experimental designs

Statistic 13

The limitation of Bonferroni correction is its tendency to increase Type II errors, especially when many tests are conducted simultaneously

Statistic 14

Bonferroni correction can be computationally intensive in extremely large datasets, though modern software mitigates this issue

Statistic 15

In time-series analysis and other dependent data contexts, Bonferroni may be overly conservative, and alternative methods are suggested

Statistic 16

Some alternatives to Bonferroni include Holm-Bonferroni and Hochberg procedures

Statistic 17

The method has been extended to other statistical procedures beyond hypothesis testing, such as confidence intervals

Statistic 18

Bonferroni correction is widely used in genetic research to account for multiple comparisons

Statistic 19

It is used predominantly in biology, psychology, medicine, and other experimental sciences

Statistic 20

Bonferroni correction was first introduced in 1936 by Italian mathematician Carlo Emilio Bonferroni

Statistic 21

The name Bonferroni correction is derived from the Italian mathematician Carlo Emilio Bonferroni

Statistic 22

The correction is named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, who published his work in 1936

Statistic 23

Bonferroni's method is one of the earliest approaches to multiple testing correction and remains influential today

Statistic 24

The Bonferroni method is used to control the family-wise error rate (FWER) in multiple hypothesis testing

Statistic 25

Bonferroni correction adjusts the significance level by dividing it by the number of tests

Statistic 26

The Bonferroni method is applicable regardless of the correlation between tests

Statistic 27

The adjustment made by Bonferroni can lead to a high rate of false negatives when many tests are conducted

Statistic 28

Bonferroni adjustment is frequently used in clinical trials with multiple endpoints

Statistic 29

It is often considered a "safe" correction method because it ensures strong control of the Type I error rate

Statistic 30

In some fields, the Bonferroni correction is used as a benchmark against other methods for multiple testing correction

Statistic 31

statistics: Bonferroni correction is particularly useful in genetic association studies with high numbers of SNPs tested

Statistic 32

Bonferroni correction is often implemented in statistical software packages like R, SPSS, and SAS

Statistic 33

The Bonferroni method minimizes the probability of making at least one Type I error among multiple tests

Statistic 34

In some cases, researchers prefer less conservative methods such as false discovery rate (FDR) procedures over Bonferroni for large datasets

Statistic 35

The method is black and white in nature, controlling for Type I errors but increasing the chance of Type II errors

Statistic 36

Researchers often use Bonferroni correction in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), where thousands of tests are performed

Statistic 37

When applied to multiple comparisons, Bonferroni adjusts the p-value threshold to maintain a family-wise error rate of 0.05

Statistic 38

Adjusted p-values using Bonferroni are simply the original p-values multiplied by the number of tests, capped at 1

Statistic 39

Bonferroni correction is often used in meta-analyses to combine multiple study results while controlling for Type I error

Statistic 40

The Bonferroni method has been extended into adaptive procedures like the Holm-Bonferroni method to improve sensitivity

Statistic 41

The correction is particularly relevant in studies with a large number of simultaneous hypotheses, such as omics data

Statistic 42

Bonferroni’s principle is based on the union bound in probability theory, ensuring a conservative control of Type I error

Statistic 43

The correction works by multiplying the p-value by the number of comparisons to maintain a consistent overall error rate

Statistic 44

The simplicity of Bonferroni correction makes it a default choice in many statistical software packages

Statistic 45

The method is useful in confirmatory analyses where false positives need to be strictly controlled

Statistic 46

The correction has been criticized for being overly conservative, leading to missed discoveries in high-throughput experiments

Statistic 47

In bioinformatics, Bonferroni correction is often applied to control false positive rates in high-throughput sequencing data

Statistic 48

The family-wise error rate controlled by Bonferroni is the probability of making at least one Type I error among all tests

Statistic 49

The correction developed significantly influence statistical practices in multiple hypothesis testing, shaping subsequent methods and improvements

Statistic 50

The correction is often used in conjunction with other statistical adjustments in complex data analyses

Statistic 51

In experimental psychology, it is common to apply Bonferroni corrections when multiple post-hoc tests are conducted following ANOVA

Statistic 52

When dealing with multiple comparisons, Bonferroni correction provides a simple rule to maintain overall significance level, especially useful for small to moderate numbers of tests

Slide 1 of 52

Sources

Our Reports have been cited by:

Trust Badges - Publications that have cited our reports

Key Highlights

Bonferroni correction was first introduced in 1936 by Italian mathematician Carlo Emilio Bonferroni
The Bonferroni method is used to control the family-wise error rate (FWER) in multiple hypothesis testing
Bonferroni correction adjusts the significance level by dividing it by the number of tests
In practice, the Bonferroni correction is considered conservative, especially when testing many hypotheses
The Bonferroni method is applicable regardless of the correlation between tests
Bonferroni correction is widely used in genetic research to account for multiple comparisons
Despite being conservative, the Bonferroni correction remains popular for its simplicity and ease of use
The adjustment made by Bonferroni can lead to a high rate of false negatives when many tests are conducted
Bonferroni correction is optimal for independent tests but less so for dependent ones
Some alternatives to Bonferroni include Holm-Bonferroni and Hochberg procedures
The Bonferroni correction can be overly strict in cases with many hypotheses, leading to reduced statistical power
Bonferroni adjustment is frequently used in clinical trials with multiple endpoints
The name Bonferroni correction is derived from the Italian mathematician Carlo Emilio Bonferroni

Since its introduction in 1936, the Bonferroni correction has become a cornerstone in the realm of statistical testing—protecting researchers from false positives while sparking ongoing debates about its conservative nature and suitability for high-dimensional data.

Advantages and Limitations

In practice, the Bonferroni correction is considered conservative, especially when testing many hypotheses
Despite being conservative, the Bonferroni correction remains popular for its simplicity and ease of use
Bonferroni correction is optimal for independent tests but less so for dependent ones
The Bonferroni correction can be overly strict in cases with many hypotheses, leading to reduced statistical power
The Bonferroni correction can be overly conservative in the presence of dependence among tests, leading to reduced power for detecting true positives
Bonferroni correction is considered a very conservative approach, which can be a disadvantage when testing many hypotheses
The number of tests in a typical GWAS can range from hundreds of thousands to millions, highlighting the conservative nature of Bonferroni
The effectiveness of Bonferroni correction diminishes as the number of hypotheses increases, due to its conservative nature
In high-dimensional data analysis, Bonferroni adjustment can lead to very strict significance thresholds, sometimes missing true signals
Researchers recommend using Bonferroni correction with caution, particularly when tests are correlated, and consider alternative methods when appropriate
Bonferroni correction is less suited for exploratory research where missing true positives is more problematic than false positives
In psychological research, Bonferroni adjustments are common when multiple comparisons are made, particularly in experimental designs
The limitation of Bonferroni correction is its tendency to increase Type II errors, especially when many tests are conducted simultaneously
Bonferroni correction can be computationally intensive in extremely large datasets, though modern software mitigates this issue
In time-series analysis and other dependent data contexts, Bonferroni may be overly conservative, and alternative methods are suggested

Advantages and Limitations Interpretation

While the Bonferroni correction’s straightforwardness makes it a trusty sidekick in controlling false positives, its conservativeness often turns it into a cautious friend who might inadvertently sweep away true discoveries, especially as the number of hypotheses grows or the tests become interdependent.

Alternatives and Extensions

Some alternatives to Bonferroni include Holm-Bonferroni and Hochberg procedures
The method has been extended to other statistical procedures beyond hypothesis testing, such as confidence intervals

Alternatives and Extensions Interpretation

While Bonferroni’s straightforward approach offers a reliable guardrail against false positives, modern alternatives like Holm-Bonferroni and Hochberg procedures, along with its extensions to confidence intervals, remind us that in statistics, as in life, sometimes smarter, more nuanced strategies outperform blunt instruments.

Applications and Fields of Use

Bonferroni correction is widely used in genetic research to account for multiple comparisons
It is used predominantly in biology, psychology, medicine, and other experimental sciences

Applications and Fields of Use Interpretation

While the Bonferroni correction may sound like a witty name, it’s actually a serious statistical tool that guards against false positives by adjusting for the multitude of comparisons in genetics, psychology, medicine, and beyond.

Historical Background and Origin

Bonferroni correction was first introduced in 1936 by Italian mathematician Carlo Emilio Bonferroni
The name Bonferroni correction is derived from the Italian mathematician Carlo Emilio Bonferroni
The correction is named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, who published his work in 1936
Bonferroni's method is one of the earliest approaches to multiple testing correction and remains influential today

Historical Background and Origin Interpretation

Named after the pioneering Italian mathematician Carlo Emilio Bonferroni in 1936, this correction method humorously reminds us that even in statistics, a little extra stringency can prevent a lot of false positives.

Methodology and Principles

The Bonferroni method is used to control the family-wise error rate (FWER) in multiple hypothesis testing
Bonferroni correction adjusts the significance level by dividing it by the number of tests
The Bonferroni method is applicable regardless of the correlation between tests
The adjustment made by Bonferroni can lead to a high rate of false negatives when many tests are conducted
Bonferroni adjustment is frequently used in clinical trials with multiple endpoints
It is often considered a "safe" correction method because it ensures strong control of the Type I error rate
In some fields, the Bonferroni correction is used as a benchmark against other methods for multiple testing correction
statistics: Bonferroni correction is particularly useful in genetic association studies with high numbers of SNPs tested
Bonferroni correction is often implemented in statistical software packages like R, SPSS, and SAS
The Bonferroni method minimizes the probability of making at least one Type I error among multiple tests
In some cases, researchers prefer less conservative methods such as false discovery rate (FDR) procedures over Bonferroni for large datasets
The method is black and white in nature, controlling for Type I errors but increasing the chance of Type II errors
Researchers often use Bonferroni correction in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), where thousands of tests are performed
When applied to multiple comparisons, Bonferroni adjusts the p-value threshold to maintain a family-wise error rate of 0.05
Adjusted p-values using Bonferroni are simply the original p-values multiplied by the number of tests, capped at 1
Bonferroni correction is often used in meta-analyses to combine multiple study results while controlling for Type I error
The Bonferroni method has been extended into adaptive procedures like the Holm-Bonferroni method to improve sensitivity
The correction is particularly relevant in studies with a large number of simultaneous hypotheses, such as omics data
Bonferroni’s principle is based on the union bound in probability theory, ensuring a conservative control of Type I error
The correction works by multiplying the p-value by the number of comparisons to maintain a consistent overall error rate
The simplicity of Bonferroni correction makes it a default choice in many statistical software packages
The method is useful in confirmatory analyses where false positives need to be strictly controlled
The correction has been criticized for being overly conservative, leading to missed discoveries in high-throughput experiments
In bioinformatics, Bonferroni correction is often applied to control false positive rates in high-throughput sequencing data
The family-wise error rate controlled by Bonferroni is the probability of making at least one Type I error among all tests
The correction developed significantly influence statistical practices in multiple hypothesis testing, shaping subsequent methods and improvements
The correction is often used in conjunction with other statistical adjustments in complex data analyses
In experimental psychology, it is common to apply Bonferroni corrections when multiple post-hoc tests are conducted following ANOVA
When dealing with multiple comparisons, Bonferroni correction provides a simple rule to maintain overall significance level, especially useful for small to moderate numbers of tests

Methodology and Principles Interpretation

The Bonferroni correction acts as the cautious guardian of statistical integrity, diligently controlling false positives across multiple hypotheses—even if it occasionally whispers "missed discovery" in a high-stakes genome scan.