GITNUX MARKETDATA REPORT 2024

Election Demographic Statistics: Market Report & Data

Highlights: The Most Important Election Demographic Statistics

  • 50% of voters in the 2020 U.S presidential election were aged between 50 and 64 years.
  • The 2020 U.S presidential election featured the highest voter turnout since 1900, with 66.8% of the voting-eligible population participating.
  • In the 2020 U.S election, voters with a college degree made up 41% of the electorate.
  • In the 2020 general election in the UK, 47% of voters aged 18-24 voted for the Labour Party.
  • During the 2021 Canadian election, 30% of voters aged 18-34 voted for the Liberal Party.
  • In the 2018 Brazilian election, 48.5% of the electorate had a household income of 2 minimum wages or less.
  • In the 2020 U.S presidential election, 59% of women voters backed Joe Biden.
  • In the 2016 American presidential election, almost 1 in 3 Asian-American voters were first-time voters.
  • 61% of African American women voters voted in the 2020 US elections.
  • In 2019, 63.4% of disabled voters reported voting in the UK general election.
  • In the 2020 US general elections, college graduate women voters favored Biden over Trump by 26 percentage points.
  • In the 2014 European Parliament elections, 42.6% of the population aged 55 and over voted.
  • In 2016, approximately 46.1% of voters aged 18-29 voted in the U.S. presidential election.
  • In the 2019 Canadian Federal Election, 67% of eligible voters cast their vote.
  • In the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, 70% of LGBTQ+ adults supported Biden over Trump.
  • In the 2017 New Zealand general election, 69.9% of the adult population aged 18-24 voted.
  • In the 2020 U.S presidential election, 85% of voters who identified as conservative voted for Trump.
  • In the 2016 U.S presidential election, 60% of married women voted for Hillary Clinton.
  • In the 2018 Swedish General Election, the Sweden Democrats were most popular among male voters, with a preference of 24%.
  • In the 2018 Mexican presidential election, 64% of voters from the northeast region voted for López Obrador.

Table of Contents

On this blog post, we’re going to delve deep into the world of Election Demographic Statistics. The electoral dynamics of any region are a fascinating reflection of its social structure. Exploring these statistics is not just about understanding who voted and how, but also about deciphering patterns and trends linked to age, gender, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity. These insights not only provide a comprehensive overview of past electoral behaviors but can also shed a crucial light on predicting future voting trends. Let’s dissect the intrinsic bond between demographics and election results, one data point at a time.

The Latest Election Demographic Statistics Unveiled

50% of voters in the 2020 U.S presidential election were aged between 50 and 64 years.

Delving into the 2020 U.S presidential election data reveals the powerful influence of an often-underestimated group: the 50 to 64 age bracket. Statistically, this group accounted for a decisive 50% of total voters, spotlighting the potent pull these demographics hold on the electoral landscape. This considerable voting bloc’s preferences, priorities, and viewpoints should be a focus for campaigners, strategists, and analysts alike. It also serves as a reminder to bloggers and readers about the importance of recognizing and understanding the far-reaching implications of demographic trends in elections.

The 2020 U.S presidential election featured the highest voter turnout since 1900, with 66.8% of the voting-eligible population participating.

Illuminating the nuance of Election Demographic Statistics, the revelation that the 2020 U.S presidential election experienced the zenith of voter participation since 1900 with a formidable 66.8% of the eligible electorate casting votes isn’t merely a fact, but a milestone. It underscores the extensive surge in civic commitment across the U.S., substantiating theories about political dynamics and sociopolitical engagement. More than a record-breaking turnout, such a pivotal shift can offer profound insights into the evolving political landscape, potentially setting a new precedent for future electoral conduct and significantly reforming the demographic patterns at play during these crucial democratic exercises.

In the 2020 U.S election, voters with a college degree made up 41% of the electorate.

Unraveling the puzzle of Election Demographic Statistics, the revelation that in the 2020 U.S. election, 41% of the voters boasted a college degree is a striking testament to the influence of educational attainment on political participation. Embedding deeper insights, this statistic underscores the increasingly prominent role that educated professionals play within the electing body. Moreover, it helps define electoral behavior, policy preferences, and party selection, given that scholastic experience often echoes in ideological orientation. Hence, such an intellectual composition of the electorate propels comprehensive understanding, tailoring strategies in political campaigning and policy-making.

In the 2020 general election in the UK, 47% of voters aged 18-24 voted for the Labour Party.

The statistic that reveals 47% of voters aged 18-24 supported the Labour Party during the 2020 general election in the UK paints a compelling snapshot of the political leanings of the younger demographic. As a reflection of the sociopolitical pulse within the age group, it lends itself to deeper analysis and interpretation within a blog post on Election Demographic Statistics. This factor can potentially illuminate policy alignments, campaign effectiveness, generational concerns, and trend forecasts. Ultimately, it underscores the fact that the younger generation’s voice significantly contributes to the political landscape, thereby leading to strategic discussions for future campaigns and policy adjustments.

During the 2021 Canadian election, 30% of voters aged 18-34 voted for the Liberal Party.

Unraveling the enthralling tapestry of Election Demographic Statistics, the statistic that 30% of voters aged 18-34 voted for the Liberal Party in the 2021 Canadian election offers a riveting dimension to the narrative. This discernible pattern provides a formative insight into the Liberal Party’s appeal to the younger voting demographic, hinting towards their alignment with the party’s policies, ideologies, and leadership. Noteworthy in its implications, this figure can be instrumental in strategic adjustments, planning election campaigns, policy formulation, and in understanding the electoral climate’s general tilt, from a demographic perspective. This piece of information and its careful analysis thereby wield the power to change future political landscapes.

In the 2018 Brazilian election, 48.5% of the electorate had a household income of 2 minimum wages or less.

Delving into the 2018 Brazilian election demographics, it’s enlightening to highlight that nearly half of the electorate, precisely 48.5%, belonged to the lower income bracket, their household income equating to 2 minimum wages or less. This statistic paints a vivid socioeconomic portrait of the participating electorate, hinting at an influential voting bloc whose political preferences and decisions may arguably be shaped by economic policies, social welfare issues, and similar concerns affecting that particular wage category. As such, in the grand tapestry of election demographic statistics, this data slice serves as a critical thread, drawing attention to the indispensability of understanding the income-based dividing lines in the electorate for election strategists, political candidates, social scientists, and keen observers of the political landscape.

In the 2020 U.S presidential election, 59% of women voters backed Joe Biden.

The spotlight vividly illuminates on the statistic revealing that 59% of women voters supported Joe Biden in the 2020 U.S presidential election. This vital figure serves as a testament to the growing influence and decisive role of female voters in shaping the political landscape of America. Moreover, it uncovers the potentials of gender-based voting patterns and preferences that could have critical implications for future electoral strategies. In the grand narrative of election demographic statistics, this offers an intriguing insight into the evolving dynamics of gender politics and its consequential impact on the election outcomes.

In the 2016 American presidential election, almost 1 in 3 Asian-American voters were first-time voters.

The statistic reflecting that nearly one-third of Asian-American voters in the 2016 U.S elections were casting their ballots for the first time paints a vivid picture of the shifting demographics and the evolving political landscape within the United States. It evidences a rise in political engagement and potential sway in voting outcomes within the Asian-American community that cannot be overlooked. In a discussion centered on election demographic statistics, this offers crucial insights into previously untapped voter pools, their contributions to electoral dynamics, and how future campaigns might need to adjust their strategies to address this changing electorate. Essentially, it breathes life into the voices previously unheard and embodies the ever-changing face of America’s democratic process.

61% of African American women voters voted in the 2020 US elections.

Highlighting ‘61% of African American women voters participation in the 2020 US elections’ underscores a significant shift in the electoral landscape. The vitality of this statistic is rooted in its ability to shed light on the political mobilization of a historically marginalized group. This turnout distinguishes African American women as an influential and active demographic in the American political field, solidifying their role as a crucial segment of the electorate. Their participation rate can potentially sway electoral outcomes and political agendas, and provides in-depth insights into changing voting patterns, hence making this a focal point in a post about election demographic statistics.

In 2019, 63.4% of disabled voters reported voting in the UK general election.

Illuminating the power of a rapidly widening electorate, the figure ‘In 2019, 63.4% of disabled voters reportedly cast their ballots in the UK general election’ underscores the robust participation from previously marginalized groups. The statistic doesn’t just represent a figure, but it shouts aloud the growing political engagement and the shifting gears of democratic inclusion in the UK election narrative. Through such quantitative insights, political analysts, researchers, and policy makers can probe deeper into the voting patterns, issues of accessibility, and the influence of disability in electoral politics. So, when evaluating election demographic statistics, the disabled voters’ turnout ratio is not just an interesting fact, it’s a litmus test mirroring the democratic health of a society.

In the 2020 US general elections, college graduate women voters favored Biden over Trump by 26 percentage points.

Highlighting the statistic “In the 2020 US general elections, college graduate women voters favored Biden over Trump by 26 percentage points” delivers a surprising insight into the deep-seated role education played in the contemporary political landscape. This significant disparity not only underlines the bifurcation of political preferences along educational lines but also indicates the gender-sensitive leanings of the educated class. While sketching a comprehensive picture of election demographics, it helps illuminate how voter demographics, their educational attainment, and gender can potentially influence electoral outcomes. Furthermore, it infers that the political sentiment and influence of college-educated women could be pivotal in future elections, emphasizing the need for political strategists to factor this trend in their campaigns.

In the 2014 European Parliament elections, 42.6% of the population aged 55 and over voted.

Unraveling the demographic nuances from the 2014 European Parliament elections, we discern that a vibrant, whopping 42.6% of voters were aged 55 and above. This conveys a critical role the older demographic plays in shaping the electoral landscape, their participation instrumental in bestowing political direction. As we delve into Election Demographic Statistics, this fact helps us understand the influence this age group yield, and can convey policy makers’ priority of addressing issues important to this demographic. In essence, it’s a testament to the political power and influence of the mature segment of European society.

In 2016, approximately 46.1% of voters aged 18-29 voted in the U.S. presidential election.

The vivid tapestry of Election Demographic Statistics is threaded with compelling stories, one such being the 46.1% voter turnout among 18-29 year-olds in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. This figure is more than just data; it signals the political engagement level of America’s youth, a crucial demographic representing the future of the country. Their votes influence policies and shape the political landscape for years to come, making this statistic a key factor in our understanding of voter behavior, policy preference, and the level of efforts political campaigns need to dedicate to appeal to this demographic.

In the 2019 Canadian Federal Election, 67% of eligible voters cast their vote.

A keen understanding of electoral dynamics dwells in analyzing statistics such as the 67% voter turnout in the 2019 Canadian Federal Election. It reveals a significant facet of electoral engagement, disclosing not only the level of political involvement but also potentially indicating the public’s trust in the democratic system. As demographics continuously mold and influence voting patterns and political preferences, a substantial turnout signifies the dynamism and the socio-political rhythms of the population. This number, in a blog post about Election Demographic Statistics, serves as a valuable anchor point, offering insights into the mobilization of different age-groups, the impact of various policy issues, and the efficacy of voter activation strategies.

In the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, 70% of LGBTQ+ adults supported Biden over Trump.

Looking at the rainbow, a 70% figure emerges, casting a perspective on the 2020 U.S. Presidential election’s demographic landscape. The said figure represents the LGBTQ+ adults who supported Biden over Trump, lending a vibrant hue to the electoral palette. This striking statistic underscores the electoral influence of the LBGTQ+ community, a dynamic and significant demographic block, that can tip the scales in close races. Analyzing their voting patterns can provide key insights for election strategists, policy designers, and social analysts while crafting inclusive campaigns and policies. This number also highlights the political preferences of this group and could signal their stance on human rights, equality, and social issues — crucial narratives in the discourse of election demographic statistics.

In the 2017 New Zealand general election, 69.9% of the adult population aged 18-24 voted.

The noteworthy figure that 69.9% of 18-24 year-olds voted in the 2017 New Zealand general election offers invaluable insight into the active political engagement of this age group. It’s akin to the electoral pulse of New Zealand’s youth, illuminating their growing clout and their increasingly important role in shaping the country’s political landscape. Unraveling and understanding such figures in a blog post about Election Demographic Statistics not only piques reader interest but also establishes a nuanced understanding of political behavior and its demographic variations, propelling further discourse and research into the subject.

In the 2020 U.S presidential election, 85% of voters who identified as conservative voted for Trump.

The palpable footprint of political ideologies on election outcomes is profoundly underscored by the statistic that, in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, 85% of voters identifying as conservative cast their ballots for Trump. This statistical insight serves as an indispensable lighthouse, illuminating the strong correlation between voters’ self-proclaimed ideological leanings and their election choices, making it a key ingredient for any election demographic analysis. It unravels an intriguing layer of the U.S. electoral landscape, thus adding depth to the discourse on election trends while setting the stage for comprehensive and nuanced discussions about the influence of political ideology on voting patterns.

In the 2016 U.S presidential election, 60% of married women voted for Hillary Clinton.

Understanding voting demographics is essential for the careful dissection of electoral behavior. Highlighting that ‘60% of married women voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election’, offers an intriguing insight into how marital status and gender might influence political leanings. This specific demographic voting pattern conveys the political preferences of this particular group and suggests that national politics might be influenced by social factors such as gender and marital status. Such information is crucial not only for political strategists but also for those with an avid interest in demographic behavior and its effects on the electoral landscape.

In the 2018 Swedish General Election, the Sweden Democrats were most popular among male voters, with a preference of 24%.

In a blog post dissecting demographic statistics from the 2018 Swedish General Election, the metric revealing the Sweden Democrats as the party of choice for 24% of male voters offers a fascinating perspective. It signifies the intriguing leanings of male voters towards the Sweden Democrats, providing a robust indication of their political preferences. Drawing from this data, we can gauge the overall electoral landscape, dissect existing voting patterns, understand the gender-based voting tendencies, evaluate the effectiveness of the party’s campaign strategies, and even predict future behavioral trends. Analyzing such detailed insights can shape and revolutionize the political strategies that parties employ in targeting their audience more accurately during election campaigns.

In the 2018 Mexican presidential election, 64% of voters from the northeast region voted for López Obrador.

Thrown into sharp relief by the 2018 Mexican presidential election, the powerful sway of the northeast region becomes evident, painting López Obrador as a favored choice with a hefty 64% backing from those voters. This vivid demographic statistic kindles intriguing conversations about regional electoral behaviors and trends, providing a multi-layered understanding of wider voting patterns. Furthermore, it serves as a touchpoint for political strategists and commentators to assess the influence of regional politics on national outcomes. This illuminating fact, thus, spins a broader narrative of electoral dynamics in Mexico and can act as a base mark for future demographic and political forecasts.

Conclusion

Thorough analysis of Election Demographic Statistics provides valuable insights into the voting behaviors and preferences of various demographic groups. Understanding these patterns can contribute significantly to the development of effective political strategies. While age, race, education, gender, and socioeconomic status continue to play a pivotal role in shaping electoral outcomes, consistent shifts in these demographics necessitate an ongoing analysis. Ultimately, demographic statistics not only present a snapshot of our current electorate but also project possible future trends that could redefine political landscapes.

References

0. – https://www.poll.forumresearch.com

1. – https://www.www.europarl.europa.eu

2. – https://www.www.gov.uk

3. – https://www.www.cnn.com

4. – https://www.www.elections.nz

5. – https://www.www.statista.com

6. – https://www.www.blackenterprise.com

7. – https://www.www.apiavote.org

8. – https://www.www.pewresearch.org

9. – https://www.www.elections.ca

10. – https://www.www.journalofdemocracy.org

11. – https://www.www.nbcnews.com

12. – https://www.www.census.gov

13. – https://www.www.scb.se

14. – https://www.www.tse.jus.br

FAQs

What is 'Election Demographic'?

The term 'Election Demographic' refers to the study of the population cohorts who vote in an election. These cohorts can be divided by characteristics such as age, income, gender, race, education, and other socio-economic factors.

How does demographic data influence electoral politics?

Demographic data plays a significant role in electoral politics. It enables political parties to understand the concerns, interests, and voting patterns of various groups within the population. This could assist in formulating campaign strategies and policy proposals, aiming to win the support of key demographic groups.

What are some of the key demographic groups in electoral politics?

Some of the key demographic groups in electoral politics are young voters, senior citizens, women, men, African-Americans, Hispanic people, Asian-Americans, religious groups, urban dwellers, rural communities, highly educated individuals, working-class voters, and so on.

Does a demographic shift affect electoral results?

Yes, demographic shift can significantly impact election results. As the population changes, so do their interests and concerns. When a demographic group grows in size or becomes more politically active, it can shift the balance of power in an election. If a political party fails to adapt to these shifts, it may lose its support among the changing population.

What role does the age demographic play in elections?

Age demographics play a vital role in elections because age groups often have distinct political interests and voting behaviors. For instance, younger voters may prioritize issues like education funding, climate change, and job opportunities, while older voters often focus on social security, healthcare, and pension policies. These variations in interests can shape the political landscape and influence election outcomes.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents