GITNUX MARKETDATA REPORT 2024

Homegrown Terrorism Statistics: Market Report & Data

Highlights: The Most Important Homegrown Terrorism Statistics

  • In 2019, all but one domestic terror attacks in the US were carried out by right-wing extremists.
  • Between 1994 and 2020, there were 893 domestically planned terrorist attacks in the United States.
  • From 2009 through 2019, right-wing extremists accounted for 76% of terrorist attacks and plots in the US.
  • From 1995 to 2019, 335 people were killed in domestic acts of terrorism.
  • The FBI reports approximately 5,000 ongoing investigations of homegrown terrorism across all 50 states.
  • In 2020, white supremacists were responsible for 67% of the domestic terror threats.
  • Since 9/11, homegrown extremists have carried out more than 85 deadly attacks.
  • Nearly all (96%) of the jihadist terrorists in the US from 2001 to 2020 were born or naturalized citizens.
  • There were 61 homegrown jihadist cases in the US in 2015, the highest number since 2001.
  • Between 2001-2015, 80% of extremist-related fatalities were caused by right-wing extremists.
  • In 2017, domestic extremists were responsible for 59% of terrorist attacks in the US.
  • From 1995 to 2017, right-wing extremists were linked to around 35% of terrorist incidents in the US.
  • 71% of domestic extremist-related killings from 2008 to 2017 were linked to right-wing extremists.
  • The US saw more people killed by domestic extremists than in any year since the Oklahoma City bombing in 2018.
  • In 2021, domestic terrorism arrests in the United States increased by over 50%.
  • There were over 110 homegrown jihadist indictments in the US between 2013 and 2017.
  • From 2011 to 2015, terrorist plots against military targets comprised 27% of homegrown jihadist plots.
  • Domestic terrorist attacks and plots made up 65% of all terrorist events in the US between 1995 and 2012.
  • 2020 was the deadliest year in the US for extremist violence since 1995.
  • In 2017, 34% of the perpetrators of homegrown violent extremist incidents were converts to Islam.

Table of Contents

Understanding the frequency, severity, and patterns of homegrown terrorism is key to helping policy makers, law enforcement, and community leaders make informed decisions about prevention and response strategies. This blog post delves into the crucial topic of Homegrown Terrorism Statistics, shedding light on the trends and figures drawn from comprehensive research and recent data. We shall explore the intricacies of homegrown terrorism, its evolution over the years and the impact it has on society, to gauge its true scale and scope for an enhanced perspective.

The Latest Homegrown Terrorism Statistics Unveiled

In 2019, all but one domestic terror attacks in the US were carried out by right-wing extremists.

Unearthing the chilling reality, the statistic reveals the startling propensity of right-wing extremism behind domestic terror attacks in the US. In the 2019 annals, the Lone exception amplifies the enormous scale of this particular issue. Considering the focus of homegrown terrorism, it’s significantly crucial to scrutinize the ideological influences behind these acts. The information deciphers a story of the most prominent threats encroaching upon domestic security, inciting the necessity for strategic discourse in understanding and combatting this arena of extremism. Consequently, this statistic serves as a cardinal compass directing both public awareness and policy creation, thus crucial for an enlightening blog post on Homegrown Terrorism.

Between 1994 and 2020, there were 893 domestically planned terrorist attacks in the United States.

Looking at the chilling figure, ‘Between 1994 and 2020, there were 893 domestically planned terrorist attacks in the United States’, serves as a stark revelation of the escalating issue of homegrown terrorism. In a discourse about Homegrown Terrorism Statistics, the number crystalizes the gravity and extent of the threat residing within our own borders. The aforementioned statistic dramatically underscores that we’re not merely dealing with sporadic, individual incidents — this is a recurring, pervasive problem that demands comprehensive understanding and meaningful action. As we delve deeper into these disturbing numbers, it becomes an essential focal point, prompting us to question the roots of this surge and urging legislative reforms to counter this mounting national security issue.

From 2009 through 2019, right-wing extremists accounted for 76% of terrorist attacks and plots in the US.

In considering the narrative on Homegrown Terrorism Statistics, a notable pattern unfolds – from 2009 to 2019, right-wing extremists were responsible for an astonishing 76% of terrorist attacks and plots on American soil. The implication of this figure is far-reaching, punctuating the dialogue on domestic terrorism with a clear emphasis on a particular ideological group. In other words, the calculus of internal threat assessment has been significantly influenced by this insight, necessitating an urgent reevaluation and reinforcement of counterterrorism strategies to address the apparent ideological imbalance in domestic terror acts. Furthermore, it draws attention to the increasing need for socio-political discourse and policy adjustments to curb radical ideologies fostering such activities and ensure national security.

From 1995 to 2019, 335 people were killed in domestic acts of terrorism.

Within the landscape of a blog post surrounding the grim narrative of homegrown terrorism, shedding light on the alarming statistic that 335 individuals fell prey to domestic acts of terrorism from 1995 to 2019 imparts crucial context. It underscores the seriousness of this phenomenon, reflecting not only the mounting toll of lives lost, but also emphasizing the pervasive threat these violent acts pose on our national security. It eloquently contributes a numeric testament to the urgency of combatting this issue, and provides readers with a stark snapshot of the human cost associated with homegrown terror. It’s a forceful reminder that these are not isolated incidents, but rather a persistent and dangerous threat that needs to be addressed.

The FBI reports approximately 5,000 ongoing investigations of homegrown terrorism across all 50 states.

Highlighting the statistic that the FBI is currently engaged in around 5,000 investigations of homegrown terrorism across all 50 states punctuates the widespread and pervasive issue of domestic terrorism within our borders. In the grand narrative of homegrown terrorism statistics, this figure serves as a stark reminder of the continuous and painstaking efforts by law enforcement to tackle this insidious menace. It lends significant weight and urgency to the discourse, underscoring that the threat of homegrown terrorism is not a hypothetical issue, but rather, one that permeates every state, compelling constant vigilance and preventive initiatives.

In 2020, white supremacists were responsible for 67% of the domestic terror threats.

In the realm of examining Homegrown Terrorism Statistics, the astounding finding that white supremacists accounted for 67% of the domestic terror threats in 2020 holds profound significance. This chilling statistic not only showcases an alarming trend of radicalization within the home front, but it also helps to dismantle societal presumptions that often associate the risk of terrorism predominantly with foreign elements. The numbers guide us in shifting our focus towards understanding the often overlooked, yet increasingly potent internal sources of extremism. Consequently, this statistic can aid in refining counter-terrorism strategies by redirecting resources, policies and public awareness towards this high-risk group.

Since 9/11, homegrown extremists have carried out more than 85 deadly attacks.

Within a discourse focused on homegrown terrorism statistics, an intriguing narrative emerges from the revelation that post 9/11, over 85 deadly attacks have been conducted by domestic radicals. This datum not only signifies a pivotal shift in the terrorism archetype – from being predominantly foreign-oriented to involving domestic actors – but it also underscores the intensification of a pernicious home-bred danger. It compels us to reassess our understanding of security, urging a spotlight to be refocused within national boundaries, and calls for a comprehensive examination of both the noticeable and hidden threads contributing to this increasing self-inflicted terror phenomenon.

Nearly all (96%) of the jihadist terrorists in the US from 2001 to 2020 were born or naturalized citizens.

In the landscape of homegrown terrorism in the US, the statistic that unveils that almost 96% of jihadist terrorists from 2001 to 2020 were either native-born or naturalized citizens paints a stark picture. Portraying a domestic portrait of terror, this highlights the critical need for focusing security protocols on internal activities rather than external entry points. It sheds light on the uncomfortable reality of extremism brewing within home borders and challenges the societal narrative of terrorist threats as predominantly foreign-based, prompting a radical reassessment of our understanding of homeland security’s current threats and strategies.

There were 61 homegrown jihadist cases in the US in 2015, the highest number since 2001.

Examining the disconcerting spike in homegrown jihadist cases in the US in 2015, which reached a staggering 61, offers a profound understanding of the escalating homegrown terrorism situations. Illustrating the most significant jump since 2001, this statistic serves as a spotlight, revealing the urgency and gravity of the issue, hence demonstrating an inescapable call for strict policy reforms, effective counter-terrorism strategies and invigorated public vigilance. Amidst a climate where safety concerns incrementally intertwine with the terrorism narrative, such stark statistical evidence roots the blog post in concrete, credible data, thereby enabling a comprehensive and compelling discourse on homegrown terrorism.

Between 2001-2015, 80% of extremist-related fatalities were caused by right-wing extremists.

In a thoughtful review of homegrown terrorism statistics, it’s illuminating to note that between 2001-2015, right-wing extremists were responsible for 80% of extremist-related fatalities. This substantial statistic underscores not only the scale and risk associated with right-wing extremism but also the imperative necessity for effective counter-terrorism strategies and policies. The stark data point serves as a wake-up call, highlighting the pivotal role of national and local security initiatives in grappling with domestic terrorism threats, thereby shaping the narrative on the urgency to understand and address all facets of extremism that lurk within home turf.

In 2017, domestic extremists were responsible for 59% of terrorist attacks in the US.

The revelation that 59% of terrorist attacks in the US in 2017 were perpetrated by domestic extremists provides a critical perspective into an often understated aspect of national security in a blog post about Homegrown Terrorism Statistics. Instead of the conventional narrative frequently directed towards international threats, this figure emphasizes the substantial role that internal dissidents play in jeopardizing peace and stability. It underscores the urgency for renewed vigilance and effective strategies in confronting and curtailing homegrown terrorism, alluding to a much-needed shift in the focus to internal threats, thus fostering a comprehensive understanding of public safety challenges.

From 1995 to 2017, right-wing extremists were linked to around 35% of terrorist incidents in the US.

In the context of a blog post exploring homegrown terrorism statistics, the data indicating that right-wing extremists were linked to around 35% of terrorist incidents in the U.S. from 1995 to 2017 offers critical insights. This noteworthy figure illustrates the significant role these political extremist groups play domestically, shaping the landscape of terrorism. By furnishing readers with a concrete overview of this troubling proportion, we lay bare an unnerving truth while emphasizing the urgent need for effective measures to reduce radical ideologies and prevent future incidents of extremist violence.

71% of domestic extremist-related killings from 2008 to 2017 were linked to right-wing extremists.

Within the spectrum of the homegrown terrorism landscape, the statistic that ‘71% of domestic extremist-related killings from 2008 to 2017 were linked to right-wing extremists’ shines a spotlight on an often-underestimated threat. It underscores the pressing reality that right-wing extremism is not an isolated or fringe phenomenon, but, in fact, carries a significant proportion of domestic terrorism incidents. This, in turn, offers an insightful pivot for reformatting existing assumptions and reshaping counter-terrorism strategies to better align with the true face of homegrown terror threats.

The US saw more people killed by domestic extremists than in any year since the Oklahoma City bombing in 2018.

Illuminating the stark reality of homegrown terrorism, the statistic that more people in the US were killed by domestic extremists in 2018 than any year since the Oklahoma City bombing, speaks loudly about the ascending trend of this menace. In a blog post dissecting Homegrown Terrorism Statistics, this alarming number thrusts into focus the continued threat lurking within our own borders. It serves as a potent reminder of not just the breadth but also the intensity of this form of terrorism, marking a critical turning point, which necessitates effective policy measures and community interventions for preventing the escalation of such incidents in the future.

In 2021, domestic terrorism arrests in the United States increased by over 50%.

Highlighting a surge of more than 50% in domestic terrorism arrests in the United States for 2021, underlines the escalating threat within our own borders. In a blog post dissecting homegrown terrorism statistics, this statistic serves as an urgent neon sign, illuminating the growing prevalence and urgency of this issue. This significant increase punctuates the narrative with an undeniable reality of the situation, forcing readers to confront the magnitude and depth of the domestic terrorism problem. It offers the audience a glimpse into shifting patterns and can provoke deeper discussions about potential root causes, effective countermeasures, and the impact on societal stability.

There were over 110 homegrown jihadist indictments in the US between 2013 and 2017.

Dwelling into the raw numbers, one discerns a disquieting picture of domestic terrorism. The chilling tally of over 110 homegrown jihadist indictments in the U.S. between 2013 and 2017 amplifies the reality of how extremism is not confined to distant shores but brewed within our own borders. Underlining the import of vigilance and needed reforms in existing security frameworks, it becomes a beacon of attention, a clarion call that reinforces the robust discussions in our blog post on Homegrown Terrorism Statistics. The message behind the number underscores the urgency to understand and combat this insidious threat lurking in the shadows of our own neighborhoods.

From 2011 to 2015, terrorist plots against military targets comprised 27% of homegrown jihadist plots.

Highlighting an alarming aspect, the statistical finding showcases an intriguing trend, with nearly a third of homegrown jihadist plots in US from 2011 to 2015 being aimed at military targets. This is an unsettling reminder that terrorism is not only a wildcard danger but is increasingly becoming a home-bound threat with a surprisingly focused agenda. In the broader narrative of homegrown terrorism, these figures raise a profound concern towards the vulnerability of military sites, underlining a possible need for strengthening defence mechanisms and strategic responses. It is vital to incorporate this statistic into the discourse on homegrown terrorism, sketching a complete picture of the emerging patterns and specific targets of such activities.

Domestic terrorist attacks and plots made up 65% of all terrorist events in the US between 1995 and 2012.

Shining a spotlight onto the sobering reality of homegrown terror, the statistic revealing a staggering 65% of all terrorist events in the U.S. from 1995 to 2012 being attributed to domestic attacks and plots, serves as a significant wake-up call in comprehending the magnitude of this issue. This particular piece of information not only challenges common assumptions about the origins of terror threats, but acts as a crucial starting point for analyzing the dynamics of domestic terror, its defining factors, trends over time, and potential mitigation strategies. Therefore, it is instrumental in providing insight and perspective in a broader discussion about homegrown terrorism statistics, injecting a sense of immediacy and relevance to the topic.

2020 was the deadliest year in the US for extremist violence since 1995.

Highlighting the chilling statistic, ‘2020 as the deadliest year for extremist violence in the U.S. since 1995,’ underscores a drastic resurgence in domestic terrorism. In the panorama of homegrown terrorism statistics, this crucial fact not only echoes the escalating patterns of violence orchestrated by extremists, but also serves as a stark reminder of the intensified, evolving threat landscape. This spike in devastating extremism consequently thrusts focus onto the necessity for bolstered counter-terrorism strategies and a renewed commitment to combating homegrown extremist ideologies, thereby underscoring a sense of urgency for strategic interventions and policy reviews.

In 2017, 34% of the perpetrators of homegrown violent extremist incidents were converts to Islam.

Shining light on the figure that a noteworthy 34% of homegrown violent extremist incidents in 2017 were perpetrated by those newly adopting Islamic faith underpins the gravity of radicalization processes within communities. Progressing understanding of this phenomenon is integral to the discourse about Homegrown Terrorism Statistics, as it emphasizes where preventive focus may strategically lie. This percentage not only provides a glimpse into the paths leading to extremist activities, but it also contributes a significant layer to the complex narrative of homegrown terrorism, reflexively guiding policy decisions and informing the way societal structures address this issue.

Conclusion

The analysis and tracking of homegrown terrorism statistics reveal significant intelligence about the genesis, pattern, and potential prevention strategies associated with this ongoing security issue. However, the findings should also incite diligent and proactive steps to counteract these threats while fostering an atmosphere of belongingness and peace. Making productive use of such data can vastly enhance public safety efforts, national security measures, and community resilience, ultimately reducing the likelihood of homegrown terrorism incidents.

References

0. – https://www.www.justsecurity.org

1. – https://www.www.jstor.org

2. – https://www.repository.law.umich.edu

3. – https://www.www.csis.org

4. – https://www.www.adl.org

5. – https://www.www.dhs.gov

6. – https://www.www.brennancenter.org

7. – https://www.www.heritage.org

8. – https://www.www.rand.org

9. – https://www.www.npr.org

10. – https://www.tennesseestar.com

11. – https://www.www.newamerica.org

12. – https://www.www.statista.com

13. – https://www.www.start.umd.edu

FAQs

What is homegrown terrorism?

Homegrown terrorism refers to violent acts committed by individuals or groups that are nationals of the country they're attacking and who are motivated by political, religious or ideological beliefs. These acts can include bombings, shootings, or other forms of violence meant to instill fear or to achieve a strategic or political goal.

How prevalent is homegrown terrorism in the United States?

The prevalence varies year by year. However, extremist-related murders in the U.S. have predominantly been carried out by right-wing extremists, according to a recent report by the Anti-Defamation League. Globally, it is a small percentage of all terrorism incidents but can have a significant impact due to the unexpected nature and high profile targets.

Are certain groups more likely to engage in homegrown terrorism?

Unfortunately, there's no definitive profile of a homegrown terrorist. They could come from any ethnic, religious, or socio-economic background. However, they often share the characteristic of feeling marginalized, alienated, or persecuted, which may motivate their violent actions.

What can be done to prevent homegrown terrorism?

Prevention involves several strategies, from counter-narratives and de-radicalization programs to intelligence work and targeted law enforcement activities. Cooperation between local communities, law enforcement, and organizations provides for an effective early warning system. It involves a holistic approach towards understanding and tackling the factors that drive radicalization in the first place.

Has homegrown terrorism increased over the years?

Trends in homegrown terrorism can be difficult to measure due to inconsistencies in definitions and data collection. However, many experts suggest that there's been an increase in recent years, particularly with the advent of the internet and social media, which can be used to propagate extremist ideologies and recruit sympathizers far more efficiently than traditional communication methods.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents