The Most Surprising Early Voting Statistics in 2024

Table of Contents

In the vibrant world of politics, voting is the cornerstone of democracy, with early voting becoming increasingly significant. Engaging with early voting statistics offers us a fascinating glimpse into shifts in voting behavior, and a predictive tool to help anticipate the outcomes of political races nationwide. This blog post will delve into the intricacies of early voting statistics, looking at the trends, the driving forces behind these numbers and their implications in our current political landscape. Whether you’re a political enthusiast, a campaign strategist, or just an inquisitive citizen, our exploration of early voting data will shed a whole new light on the electoral process.

The Latest Early Voting Statistics Unveiled

In the 2020 general elections, 101 million people voted early in the United States.

The pulsating heart of the 2020 general elections was the incredible upsurge in early voting, with an astonishing 101 million Americans casting their ballots ahead of Election Day. Scaling this height for the first time in history has immense implications both socially and politically, weaving a completely reimagined narrative into our blog post narrative about Early Voting Statistics. The unprecedented number doesn’t only underscore the passion and commitment radiating from the electorate, but it also highlights the far-reaching logistical triumph that facilitated such massive early participation. This sprawling landscape of early voting introduces an exciting new dimension to the Election Day analysis, providing a fertile ground for exploring trends, patterns and possibilities within voting behavior.

Early voting (either by mail or in person) represented about 50% of all votes cast in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

In the grand tapestry of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election narrative, early voters held the power of the pivot, casting their decisive votes even before the actual election day. The figure, a staggering 50%, paints a gripping portrait of an engaged and proactive electorate. In a blog post about Early Voting Statistics, this figure is the impressive peak, the narrative high-point, overwhelming evidence of a seismic shift in voter behavior. It suggests a recasting of traditional voting methods and underscores the prominence and potential of early voting in shaping future electoral outcomes. The soaring participation in early voting illuminates its convenience and crucial role in broadening voter participation, forming a compelling argument for its expansion and further study.

Black Americans were more likely to experience long wait times while voting early in 2020, compared to White Americans.

Highlighting the disparity in wait times among different racial groups presents a stark illustration of not just the voting process, but of the larger systemic inequalities that pervade our society. It alerts us to the fact that the democratic access isn’t uniformly smooth for every stratum of our society. This metric in particular, intensifies our discussion on early voting statistics, nudging us to explore the potential obstacles that are causing these inequalities, be it the number of polling stations, the geographic distribution of these resources, or even the socioeconomic dynamics. It drives home the argument that for a completely democratic setup, these gaps need to be addressed and bridged. A mere increase in the number of early voters can’t be celebrated in isolation, without taking into consideration the quality of their voting experience.

Nearly 60% of all early votes in 2020 were cast by women.

Highlighting the statistic that ‘Nearly 60% of all early votes in 2020 were cast by women,’ serves as a pivotal focal point in a blog post about Early Voting Statistics. It underscores the persistent and magnified political engagement of women, shedding light on a demographic group that is making significant strides in shaping the panorama of elections. This crucial data point not only underlines the growing trend of female participation in the democratic process early on but also sets the stage to explore any unique issues, motivations or challenges that this demographic might face or contribute to early voting. Moreover, dissecting this statistic further can offer valuable insights for political strategies, reforms, or initiatives that resonate with this critical group of voters. Consequently, the reverberations of this narrative, weaving women’s participation in early voting, can provoke thoughtful dialogue and considerations within the realm of elections, politics, and voting patterns.

Texas led the nation in early voting in the 2020 election, with over 9 million early votes cast.

Presenting this piece of information is significant in painting a vivid picture of the magnitude of early voting in the 2020 elections. Texas became a beacon of unprecedented voter participation, casting a dazzling light with over 9 million early votes. This not only punctuates the overall theme of early voting statistics, but it also salutes Texas for leading the nation, thereby encouraging other states to reevaluate their voting approaches and galvanize their people to be part of the change. Reflecting such a noteworthy fact enhances the depth and the value of a blog post about Early Voting Statistics.

66% of early voters were 65 years or older in the U.S. for the 2020 election.

Diving into the compelling world of early voting habits, one draws attention to the fact that 66% of early voters were 65 years or older in the U.S. for the 2020 election. This nugget of knowledge serves a crucial role in substantiating the impact of this demographic on early voting. It illuminates the proactivity and political engagement of our senior citizens, establishing them as a significant force driving the early voting phenomenon.

This pivot point is particularly meaningful as the voting behavior of this age group can profoundly influence electoral outcomes. They often have decided views and tend to show higher voter turnout. Therefore, their early voting preferences can be a guiding light to political campaigns in developing strategies to appeal to this demographic.

Furthermore, analyzing this statistic can lead to valuable insights regarding voter accessibility, the effectiveness of voting information dissemination to older citizens, and potential areas for improvement. Hence, it’s like a compass guiding us towards an enhanced understanding of early voting patterns, demographics and engagement.

47% of registered voters say they prefer to vote before Election Day.

Imagine standing on one leg of a scale, which represents Election Day. The other leg is teetering precariously with anticipation — it represents the votes yet to come. Now, picture 47% of the registered voters placing their weight on that precarious leg, declaring their preference to vote before Election Day. This is far from an insignificant number — in fact, it’s nearly half. This percentage is like the quiet hum of a tuning fork, setting the tone for a larger discussion about early voting statistics.

This 47% gives pollsters, political enthusiasts, and policy makers an intriguing glimpse into the shifting landscape of American election habits. It points to changing voter behaviors, possible comfort with the options of early and mail-in voting, and the potential impact these changes could have on forecasting and election results.

In the context of a blog post about early voting, this statistic springs from the page like a siren call, urging readers to consider how influential this group could be. Particularly because their choices could set a precedent, potentially influencing future legislation and strategies associated with early voting. It provides a launching pad for discussing the motivations and implications of this modern-day voting trend, making it an essential component to any conversation around early voting statistics.

Between 2008 and 2016, early voting doubled from 21% to 42% of the electorate.

Delving into the realm of early voting statistics, an insightful observation arises: from 2008 to 2016, the proportion of the electorate opting for early voting catapulted from 21% to 42%. The striking leap echoes the shifting trend of the electorate and represents a positive swing in the convenience and popular acceptance of early voting. The increase not only underscores the growing trust in this form of electoral participation but also paints an intriguing prediction for the future. As the figures continue to ascend, so does the imapct on election strategies, policy decision making, and ultimately, the democratic process.

Early voting has steadily increased since 1992, when only 7% of voters cast their ballots early.

Highlighting the proliferation of early voting since 1992, where a nominal 7% of voters chose to cast their ballots early, enhances the narrative of the changing landscape of voter behavior. This serves as a pivotal point of focus in a blog post about Early Voting Statistics. The growing trend underpins the rising importance and acceptance of early voting. It uncovers a shift in citizens’ interaction with the democratic process, indicating their value for convenience, flexibility, and perhaps an increasing mistrust or disillusionment with traditional Election Day voting. Furthermore, understanding these patterns may help forecast future voter behavior, influencing strategic decisions for political campaigns or lawmakers.

The share of voters who cast their ballot at a voting machine on Election Day fell from 62% in 2008 to 23% in 2020.

This intriguing shift from 62% in 2008 to 23% in 2020 of voters using voting machines on Election Day offers a dramatic visual of the rapid evolution of voting habits within the United States. It paints a picture of the increasing popularity and acceptance of early voting, hinting at the potential transformation of future elections. Seamlessly woven within the tapestry of early voting statistics, it illuminates how political engagement is being reshaped, revealing the rise of non-traditional methods like mail-in ballots and early in-person voting. In essence, this statistic is a vibrant thread in the dynamic narrative of evolving American electoral participation.

According to the 2020 Survey of the Performance of American Elections, 74% of voters were confident in the confidentiality of early voting.

Interpreting this remarkable statistic, a reassuring perception of security resonates with around 74% of voters who trust in the early voting process’s discreet nature, as per the 2020 Survey of the Performance of American Elections. In the context of a blog post dealing with Early Voting Statistics, this offers an enlightening insight. It demonstrates a substantial inclination and trustworthiness towards the early voting procedure among voters, promising a progressive shift in electoral behavior and outcomes. This figure could potentially allay any latent fears surrounding the concept of early voting and encourage broader participation, thus serving as a critical data point in future electoral strategy planning and voter education programs.

By 2020, 45 states were offering some form of early voting.

This eye-opening statistic holds a mirror up to the expanding trend of early voting in the United States. With an impressive count of 45 states accommodating early voting by 2020, it reinforces the growing appreciation for this voting method, and its increasing role in shaping electoral outcomes. This sweeping adoption is a clear testament to the evolving landscape of voter convenience and accessibility in American democracy, a riveting point of discussion in any discourse on early voting statistics.

In the 2018 mid-term elections, approximately 40 million Americans voted early, nearly double the number from 2014.

Highlighting a nearly doubled turnout in early voting between 2014 and 2018 mid-term elections, underscores the rapidly shifting voter behaviors and receptivity towards options that offer convenience and flexibility. This massive surge in figures not only attests to the heightened political engagement, but also projects a trend that may shape the future of electoral participation in the United States. It punctuates the importance of early voting dynamics within election strategy, voter outreach, and policy-making, crucial factors to take into account when analyzing Early Voting Statistics.

In 33 states and the District of Columbia, any qualified voter may cast a ballot during an early-voting period without offering an excuse.

One cannot overlook the undeniable impact of this statistic in the panorama of early voting statistics. It casts light upon the robust and inclusive democracy that’s at play in 33 states and the District of Columbia, where an individual’s right to vote doesn’t just fall on a single day, but spreads over an early voting period. Voting is now more accessible than ever, removing the barricades of ‘excuses’ and empowering every qualified voter to make their voice heard. This not only emphasizes the growing emphasis in these regions on a voter-friendly environment, but also indicates a trend towards flexible voting practices that could alter the landscape of future elections.

Early voting has led to an increase in total voter turnout in general elections, with an estimated 2-4% rise across states.

In plumbing the depths of early voting statistics, one can’t ignore the ripple effect early voting has in stirring the pool of voter turnout. The indication of a 2-4% surge in overall voting in general elections across various states serves as a buoy marker, a testament of its impactful influence. Such a rise, though modest in percentage, holds a profound implication in the democratic process, empowering more voices to be heard. Hence, this statistic not only shines a spotlight on the individual’s civic duty but also magnifies the cumulative power of early voting that shapes the political landscape. The correlation of early voting and increased voter turnout underscores the importance of providing voter convenience and access, reinforcing the validity of early voting and gives it the gravitas it deserves in the discourse of electoral statistics.


In a nutshell, early voting statistics don’t just offer intriguing insights into voter behavior and preferences, they also reflect broader trends within our society and the health of our democracy. The numbers tell a compelling story about levels of engagement, confidence in the electoral process, and election outcomes. As these trends evolve and grow, early voting will continue to play an integral role in shaping the political landscape and influencing the way we approach elections. Ultimately, early voting is not just a mere statistic. It is a valuable political tool that can empower the electorate, foster higher participation rates and create more inclusive democracies.


0. –

1. –

2. –

3. –

4. –

5. –

6. –

7. –

8. –

9. –

10. –

11. –

12. –


What is early voting?

Early voting is a process by which voters in a public election can vote prior to the scheduled election day. Early voting can take place remotely, such as via mail, or in person at voting centers.

How prevalent is early voting in the United States?

Early voting is quite prevalent in the United States. As per statistics, about 40% of all votes in the 2016 election were cast early. The trend seems to be growing as many states are expanding early and absentee voting laws.

Do all states allow early voting?

Early voting laws vary from state to state. As of now, about two-thirds of the states—37, to be exact—offer some sort of Early Voting. Some states also offer "no excuse" early voting, which means that any voter can vote early without providing a reason.

Does early voting affect election outcomes?

It's hard to say definitively as it often depends on the specific election and various factors. However, research suggests that early voting generally doesn't favor one party over another, but it can sometimes increase voter turnout.

Are early votes counted the same as those cast on Election Day?

Yes, early votes are counted in the exact same way as votes cast on Election Day. They are considered every bit as official and are subject to the same verification processes and protections against fraud.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents